John Arbeznik Interview on 105.1Sports
Here's an interview I found from former captain John Arbeznik. It's a good listen. He talks about the letter that has been debated in several threads:
http://www.detroitsports1051.com/drewlane/2014/09/26/john-arbeznik-talk…
Summary:
He says that there is a letter and that the letter was signed by 30-40 former players (not 400+). There is a list of grievances that exceeds what was disclosed on the Henson blog. The email that was disclosed by Henson is not the letter - it was a running email intended to record the former player opinions (My sense is that one of the other players leaked it to Henson). John admits that the letter has been presented to the regents and that Stephan Ross has met with the new president to discuss his concerns.
September 27th, 2014 at 7:58 AM ^
Any chance you could briefly summarize what he says in the interview for the benefit of those of us who are VERY interested in what he said but unable to listen to the link?
That would be awesome.
September 27th, 2014 at 8:07 AM ^
He says that there is a letter and that the letter was signed by 30-40 former players (not 400+). There is a list of grievances that exceeds what was disclosed on the Henson blog. The email that was disclosed by Henson is not the letter - it was a running email intended to record the former player opinions (My sense is that one of the other players leaked it to Henson). John admits that the letter has been presented to the regents and that Stephan Ross has met with the new president to discuss his concerns.
September 27th, 2014 at 8:15 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 8:18 AM ^
Ok that makes perfect sense to me now. And it explains why the seemingly crazy "reminds me of Adolph Hitler" point was made. The letter is being circulated and everybody who gets it probably adds a comment and somebody was trying to be funny. It also explains why some of the 20 points were complete thoughts and some were simply fragments. And my guess is that Henson got his copy when only 20 players had recieved it and now the number is up to 40 which is why the list is larger than the 20 "issues" originally reported. It's still growing. What Henson had wrong was that it hadnt been given to the Regents/Ross yet and was till being built.when he posted it on his blog.
September 27th, 2014 at 8:18 AM ^
The list of grievances seems based on an email was forwarded around and each person added one or two things, not that everyone agreed with all the other claims on the list. And Arbeznik seems pissed about Brandon but also the performance of the team and doesn't think the current coaching staff is up to the job.
September 27th, 2014 at 10:08 AM ^
A list of grievances you say? Festivus has finally hit the mainstream!
September 27th, 2014 at 8:22 AM ^
is on. Not to mention the other big donors like Al Glick, J. Ira and Nicki Harris, etc. Concerns could be anything from "if we change Brandon, we're more likely to change Hoke, and thus add to transition time", to the players and fans have decided that Brandon has strayed too far from the moral philosophy and values of Michigan football culture, and if you don't let him go and find someone to bring everyone back into the fold, you are likely to have a huge expense on your hands down on State Street as the revenues decline.
September 27th, 2014 at 8:22 AM ^
Were they asking for Shane to start?
/s
September 27th, 2014 at 8:24 AM ^
My goal is to one day be rich enough, and donate enough to the University, that I get to personally sit down with the president to discuss my concerns about sports.
September 27th, 2014 at 8:24 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 8:44 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 27th, 2014 at 9:00 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 27th, 2014 at 9:45 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 8:27 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 8:30 AM ^
Not even Stephen Ross likes losing to Utah at home.
September 27th, 2014 at 8:33 AM ^
So do we think Arbeznik is the former co-captain that forwarded this email to Henson? If so, he should be upset with the way Henson portrayed it. And it seems the Hitler comment was not Henson's but one of the former players. Obviously Brandon seems like he is in a very weakened position now, but the whole thing reflects poorly on Michigan, including the former players with the way Henson portrayed this.
September 27th, 2014 at 9:08 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 8:35 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 8:40 AM ^
I would think has a bit stronger voice than a group of disgruntled players. The guy has his name on the B-school and made a silly good donation to Ath Dept with possibly more to give.
It wouldn't surprise me if the wow experiences get fewer and far between for awhile as sort of an organizational reaction to the press surrounding all of this.
What I don't have a good grasp of is whether the greater populus of people dislike Brandon as a singular entity or if its a tool to more quickly pry Brady Hoke from his position. I'm in the first category but only because I'd rather the football game played speak for itself, not the program trying to fly flags and play trumpet fanfares (in sort of a medieval analogy to the concept of "hey look at me!!") from all the parapets at every occasion.
The nearly undisguised goal of jacking every fan for greater revenue in the last couple of years I think has put a lot of bad taste in a lot of peoples' mouths so to speak. And I think its just the conditions now that has caused this to boil over at least in the general populus.
It will be interesting to see what management style Schlissel has and how he views the relationship between the academic side and the athletic side, as he sort of has a unique opportunity to put his stamp on the direction going forward. I suspect its very low key on the surface and anything ever said will be behind closed doors and not to the media.
September 27th, 2014 at 8:50 AM ^
It's just an interesting thing to consider...if Schlissell talks to the athletes themselves and many of the coaches, I think there will be very strong support for Brandon.
