Five-Tool Head Coaches: Who has one?

Baseball pundits often talk about the five-tool player (i.e., one who excels at hitting for average, hitting for power, fielding, throwing, and running/speed). Applying a similar approach to college football head coaches, one might imagine a 5-tool analog along these lines:

1. In-game coaching/game planning/game management
2. Out-of-game/practice coaching (player skill development)
3. Recruiting
4. Fan/alumni/media-facing activities 
5. Student-athlete education (not only from an academic perspective, but character and personal development as well)

With this as a guide, I would argue only a small number of college coaches perform well in all five categories. For example, I believe Harbaugh is a five-tool guy with small qualifiers (e.g., intermittent clock management issues and quirkiness that may bother some) while James Franklin - mainly due to his overwhelming propensity for in-game head-scratchers - falls outside the designation. Similarly, Paul Chryst makes my list, but Urban Meyer misses the mark with the last category due to his own well-documented moral failings as well as multiple player and staff exploits.

That is not to say a team can’t have success on the field without a five-tool head coach. Obviously wins and losses are the ultimate bellwethers, and that might spark a discussion about another baseball term - WAP (wins against replacement). However, I suspect there is intrinsic value in the less tangible aspects of the job. Perhaps it’s an example of what is often described as Michigan arrogance, but I’d rather have Harbaugh than, say, Dabo Swinney.

What do you folks think about how various coaches stack up? Moreover, do you think it makes any significant difference when evaluating a head coach’s overall value to a school?