The Paper Turned Blue!

Submitted by Meeechigan Dan on

My earlier thread discussing the accountability of RR and his staff received mixed reviews. Given the interpretation that I was negative about the prospects for the 2010 season, this post will seem bipolar. It is not bipolar, as my last post was a positive statement about accountability and even stated that I expected 8 wins this year. I was too timid.

I believe Michigan will win 9 games, and, no, I have not begun drinking yet today. I actually would offer the following prediction range:

7 wins – 9%
8 wins – 15%
9 wins – 60%
10 wins – 15%
11+ wins – 1%

And I have not taken any drugs today. In truth, I have surpassed the Mathlete with exhausative calculations…

…but while I give you a glimpse of my Beautiful Mind, I will not (i.e., cannot) explain the science behind it all. I can, however, translate these definitive probabilities into human terms.

I coach sports at a very high level: 6 to 12 year olds. One thing I have learned from a decade of that and my overall sports experience is that success, in the short term, is less about Talent and more about Will. Now, this is no great revelation, and I am equally certain that the REPLY button is smoking as the “Talent matters” crowd jumps into action. And indeed, over the long haul, Talent matters. Thus, in 2009, Michigan Willed itself to a 5-2 start with two close losses (yes, and close wins, too), but then, in the middle rounds of the fight, fatigue, reality and lack of Talent overcame them.

So while Will trumps Talent in the short term, Talent trumps Will in the long term. And usually, the Talent with a Will wins it all.

Is this post going anywhere?

Let me use eye-pleasing bullets to speed things along.

  • Teams do not respect Michigan anymore. Teams will expect to beat Michigan. That is when danger strikes, when Appy State and Toledo and Boise all rise up and teach painful lessons. Michigan, now better, will be taking on the teaching role early this season after being the student much the last two years.
  • Will (motivation, team, underdog role, us-against-the-world) is going to propel Michigan over top of UConn and to a 5-1 start (sorry, I think ND’s offensive maturity, even in a new system, is going to allow them to win a shootout). It could be 6-0, however, but because I am a noted naysayer, I put forth 5-1 (wins against UConn, UMass, BG, Indiana, MSU).
  • At this point of the season, Michigan’s Talent will be in a different place than 2009. At mid-season 2009, the following players were not potential contributors, where in 2010 they will be:

Name Pos. Yr. Exp. Ht./Wt. Hometown (last school)

3 Jeremy Gallon WR Fr. RS 5-8/171 Apopka, FL (Apopka)
4 Cameron Gordon S Fr. RS 6-3/208 Detroit, MI (Inkster)
5 Vladimir Emillen S So.  6-1/202 Lauderhill, FL (Plantation)
6 Je'Ron Stokes WR So.  6-0/187 Philadelphia, PA (Northeast)
7 Devin Gardner QB Fr.  6-4/203 Oak Park, MI (Inkster)
7 Brandin Hawthorne S So.  6-0/202 Pahokee, FL (Pahokee) 
8 Terrance Robinson WR So. RS 5-9/173 Klein, TX (Oak)
12 J.T. Floyd CB So. RS 6-0/183 Greenville, SC (J.L. Mann) 
14 Teric Jones S So.  5-9/194 Detroit, MI (Cass Tech)
15 Thomas Gordon S Fr. RS 5-11/208 Detroit, MI (Cass Tech)
15 Michael Cox RB So. RS 6-0/215 Dorchester, MA (Avon Old Farms)
17 Jeremy Jackson WR Fr.  6-3/196 Ann Arbor, MI (Huron)
26 Isaiah Bell LB Fr. RS 6-1/237 Youngstown, OH (Liberty) 
27 Mike Jones LB So.  6-2/207 Orlando, FL (Edgewater)
28 Fitzgerald Toussaint RB Fr. RS 5-10/199 Youngstown, OH (Liberty)
33 Stephen Hopkins RB Fr.  6-0/236 Double Oak, TX (Marcus)
34 Brendan Gibbons K Fr. RS 6-0/245 West Palm Beach, FL (Cardinal Newman)
44 Mark Moundros FB Sr. RS 6-1/234 Farmington Hills, MI (North)
45 Obi Ezeh LB Sr. RS 6-2/240 Grand Rapids, MI (Catholic Central)
50 David Molk OL Jr. RS 6-2/270 Lemont, IL (Lemont Township)
56 Ricky Barnum OL So. RS 6-3/284 Lakeland, FL (Lake Gibson)
57 Elliott Mealer OL So. RS 6-5/310 Wauseon, OH (Wauseon)
64 Christian Pace OL Fr.  6-2/259 Avon Lake, OH (Avon Lake)
65 Patrick Omameh OL So. RS 6-4/293 Columbus, OH (St. Francis DeSales)
73 William Campbell DT So.  6-5/324 Detroit, MI (Cass Tech)
75 Michael Schofield OL Fr. RS 6-7/281 Orland Park, IL (Carl Sandburg)
76 Quinton Washington OL Fr. RS 6-4/307 St. Stephen, SC (Timberland)
77 Taylor Lewan OL Fr. RS 6-8/283 Scottsdale, AZ (Chaparral)
82 Ricardo Miller WR Fr.  6-4/212 Ann Arbor, MI (Pioneer)
83 Jerald Robinson WR Fr.  6-1/191 Canton, OH (South)
90 Anthony LaLota DE Fr. RS 6-4/263 Princeton, NJ (The Hun School)

