The Game, 2019 Edition: What might it take for Michigan to win?

Submitted by BuckeyeChuck on November 29th, 2019 at 3:45 PM

Welcome to the 116th edition of The Game!

The Game is why I’m here. The Game is why I’ve been reading for ~12 years. The Game is why I’ve been posting for the past 2+ years. And The Game is why you’ll neg me. Because Rivalry.

We all know what’s at stake in terms of both championships & honor, so let’s get right to it.

What will determine the winner of The Game? The same thing that typically determines the winner of most football games played anywhere at any time: The Trenches.

The trenches, the trenches, the trenches.

Because I’m a numbers guy and not an X&O’s guy, I’ll leave the X&O’s to Seth & Brian who know more than I can comprehend. But I am Stat Geek, so I’m going to take a deep look at the numbers.

We all know that if Michigan is going to win this game, they will need to do some things that no other OSU opponent has done. So, what will Michigan need to do that no other team has yet been able to do?

(Click here to view the Google Sheet with all the good, yummy data.)

WHEN MICHIGAN HAS THE BALL

Rushing

Only two teams have rushed for more than 137 yards (sack-adjusted) against OSU: Northwestern for 166 and Nebraska for 207. Caveats:

  • NW got 166 yards because they ran it 46 times. (for 3.6 YPC)
  • Nebraska got to 207 because of garbage time. Nebraska’s last two possessions (after it was already 48-0) were 22 plays for 140 total yards. Prior to those last two possessions, Nebraska’s offense had 34 plays and moved the ball forward for only 101 total yards (net of both off. & def. penalties).

The offenses that more closely resemble Michigan (PSU & Wisc) went for 131 & 113. Therefore, if Michigan rushes for 150+, they’ll do something that basically hasn’t been done against OSU’s 1st team defense. That certainly doesn’t seem like a target that’s terribly out of reach for Michigan.

Michigan has rushed for more than 250 yards three times, so they’re certainly capable. However, against the defenses that more closely resemble OSU’s defense (Wisconsin, PSU, MSU, & Iowa) they ran for 55, 148, 126 & 135. Not once eclipsing the 150-yard mark. That might make a decent target threshold: if Michigan gets 150 yards, it should be a positive sign for them.

Five teams have rushed for at least 4.0 YPC (sack-adjusted) against OSU: they rushed for 4.0, 4.2, 4.5, 4.7 and…5.9! The 5.9 was Nebraska which, again, was mostly against 2nd, even 3rd, team defense. Some of those offenses benefitted by facing defensive backups for most (or all) of the 2nd half. More applicably, PSU and Wisconsin put up 4.2 & 3.9 respectively. So, 4.0 YPC for Michigan falls in line with that. If Michigan goes for 4.5 YPC, they’ll do something that no other team has done against OSU’s 1st team defense.

Michigan rushed for ~6.0 YPC on three occasions, the same three games they ran for over 250 yards. Against the closest comparisons (Wisconsin, PSU, Iowa & MSU), Michigan rushed for 3.2, 3.7, 4.4 & 4.2 YPC. About 4.0-4.5 is a decent target range for Michigan if they want to do good things.

Therefore, 150 yards rushing at ~4.5 YPC would be decent enough a rushing performance for Michigan to do against OSU what no other opponent has.

Passing

Only three teams have thrown for 200+ yards against OSU (despite the deficits these teams have had), none for more than 218. Michigan is definitely capable of passing for more yards than has any previous OSU opponent, particularly the post-resurgent Michigan which passed for 366 & 384 against non-slouch defenses Indiana & MSU. Michigan has passed for more than 218 yards eight times. But OSU has held seven opponents to no more than 128 yards passing, including PSU & Wisconsin.

OSU allowed 6.0 YPA three times: Indiana (6.0), Wisconsin (6.4; on only 17 attempts, completing 10), and Cincinnati (7.2). Given that OSU won those games 127-17, that’s not particularly telling. PSU, the closest comp to Michigan, passed for 4.6.

Michigan surpassed 7.2 YPA (the highest OSU has allowed) six times, three of them more than 11.0. Against Wisconsin, PSU, and Iowa, they passed for 6.2, 6.7 & 5.7 YPA; but that was all pre-resurgence. Against ND, MSU & Indiana, they threw for 9.6, 11.6 & 11.4 YPA.

