Danwillhor

September 1st, 2013 at 7:56 AM ^

but what do you mean? Are you saying that them getting cut is proof or validation of Michigan's recent (I'm guessing you mean mostly under the last regime, if so) on field struggles? Swear no snark and legit question based on confusion. If that is what is being proposed I politely disagree in that those players were at worst above average players at UM and some great college players just don't fit the league.

Danwillhor

September 1st, 2013 at 7:44 AM ^

was a cap cut and NE had another good punter making less. He will take someone's punting job as he is still a top 10-15 (at worst) in the league. Money is the issue there. Molk, I think, is just that typical great college center who was smaller but scrappy and tough as nails. Many came out of Minnesota under Mason but they don't always translate to the league.

UofM626

September 1st, 2013 at 12:59 AM ^

To me seemed like a eyebrow raiser but my buddy said he was buried on the depth chart and never got a chance. He's a analyst at a sports agency in Cali, I texted him and one of his Agent buddies said he just never got a chance to get reps and was having issues w reads.