reshp1

April 26th, 2019 at 1:24 PM ^

That pie chart is kinda misleading to, no? How many of the "not 4 or 5 star" guys get scholarships, how many get D1 offers, how many P5?

JimHimbaugh

April 26th, 2019 at 5:16 PM ^

Well shit, Maizen.  Let nobody say your narrative lacks consistency, or that you don't have a pin-hole-pure vision for its constant implementation.  Why you've chosen this hill to die on is beyond me, but there you are, day in and day out... dying.  I really hope it's rewarding in some way that I'm missing.

jblaze

April 26th, 2019 at 5:51 PM ^

This is because of any 3* kid gets an offer from a top Coach, they automatically get another star. 

See that QB from OSU that transferred. He was a 3* kid, with an average offer list and after Urban offered was bumped to a 4*

Also, what sucks about this type of analysis is that it’s done as a final rank, not as a rank at the time of commitment. When is the final ranking out even? July?

 

1201

April 26th, 2019 at 6:23 PM ^

13 of the first 20 picks last night were Top247 prospects with D. Bush just outside of it...somehow some still come to the conclusion that there isn't a strong correlation with recruiting rankings/ratings. Take a high school statistics course?

— Steve Lorenz (@TremendousUM) April 26, 2019

OwenGoBlue

April 26th, 2019 at 8:24 PM ^

So they totally missed on almost half of the first round by ranking those guys 400+?

Obviously awesome HS players are good to get as commits as a rule. Color me unimpressed with the services outside of that group. 

M-Dog

April 27th, 2019 at 11:25 AM ^

It's because for the most part, the recruiting services are putting the 4/5 star label on the guys with NFL-ready bodies.  That's what gets you a 4/5 star.

They are not really taking a wild guess on who will develop NFL football skills in 3 or 4 years. 

That's why they miss on so many 3-stars.  It's not so obvious who has the ability to be able to play in the league.