The success of Michigan’s passing game is the best hope for Michigan fans that they can score enough to win. By OSU’s defensive standards, a 200-yard day at 6.0 YPA is to be expected. Based on Michigan’s recent success in the passing game, the standard is 300+ yards at ~11.0 YPA. That’s a big difference there!

If Michigan passes for 220 yards (I fully expect they will) at 7.5 YPA, that will be more successful than any opponent has been previously, but 300/8.0+ is definitely not out of the question.

Total Yards

OSU has not yet allowed 300 total yards this season (most = 285), nor has anyone averaged 5.0 yards per play (highest = 4.8). Only three teams eclipsed more than 4.0 YPP. The best offenses OSU faced (Indiana, PSU & Wisconsin) had 257, 227 & 191 total yards at rates of 3.8, 3.5 & 3.7 YPP. MSU did manage 285 yards @ 4.4 per play.

Michigan has exceeded 400 total yards seven times, 450+ five of those. Only twice has Michigan failed to average 4.8 YPP: Army & Iowa. They’ve gotten 7.0+ YPP four times, including each of the last two.

The bare minimum for Michigan to do more than any other OSU opponent is 300 total yards and/or 5.0 YPP.

If they do more than any other opponent both rushing (150 @ 4.5 YPC) and passing (220 @ 7.5 YPA) they’ll have at least 370 yards @ ~6.0 YPP, far and away more than anybody has done against OSU all year.

WHEN OHIO STATE HAS THE BALL

Rushing

OSU’s three lowest rushing totals (sack-adjusted) were 243, 234 & 221…against…uh…FAU, Miami (NTM) & Rutger. Because who cares. Against defenses that matter (PSU, Wisconsin, Indiana & MSU) they ran for 257, 300, 318 & 346. Twice they nearly got to 400 (vs. Nebraska & Maryland).

Michigan has allowed 200 yards only twice: Army (duh!) & Wisconsin (double duh!). The problem with the Wisconsin game is not that they got 200+, but that they got nearly double that: 370. Against Indiana, PSU, MSU, Iowa & ND they allowed only 115, 108, 76, 66 & 53. Michigan is certainly capable of holding decent offenses (not named Wisconsin) to around 100 yards rushing or less. If Michigan holds OSU to as few as 200 yards rushing, it will be the least amount of rushing yards OSU has gotten all season; 250 will be less than any relevant opponent.

OSU averaged more than 7.3 YPC five times; they were held under 6.0 YPC four times: three of them (5.9, 5.3 & 5.1) are the least-relevant defenses of all, the same three that held OSU under 250 yards. The other is PSU at 4.4. That becomes Michigan’s benchmark; to hold OSU under 4.4 YPC would be something no other opponent has done.

Michigan has held every opponent but one to 4.4 YPC or less (you can guess the one). If PSU’s defense did it, Michigan’s defense is certainly capable. <4.4 YPC it is.

Passing

OSU has thrown for more than 300 yards on three occasions, but none of them against a relevant defense; in no other game did they throw for more than 238 yards. Against MSU, Indiana, PSU, Wisconsin, and Northwestern, they threw for 206, 214, 188, 167 & 201; all seeming to hover around 200.

Eight of Michigan’s opponents have been held to less than 200 yards passing. Michigan’s pass rush & secondary are certainly capable of giving OSU problems, but expecting them to hold OSU under 200 yards passing may not be a fair expectation. After all, OSU has not had to throw much in the second half of most games, or they have been rushing the ball well they haven’t needed to throw. But if Michigan is able to hold OSU to under 200 yards passing (like PSU & Wisconsin did), they’ll do something few others have done.

Against irrelevant defenses, OSU passed for 12.5, 11.1, 9.6, 8.9 & 8.8 YPA; against Wisconsin, Indiana, MSU, PSU & Northwestern they passed for 7.6, 7.4, 8.2, 8.5 & 7.7 YPA. That’s all hovering around 8.0.

Michigan has held every opponent but one to 8.0 YPA or less. The lone exception? Army. (?) Holding OSU to 7.3 YPA or less is not unrealistic; OSU has been held close to that multiple times already and Michigan has already held PSU & Indiana to 7.3 & 7.5 YPA.

Total Yards

Four teams have held OSU to less than 500 yards: FAU (469), PSU (417), NW (480), and Wisconsin (431).

Those PSU & Wisconsin numbers are particularly relevant.

