LFG Shirt - Why I am (unfortunately) Not Buying

Submitted by AdamBomb on June 23rd, 2019 at 2:08 AM

I LOVE the new "LFG" shirt. I want one. But after I clicked "add to cart", I realized it's 100% cotton. That type of material shrinks, is rough, does not fit right, and is overall inferior to the tri-blend type of t-shirt that is popular these days. Mods, please take heed: Your consumers want the best possible product, and from this MGoConsumer, that is a tri-blend shirt. Please make it an option for all of your products to be purchased as a tri-blend type of shirt. Even if it means paying an extra $5.

I believe this is a huge reason why people on here hate Nike shirts. Because they're 100% cotton. They age like Mickey Rourke.

I've purchased this tri-blend type of shirt from your store before. It was the "The Worst State Ever" shirt, and I'm still wearing it proudly 5+ years later. Just my two cents...

As always, Go Blue!!

Attikus

June 23rd, 2019 at 2:58 AM ^

Cotton is way better for the environment than tri-blend plastics. Now go back to asking for the manager at Target and a buy a new shirt every few years.

MichiganG

June 23rd, 2019 at 10:56 AM ^

Actually, not true.  Cotton is horrible for the environment.  Studies have shown it is significantly worse than plastics.  Ironically, organic cotton is much worse than non-organic.

https://www.wri.org/blog/2017/07/apparel-industrys-environmental-impact-6-graphics

While this shows that the one area where cotton is better is in per-unit greenhouse emissions, but because cotton doesn’t last as long, this is generally negated by how quickly cotton garments need replacement (when compared with plastic). 

Pepper Brooks

June 23rd, 2019 at 9:35 PM ^

oh, in the link you provided I did not see any reference to polyester and lycra taking hundreds of years to biodegrade, but I did see this:

While synthetic fibers like polyester have less impact on water and land than grown materials like cotton, they emit more greenhouse gasses per kilogram. A polyester shirt has more than double the carbon footprint of a cotton shirt (5.5 kg vs. 2.1 kg, or 12.1 pounds vs 4.6 pounds). Polyester production for textiles released about 706 billion kg (1.5 trillion pounds) of greenhouse gases in 2015, the equivalent of 185 coal-fired power plants' annual emissions.

MichiganG

June 25th, 2019 at 10:06 AM ^

In the off chance you still see this...

Yes, I referenced this in my initial post.  If you adjust the greenhouse gas emissions by the durability of the material then cotton and plastic are similar from a greenhouse perspective, but cotton is still considerably worse in every other regard.

There are other studies that are easy to find on cotton vs. plastics and the time to decomposition.  Recently, there have been many studies looking at reusable cotton (canvas) bags vs. plastic bags (grocery shopping) and the finding has been that you'd need to reuse the cotton bags over 7000 times to offset the disadvantages of the cotton (over 20,000 times if the cotton is organic).  That's the equivalent of a weekly shopping trip over the course of... 140 years (or 400 years if organic). The one thing these studies don't take into account is the impact of all the plastic that ends up in the ocean (versus landfill, which they do take into account).  But if we could keep plastics out of the ocean then it's a much better option than cotton from an environmental perspective.

ThePolishFalcon

June 23rd, 2019 at 3:53 AM ^

I like cotton.  After a few washes, cotton gets nice and soft. 

And I think Nike is more dry-fit.   I think Colosseum uses more cotton than Nike. 

901 P

June 23rd, 2019 at 7:43 AM ^

Ten years younger but count me in with the cotton. I coach for our youth baseball league and a few years ago they switched over to dry-weave for the coach shirts. I keep my old cotton ones and wear them all the time The new ones sit in my drawer, all bunched up and stuff because they are impossible to fold—it’s like holding an eel. 

Cant believe we are having a thread in this topic-and I’m contributing to it! OT season indeed. 

chatster

June 23rd, 2019 at 8:56 AM ^

LFG? Loving Feels Great?  Lose Fat Gradually? Lost Forgotten Graveyards? Let Felicia Go? Leaping Female Gorillas? Lemon Flavored Granola?  Loose Flatulence Generator?  Lumberjacks For Growth?  Leopards Flying Ground? Liberian Freighter Group? Let’s Find Grandpa? Lice Fireflies Gnats? Low Flying Groundhogs? Lithuanian Free Gynecologists? Luscious Freaking Gravy? Ludwig F. Grthwodzylcker?

Acronyms. SMH.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1zy9MW8CkA