September 27th, 2014 at 9:34 AM ^
regarding Brandon from athletes of certain non-revenue sports. Brandon has fired/not renewed a handful of coaching contracts over the last couple years, and, (from what I recall) some of those coaches were successful and well-liked.
September 27th, 2014 at 11:46 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 9:25 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 8:44 AM ^
These bubble to the surface in times like these as the talk radio hosts actively seek the disgruntled types out because they know it will turn into a media story itself. There is a reason why Micheal Taylor all of a sudden appears on the radio this week.
September 27th, 2014 at 9:43 AM ^
that, in this case, there are only "30-40 disgruntled ex-players" as you seem to suggest. While I have no way of knowing for sure, there seems to be so much unhappiness with Brandon across the entire spectrum of Michigan supporters (lettermen & women, alumni, donors, fans, season (and ex-) ticketholders, faculty and staff, etc.), that I think it's wrong to assess this as merely the cronic complainer group stirring the pot.
September 27th, 2014 at 11:50 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 9:00 AM ^
It's a shame that the email was forwarded to a shock jock instead of the letter to someone like John U. Bacon.
September 27th, 2014 at 9:07 AM ^
I'm sure whoever forwarded it sent it to someone they thought would both protect their identity and publicize the letter. It seems like both objectives were realized.
September 27th, 2014 at 9:39 AM ^
Well, that may be true, but copying and pasting part of the email list without the context that this was just an email that was sent around and explayers added to, some serious points, some not and in no way was there a sense that there was agreement or support for all the points. It looks like a clown show (not surprising for a shock jock) instead of a list of reasoned and verifiable concerns about Dave Brandon and the direction of the Athletic Department, which I'm assuming the letter to the president was based upon.
September 27th, 2014 at 9:13 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 9:15 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 9:43 AM ^
I would imagine Schlissel probably concedes - even if grudgingly - that football and athletics in general are a huge part of the University's identity. Of course, football would be the most prominent among them here and it is entirely possible that there could be a point where performance on the field where donors feel "less inclined", if you will, or give a little less at the very least. We talked about it a bit yesterday in a thread and the question became one of the letterman being instrumental in activating some of the donors and what happens if this process slows, if you will. Is that a critical point where the Regents and Schlissel start to think about a Brandon-less future? It's an interesting question, if there is this much disenchantment from various groups.
September 27th, 2014 at 9:53 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 9:20 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 9:36 AM ^
Dear Mr. Ross,
Please sit down in a room with Mr. Jim Harbaugh, throw 50 mil on the table and make him say no.
September 27th, 2014 at 11:45 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 12:34 PM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 2:23 PM ^
Mr. Ross sitting down with Mr. Harbaugh and throwing money on the table would be a serious tampering violation of NFL rules, regardless of what team he is attempting to lure him to. Someone else will have to be the one to pull in Mr. Harbaugh.
September 27th, 2014 at 9:39 AM ^
His opinion is going to hold a ton of weight with Schlissel and the regents
September 27th, 2014 at 2:37 PM ^
Ross will go along with whatever decisions are made, he is more a tool then anything else.
September 27th, 2014 at 10:00 AM ^
Not trying to be "that guy" either but my fiancé is in a grad program in AA and I don't want to get into too many details but her professor works for the athletic department as well in a prominent role that I can't get into and he told her class that Hoke is probably gone after this year because his leadership is lacking significantly.
September 27th, 2014 at 10:33 AM ^
Sounds credible.
September 27th, 2014 at 10:04 AM ^
I've no idea of the validity and I'm wondering if others have heard the same. Schlissel is an academic and there's a thought that he's interested in significantly de-emphasizing athletics - therefore, a letter to him may embolden him, but to what direction for the athletics program nobody really knows.
Mary Sue was always interested in the perspective of the students, and having come from Iowa, knew the role of athletics in big college (B1G) life. If I recall correctly, Schlissel has no such point of reference in his background. I've heard he doesn't engage with students the same way, just the academics (students please confirm).
While Brandon has failed (to-date) at our marquee sports program, many of the others are in a much greater place than they were before his arrival. It should be no shock that he covets National Championships, and the Director's Cup trophy, over other things (athletes and coaches please confirm). And I do know from meeting him, he values player development as one of his top measures of what's to come. He told me years ago that Belien clearly develops players (this was before JB won a B1G), and pointedly implied RR did not.
Apologies for rambling a bit, but net-net, I'm interested in whether others have heard that we have a signficant risk in the direction Schlissel may take athletics. And who would be your chosen successor to Brandon. Someone like Jeremy Foley? Or a "Michigan Man"? Is Ward Manuel ready?
September 27th, 2014 at 10:02 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 27th, 2014 at 10:39 AM ^
I hope everyone enjoys the next 5 years of our AD Dave Brandon running the show.
September 27th, 2014 at 10:45 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 10:52 AM ^
September 27th, 2014 at 11:20 AM ^