Maryland Football Report

Submitted by HelloHeisman91 on October 25th, 2018 at 2:17 PM

It looks to me like they are laying the groundwork to keep Durkin. 

 

“The commission found that the Maryland football team did not have a ‘toxic culture,’ but it did have a culture where problems festered because too many players feared speaking out,” according to a copy of the report obtained Thursday by The Washington Post.

 

The commission found that “during Mr. Durkin’s tenure, the Athletics Department lacked a culture of accountability, did not provide adequate oversight of the football program, and failed to provide Mr. Durkin with the tools, resources, and guidance necessary to support and educate a first-time head coach in a major football conference.”

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2018/10/25/report-maryland-football-culture-cites-problems-stops-short-toxic-label/

Laser Wolf

October 25th, 2018 at 2:21 PM ^

“The commission found that the Maryland football team did not have a ‘toxic culture,’ but it did have a culture where problems festered because too many players feared speaking out.”

That sounds like the textbook definition of a toxic culture. 

ijohnb

October 25th, 2018 at 2:23 PM ^

Could have done without Harbaugh being named in the report as who Durkin "modeled his program after," along side Urban Meyer. 

ijohnb

October 25th, 2018 at 3:26 PM ^

To be clear, I wasn't implying that that the Maryland program was like Michigan's.  I was more saying that the report is kind of "bush league" in that it essentially name drops other coaches to make it look like that kind of conduct is routine when it clearly is not.

Also, I had not seen that video before.  That is really cool.

Goggles Paisano

October 25th, 2018 at 5:06 PM ^

Rondale Moore is from Louisville.  When I watch that guy play I'm like...."how in the hell did everyone whiff on him"?  Turns out he is from Louisville and thus followed Brohm to Purdue.  He apparently could have gone anywhere he wanted to including Bama.  I guess my point is that Brohm has very strong ties to Louisville which is what you said.  

With that said though, he could get some looks at some bigger P5 schools.  

mgowill

October 25th, 2018 at 2:28 PM ^

“Mr. Court would attempt to humiliate players in front of their teammates by throwing food, weights, and on one occasion a trash can full of vomit,”

Trash can full of vomit. Maryland football is ass. Durkin should leave. 

mgowill

October 25th, 2018 at 2:39 PM ^

I’m skeptical after reading the article that Durkin was getting the vomit trash can reports daily. If only he had known he could have taken some action. As it stands, people were not getting him the vomit trash can reports so he clearly is not culpable. 

jsquigg

October 25th, 2018 at 5:53 PM ^

For all the talk about these kids' judgments and self righteous guffawing about entitlement, it would seems that the reason a coach didn't get his ass kicked is because of the repercussions that would impact "student athletes" if they were to do so.  The power dynamic is so tilted towards coaches because of money that it would absolutely ruin anyone who attacked a coach, regardless of justification, because the narrative would be spun against the athlete no matter what actually happened.  We laud Fort Schembechler, but it is an insulated culture that gives all the power to coaches that births cultures that happen at Maryland or Happy Valley, or East Lansing.  I'm not saying that the same thing is happening in AA, but we have little to no idea what happens inside the program when the cameras aren't running.  We should almost be more skeptical the squeakier it looks.  Instead we have a culture where the institution defends the programs because the programs basically fund the institution.    

grumbler

October 25th, 2018 at 10:22 PM ^

The power balance is not tilted towards the coaches because of money, it is tilted towards the coaches because they control access to all of the things the player wants:  playing time, preparations for a pro career, public recognition, etc.  That's as true in lower levels and was as true back when head coaches were making the salaries of factory managers.

And the claim that the University of Michigan football/basketball programs "basically fund the institution" is laughable.  The few million that the athletic programs send to the institution are a drop in a $2 billion bucket.

Leaders And Best

October 25th, 2018 at 2:31 PM ^

I have my doubts they keep him, and it is hard to bring him back now after he has been suspended for a season. I think this is an attempt to reduce their legal liability in the McNair case and reduce damage to their reputation (especially if they are going to have to shop for a new head football coach).

The one argument working against this would be that they would be able to avoid any buyout if they build a case that Durkin was at fault.

Mr Miggle

October 25th, 2018 at 4:32 PM ^

I'll go ahead and suggest that the people writing the report didn't care at all about Durkin's buyout. It's also all but impossible to limit their legal liability with regard to McNair's death. Their president already accepted that they were completely at fault and this doesn't change that one bit. It's just a question of which of their employees deserve how much of the blame. The settlement won't be higher if Durkin was at fault.

This does seem to lay the groundwork for bringing Durkin back if they want to. I agree that would seem to be a poor decision, for multiple reasons. The PR would be terrible and the locker room would be divided. Is Matt Canada really just going to be the OC after spending his only season as HC? And Durkin's biggest, I'd say clearly his only, strength as a HC, has been his ability to recruit. Good luck with maintaining that.