  • This isn’t a precise list, but a general point illustrated by our current offensive line depth. Last year, the depth was thin and Molk’s injury exposed a lethal liability. This year, the OLine is deep, deep, deep. Those extra new contributors mean the world in avoiding positional meltdowns.
  • Now the long-haul has settled in. Michigan will then take three of the next four games with better talent than all but Iowa. At this point, we are 8-2 (wins against PSU, ILL and Purdue).
  • Then: Wisconsin and Evil. Hidden in the Mathlete’s world is something about probablilities, and it becomes harder and harder for Evil to keeping winning. I see a split of these games, hopefully winning the last OSU-Michigan November regular season matchup.

Book it, Meeechigan Dano says. 9-3.

Let the mocking begin!

(Note: If the secondary is hit by injuries, I revise to 2-10.)

Comments

RichRodFollower

September 1st, 2010 at 2:08 PM ^

This makes all the sense in the world to me.  When backed up with Meeechigan Dan facts, I don't know how this can be questioned!  Thanks for the positive reinforcements - very telling!

Meeechigan Dan

September 1st, 2010 at 3:00 PM ^

Well, I had an elaborately buried nerd reference in the first post that went uncommented upon, either because it was obvious and dumb, or too obscure.

I look at the Michigan football team, and I don’t see players, I see red litmus paper hovering over a solution know as UConn, that, if basic Michigan coaching is present, will turn that paper Blue.

Blue litmus turns red for an acidic solution and red paper turns blue for a basic solution. I was testing to see if "basic" coaching was present, and, if it was, we would see it turn "Blue," which is synonomous for Michigan (that's why it's capitalized).

Bad, I know.

Topher

September 1st, 2010 at 2:13 PM ^

"I coach sports at a very high level: 6 to 12 year olds. One thing I have learned from a decade of that and my overall sports experience is that success, in the short term, is less about Talent and more about Will."

I coach at that age too and I concur, at least at that age. The team that knows their assignments and has the confidence to go full speed has a HUGE advantage over the opponent. This is why my team doesn't run many plays but reps them a lot and knows them in their sleep.

profitgoblue

September 1st, 2010 at 2:16 PM ^

Is anyone else out there just happy that its football season again?  Personally, after the past few years, I am placing the least importance on wins and losses than I ever have in my life.  I got spoiled by all of the wins and suffered greatly watching all of the losses the past two years.  I finally have my head on straight and am ready to simply enjoy the game and not get caught up in winning.  Winning isn't everything, right?

