OT (maybe): what is meant by a QB "seeing ghosts"?

Submitted by JDeanAuthor on October 22nd, 2019 at 7:55 PM

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/27902846/jets-fuming-sam-darnold-seeing-ghosts-comment-made-air

Bascially the article is about the Jets organization not being happy that Darnold was telling them he was "seeing ghosts" as yesterday's game progressed.

I didn't see the game, so I guess I'm not quite sure what he means by that.   Eliminating for the moment the obvious literal understanding, is he referring to his own players or the Patriots' D in his statement, and in what way is he "seeing ghosts"?

BoFlex

October 22nd, 2019 at 8:01 PM ^

I don’t know 100%, but a former player on ESPN (sorry, I forget who) was explaining that Darnold was referring to the Patriots’ defense.

I don’t know if it is a universal football term used by players or not. Essentially, he was saying that when QBs read the defense, and diagnosis that it is about to be a blitz/cover-0... they mentally prepare to get rid of the ball in 0-1 seconds.

However, if the defense is just bluffing and backs out into coverage at the last second. The QB might still be mentally processing it as a blitz and “sees ghosts” coming at them and gets rid of the ball quickly into coverage.

 

I guess New England’s defense was doing that a lot to Darnold last night successfully.

goblue224

October 22nd, 2019 at 8:29 PM ^

The @patriots Cov 0 blitz package is historic and generational to me. It made @nyjets QB see “GHOSTS” last night & this is why. You would too, and Sam isn’t alone... @mikegiardi @richcimini @briancoz @patsfans @getupespn @damienwoody pic.twitter.com/22ZzeMpIUJ

— Dan Orlovsky (@danorlovsky7) October 22, 2019

Here's the breakdown from this morning. Orlovsky does a fantastic job breaking it down.

befuggled

October 23rd, 2019 at 9:46 AM ^

Eh, I've forgiven him for that. He was a marginal NFL quarterback on the worst Detroit team of our lifetime and there's no way he would have been successful. Jon Kitna and Daunte Culpepper were both experienced NFL starters at the tail end of their career and they didn't do any better on that team.

I'll take Orlovsky as an analyst over a lot of guys who were good QBs in the NFL. I'm looking at you, Troy Aikman!

MGlobules

October 22nd, 2019 at 9:22 PM ^

They've allowed three touchdowns in seven games. They were completely suffocating through the first half against NY. It really was something to behold.

And on the other side of the ball the Pats are a completely ragtag group of misfits who are nonetheless so well drilled and clever that the score was still 24-0 at halftime.

CityOfKlompton

October 22nd, 2019 at 11:50 PM ^

Thought the same thing. While DB has never been so balsy to go cover-0 (at least that I can remember), the very same principle is basically the same that his defense is built upon. We're going to attack and get to you before you can get the ball out. In the event you do get the ball out before we get to you, it will be too early for your receivers while our secondary is ready to pounce. (See: 2018 Wisconsin game.)

When executed properly with the appropriate personnel, you can then begin completely confusing the quarterback and stop an offense before it even gets started. (See: 2019 Iowa game.)

JonnyHintz

October 23rd, 2019 at 8:52 AM ^

I wonder how much of that is trusting Metellus/Hawkins more in coverage than Dax/Gray. They’ve shown to only trust three corners, so having all three on the field at once is less than ideal if someone needs a breather too. 
 

i don’t think the staff is ignorant to the concept that 3 corners would be more ideal, but the personnel would dictate more of that than anything. If Brown trusts his safeties in man, he’s putting his safeties in man. Simple as that. 

UM_Ftown

October 22nd, 2019 at 8:07 PM ^

When I heard it live, I thought it was just a figure of speech as in "I'm seeing things that are not actually there". That could have been open receivers, defenders, etc.

I don't like the Jets or Darnold but I felt bad for the kid, he was clearly rattled against the best D in the NFL, should have pulled him in the 3rd. 

freelion

October 22nd, 2019 at 8:12 PM ^

Similar to Happy Feet which Shea suffers from at times. It's basically not trusting your eyes and the playcall and playing scared

Jack Be Nimble

October 22nd, 2019 at 8:14 PM ^

It's a figure of speech. In this context, it refers to the fact that Darnold was under so much pressure, and the patriots so effectively disguised their coverages, that he began seeing things that weren't there. He would feel a blitzer coming only to find that there wasn't anyone there this time. The guy dropped into coverage right into the lane Darnold was passing into.

cornman

October 22nd, 2019 at 8:23 PM ^

He means he was seeing receivers he thought were open even though they weren't.  It's a relatively common idiom to convey that you can't trust what you're seeing, which is probably why NFL Films chose to air it.  I'm not sure why people find it so amusing.  

Drew Henson's Backup

October 22nd, 2019 at 8:36 PM ^

Well for those who were not participating in the MNF open thread:

https://youtu.be/4YtJHj88xs0

Streetchemist

October 22nd, 2019 at 8:45 PM ^

Kind of a dick move of ESPN to air that IMO. Apparently NFL teams are forced to have their QB be mic’d up for at least one game a year and the people at NFL Films (and the Jets) are pissed this was allowed.  

The Pharaoh of Filth

October 22nd, 2019 at 9:23 PM ^

This is one of those things that is being overblown.

Too much information out there for people who cannot handle too much information.