(FACETIOUS TITLE) Rutgers defeats Harbaugh, wins the war (per Steve Politi)
We lost, you guys. Per Steve Politi. Link below. Indeed, it is a sad day.
http://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/index.ssf/2016/06/why_jim_harbaughs_n…
[It actually isn't too bad an article. It reads like a man who just cannot get himself to compliment a vastly superior leader and coach. Even his criticisms are subjective (questioning the motives of the camp in general, namely Harbaugh's apparent ego). All in all, the theme seems to be "hey, maybe that wasn't so bad, after all. Maybe Harbaugh is dedicated to this cause."]
But whose talking about Rutgers besides Rutgers?
nobody. This is all Rutgers trying to make something out of nothing and this whole line about being like ohio state just because their HC had a cup of coffee with Herbs is laughable. What?? Redesign their jerseys and helmets again ..to be more buckeye-like?? lol
New Jersey State University
There's been several 100+ posts in here in the last week alone that aren"t "FU Delaney for getting Rutgers" posts. I don't recall any of them in the Pre-Harbaugh era.
But that's not generating any sort of buzz for Rutgers outside of the scorn and mockery coming from MICHIGAN fans..
I'd say Schiano was the best thing ever to happen to RU football and that he should have stayed
/s
http://www.app.com/story/sports/college/rutgers/2016/06/09/ray-rice-chr…
I suppose this is what you have to settle for when you can't win football games
Is it really a war if one party doesn't even realize you are fighting with him?
after OSU takes some of their recruits. I hope they don't think OSU was there to help Rutgers.
That title is soo deceiving it made me click here first, anyway what the hell made you write Rutgers defeats Harbaugh, wins the war and then point at Steve Impoliti. I do know what facetious means, I just don't know why you would make a facetious title. When the article seems to point at Harbaugh beginning to win the war (of Satellite fiasco).
I think a title that goes something like: Harbaugh slowly bringing critics on board, or Steve Impoliti sounding more like he's getting it. Harbaugh slowly making Rutgers fans seem silly. Harbaugh making strides with critics. Anyone of those titles would have got me to click your post just as fast, not to mention they would reflect more honestly what the guy was trying to say IMO. So you got hammered with negs I gave you one not because this wasn't worthy of its own thread but because this title deserved it.
That title is soo deceiving it made me click here first, anyway what the hell made you write Rutgers defeats Harbaugh, wins the war and then point at Steve Impoliti. I do know what facetious means, I just don't know why you would make a facetious title. When the article seems to point at Harbaugh beginning to win the war (of Satellite fiasco).
I think a title that goes something like: Harbaugh slowly bringing critics on board, or Steve Impoliti sounding more like he's getting it. Harbaugh slowly making Rutgers fans seem silly. Harbaugh making strides with critics. Anyone of those titles would have got me to click your post just as fast, not to mention they would reflect more honestly what the guy was trying to say IMO. So you got hammered with negs I gave you one not because this wasn't worthy of its own thread but because this title deserved it.