IronDMK

September 1st, 2010 at 2:21 PM ^

One thing that bothers me though about this week: we broke so many records (bad records!) in the past two years that I thought, "Ok, there are no more records to break."  Well, UConn has never beaten Rich Rod.  So there's that.  BUT... I do think that this year we get off the schneid and that particular record will not be tarnished.  I think we will beat UConn by a margin of 10pts.  I'll take it.

I'm infiltrating the UConn section for this game.  Hey, that's 2 tickets their fans could not buy!

hailvictors1970

September 1st, 2010 at 2:40 PM ^

I have to believe that sheer rage & revenge will show through this year. You cannot plan for that as a coach. In that respect "WILL" beats talent,because it's rage unstoppable rage!!! The defense needs to play smash mouth, nasty, angry football, like when they TEE'd OFF on TEBOW in '08!!! If the defense improves a little,just a couple of three & outs thats a 7 to 10 point swing. Purdue, Iowa, Mich St. are all wins AND if they eliminate the turnovers you can add Ohio St. to the win column last year!!!! 9 -3 very possible

stillMichigan

September 1st, 2010 at 3:55 PM ^

I agree with the fact everyone wanted a piece of us while we were down. Now they may tend to overlook us a bit. When was the last time we were underrated?  97? , doesnt matter.  We actually have the will and more talent for sure than last 2 years, plus we may  be taken more lightly now than anytime since pre-Bo era. I see 8 wins at least.

OSUMC Wolverine

September 1st, 2010 at 4:40 PM ^

Dan I am in total agreement with you.  I think 9 wins is the most likely outcome this year.  The only thing I don't agree with is the shootout with ND in that they replaced 3 OL and have a QB that will be thinking about injury every minute for the first month of this season.  We should blitz and pressure until their heads are spinning.  Our offense also ripped them something terrible last year and our offense will likely have improved more year over year than their defense simply due to maturity and most importantly an offensive line with far more experience and size in the two deep.

NateVolk

September 1st, 2010 at 5:42 PM ^

I want to see lots of the team that lost to Iowa and Ohio State and not much of the one that lost to MSU. All reasonably close games, but that MSU game version would have lost all but two games last year. We damn near won it too.  (no greater indictment of State's program currently than that game. Sorta funny considering how they perceived it.)

It is that unsettled nature of all this that I struggle with. But I agree with you on experience. From there comes the stability.   I think we are tough tough out at Michigan Stadium and we get 7 games there.  Say turnovers are reasonable and sorta even statistically; not clownishly out of whack like last year, we can do 9.  I have no doubt about it.

HailGoBlue86

September 1st, 2010 at 6:19 PM ^

We are going to have so much more depth this year which is going to mean so much later in the season. Instead of collapsing like last year the new depth will insure that we win a good amount of November games.

bluesouth

September 1st, 2010 at 7:42 PM ^

you for all the words, names, numbers, and stuff.  Nice work seriously,  I believe something is not accounted for in your work on the comparison with Iowa.  Turnovers and how young players respond without "leaders" on the field and on the sidelines.  While on average Iowa had younger players I would speculate there were more leaders and more players that were all in for Iowa.  Rich Rod has spoken extensively re senior leadership being different this year and in deed the teams leaders spoke up and monitored voluntary practice this year. 

I'll reserve my prediction on the year.  These guys are really young especially on Def and particularly in the secondary.  Let's just hope your analysis is close  I'd settle for close.

ND Sux

September 2nd, 2010 at 7:10 AM ^

Not sure I agree that we will lose to ND.  Although I think Brian Kelly will be the best coach at ND since Holtz, there will surely be growing pains, especially with a new QB.  The Spartans are expected to be improved over last year, but so are we, and of course we have them at home.  Oh, and we're PISSED OFF!!!

I think we beat BOTH of those teams this year, assuming we HOTTDB.