Harbaugh with no Luck
This is an honest question for those who know Stanford football better than me. Would Jim Harbaugh be able to replicate his Stanford success at Michigan with no Andrew Luck ?
I am as big of a Harbaugh fan as anyone but I wonder how much of his Stanford success was due to Andrew Luck. I know it took a few years for him to dig Stanford out of its hole when he got there, but things got exponentially better after Luck arrived.
Who would be his Luck here ? No disrespect to the current QBs but: Shane Morris? Messiah De Weaver ?
I think he would have to recruit an elite QB after he got here to really get things going.
November 4th, 2014 at 9:43 PM ^
Couple this with the fact that if Harbaugh comes here, every top QB recruit in the country will give Michigan some serious consideration.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 4th, 2014 at 9:54 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 4th, 2014 at 10:00 PM ^
you have somehow turned a negative into a positive..or is it a negative to a positive ?
November 4th, 2014 at 9:59 PM ^
San Diego University relevant in football.
2004 7-4
2005 11-1
2006 11-1
November 4th, 2014 at 10:01 PM ^
November 4th, 2014 at 10:09 PM ^
and some stuff I didnt know about his tenure at Stanford & San Diego. As always, Thank you.
November 4th, 2014 at 10:20 PM ^
So you are suggesting that what Harbaugh did at Stanford was all Luck?
November 4th, 2014 at 10:22 PM ^
I am not
November 4th, 2014 at 10:47 PM ^
Sorry, I was trying to drop a pun here.
November 4th, 2014 at 10:58 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 5th, 2014 at 1:09 AM ^
Got what?
November 5th, 2014 at 2:10 AM ^
You missed it.
November 5th, 2014 at 1:36 PM ^
Huh, huh?
November 4th, 2014 at 10:37 PM ^
November 4th, 2014 at 10:41 PM ^
Stanford got good, and stayed good after Harbaugh left, because he recruited Luck and Martin and DeCastro and a bunch of defensive players.
Coaches don't make teams good. Especially in college. They can make them better, but they can't make them good. Harbaugh's record at Stanford was shitty his first 2-3 years because of what he inherited. It was awesome his last year and for three years after that because of what he built (shocking that things have started to slip now that the Harbaugh recruits are leaving campus).
Who knows what would happen in the first three years if he comes to Michigan. And nobody should fucking care. In year four and beyond we'd probably be awesome, because that is what the guy does. As long as we don't fire him like we did the last good coach we hired, we'll be fine.
November 4th, 2014 at 10:59 PM ^
Probably.
November 5th, 2014 at 1:12 AM ^
Winning makes "ain't" sound quaint.
November 5th, 2014 at 2:28 AM ^
I'm sure recruits would care if you tell them that the program is going to suck for 3 years, but oh boy, just wait to year 4! The next coach of Michigan needs to show up and win, not spend 3 years losing and trying to tell us how good things are going to be in 4 years. Fortunately, I doubt Harbaugh is as comfortable with spending 3 years losing as our last good coach.
November 4th, 2014 at 11:10 PM ^
football, especislly in this era is built around the talent at QB. Denard was not a great QB, but a spectacular athlete that RR used to perfection asn was starting to win here despite all the holes in the defense.
OSU would be a mess if it wasn't for the natural talent of Miller and BArrett (Herman is a huge help there).
Miss. State = Prescott. I could go on and on. Jim Harbaugh could do wonders here with the QB talent we already have. If this adnministration fails again on this coaching search, it will be dark for many years at the corner of Stadium and Main.
November 5th, 2014 at 12:29 AM ^
He won a championship with Greg McElroy. Or really any QB that played for LSU.
November 4th, 2014 at 11:37 PM ^
November 4th, 2014 at 11:38 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 5th, 2014 at 12:01 AM ^
Harbaugh took over in 2007 and Luck signed in 2008. Harbaugh might not have been his first contact with Stanford, but he didn't run him off either.
November 5th, 2014 at 12:10 AM ^
November 5th, 2014 at 12:21 AM ^
to 3 conference titles and a Super Bowl. He also had a great record at San Diego. So...yeah, he's fine.
November 5th, 2014 at 12:28 AM ^
Has won at every level with an array of different QB's. Won at University of San Diego (which was a flatlining program before he got there). Won with Luck. Won with Alex Smith. Won with Kaepernick.
Also, Luck was a four star and ranked 4th out of pro-style qb's in his class (behind Blaine Gabbert, Dayne Crist, and Mike Glennon FWIW). So while he was certainly not a sleeper or diamond in the ruff, it's not like he came to Stanford as an NFL All-Pro. Hell, his floor was probably lower than Christian Hackenberg's.
November 5th, 2014 at 12:35 AM ^
November 5th, 2014 at 1:29 AM ^
Harbaugh's record speaks for itself. I'd love to be able to observe him coaching over a period of time, just so I can try to understand whatever gift it is that he has.
Maybe it's like Napolean said: "As for me, I have the gift of electrifying men."
I simply cannot comprehend how Harbaugh has been able to accomplish what he has. He seems to get more from the people who play for him than anyone else had been able to; and he keeps doing it wherever he goes.
November 5th, 2014 at 1:58 AM ^
Michigan has a lot more talent on their team, then the team Jim took over at Stanford his first season! Harbaugh will be tearing up the B1G by his second season. No doubt! I have Buckeye friends who are very worried about Harbaugh becoming Michigan's coach! Sparty fans are probably quite fearful as well!
November 5th, 2014 at 8:26 AM ^
November 5th, 2014 at 7:39 AM ^
Andrew Luck represents [instert any highly rated 4 star recruit]. Its not like Harbaugh 'made' him from 2-3 star talent. Luck would likely have developed in a lot of programs around the country.
With the talent Harbaugh would have at M and the kind of talent he would attract to a place like M, he would get whoever he wants. There is no reason he couldn't make Morris, Speight, Malzone or Weaver a solid if not terrific QB.
November 5th, 2014 at 8:27 AM ^
While i am usually as cautious as you before annointing someone KING, and love to dig into details finding things that counter someone being annointed KING....Harbaugh is KING.
Of course Luck helped. But one thing Harbaugh brings, which our team needs badly, is a toughness. Give me a tough football player any day over a strong one. Its all mental. He will immediately improve the toughness of both our lines....and one needs it a little more than the other.
Harbaugh will also exponentially develop our QB's. We dont need a blockbuster QB. We already have a few studs. Most programs would die to have what we have on our roster. They just need to be developed properly. Harbaugh will do this.
I hope Michigan can land him. I really, really do.
November 5th, 2014 at 10:20 AM ^
Not taking anything away from Harbaugh's coaching ability
, but isn't, or wasn't Luck's father a football coach? And Luck came to Stanford with a pretty good football IQ that Harbaugh coached up??November 5th, 2014 at 11:17 AM ^
He completely resurrected Alex Smith
November 5th, 2014 at 11:20 AM ^
I realize recruiting rankings aren't the end all be all but they are usually a pretty good indicator of how much potential talent is on a roster. Not all recruits pan out but unless UM and the recruiting services completely whiffed on the guys Hoke has recruited there should be a pretty good amount of players on the UM roster who should be good college football players. I don't think the next UM coach is walking into a situation where the cupboard is anywhere close to bare.
November 5th, 2014 at 11:20 AM ^
Try Wilton Speight....his film is pretty impressive and I think he will give Shane a ton of competition and in all likelihood, start next year.
November 5th, 2014 at 11:42 AM ^
I shouldn't disregard Wilton Speight. Bertween Morris, Speight & Malzone I think Harbaugh would have a lot to work with. I am confident he can develop any one of those guys into very good QBs.