Michigan has held every opponent to under 500 yards. After we get past the 487 Wisconsin got, no other team has gotten more than 321 against Michigan; eight of them less than 300. Michigan’s defense is capable of holding OSU to ~400 yards; but they’re also capable of the Wisconsin gashing. If Michigan is to do something against OSU that no other opponent has done, they’ll hold OSU to 400 total yards.

OSU has been held to less than 7.0 YPP only three times, two of them are quite relevant: 6.0 vs. Wisconsin, 5.0 vs. PSU.

Michigan has held every opponent to less than 7.0 YPP. Wisconsin got 6.7 and PSU got 5.2, every other opponent sub-5.0. If PSU held OSU to 5.0 YPP, Michigan can also hold OSU to 5.0 YPP.

 

Tl;dr version:

If Michigan is going to win The Game, they’ll have to do some things that no other opponent has done against OSU. What are some of those things?

When Michigan has the ball…

150 rushing yards and/or 4.5+ YPC

220 passing yards and/or 7.5+ YPA

300 total yards and/or 5.0+ YPP

…if Michigan’s offense does any of these things, they’ll do more than OSU’s defense has allowed against any previous opponents.

When Ohio State has the ball…

250 rushing yards and/or <4.4 YPC

200 passing yards and/or <7.3 YPA

400 total yards and/or <5.0 YPP

…if Michigan’s defense prevents OSU’s offense from reaching any of these benchmarks, they will have done something no other relevant opponent has done.

LET' S GET IT ON!!!

Comments

JHumich

November 29th, 2019 at 3:59 PM ^

Neg dutifully applied, per your diary.

The current iteration of Michigan is on another level from anything you've faced this year. 

We're gonna hit you in the mouth like you haven't been hit.

And then we're going to do it again. And again. And again.

You'll be thankful that you get Minny/Wiscy the next week and don't have to see us again for a year.

Merlin.64

November 29th, 2019 at 4:34 PM ^

Statistics can be amusing to play with. It will be interesting to compare the data in your analysis to those accumulated during the game (sorry, I mean The Game).

I could ask my avatar for his prediction of the outcome, but I don't want to ruin the suspense. (And the dudes in Las Vegas wouldn't like it.)

Go Blue! Think Bahamas North!

 

Eng1980

November 29th, 2019 at 6:07 PM ^

Michigan is healthy for the first time in many years.

I recall how well the stat review worked last year.  "No relevant opponent"  phrase tells me you know the stats are not terribly indicative as to how this game will evolve.

Fields has never played in snow or played a tough opponent on the road.

Think Iowa at home at night and in  November.

If Michigan goes up 7-0 then expect Fields to follow with an interception on the following drive or Dobbins is stopped on 4th and 1 and the crowd goes wild.

Biggest worry for me is the expected rash of DPI/holding  by OSU DBs that goes without a flag.

Every year the Buckeyes lose big when they least expect it.  Well, expect it.

The Mad Hatter

November 29th, 2019 at 6:30 PM ^

Interesting numbers, and typically douchy condescension as expected from a buckeye.

I actually appreciate you posting this, but I still hate you, your family, everything you stand for, and that entire miserable shithole you call a state. And you're one of the good ones.

Go Blue.

jbuch002

November 29th, 2019 at 7:16 PM ^

Look, this game has nothing to do with the stats you posted. They are an end-product of a whole bunch of other stuff either going right or wrong for M. You missed that.

First do all the obvious standard shit right and force osu to make mistakes ....... you know score more points than your opponent. Heh.

More specifically .......

On Offense:

Gattis has to have a game plan that mitigates the disruptive effect chase young has on every offense that osu has played against.

Patterson and his receivers have to make plays on standard downs.

osu has to be forced to move their slot corner into the box because Harbaugh's trap run game is working and giving short yardage to move the chains and possess on 2nd or 3rd down.

On Defense:

Plenty have a different view but, IMO, you stop dobbins running inside by disallowing osu to "equate" (see urban meyer on Fox explain this) defenders v. blockers, M wins. 

Execute the doubles coverage scheme Brown introduced (See Neck Sharpies) to contain day's success from 2018 on WR or H-Receiver slants and drags.

Knock receivers off their routes at the snap and make the switches to avoid fields finding kj hill or chris olave one on one with a LB.

Get lucky by correctly doubling field's primary and secondary reads. Force the third read. Sack him.

LBs and Ss stay gap disciplined/sound if fields keeps/runs a draw 

 Other:

Be no less than +1 in turnovers. 

Punish osu after a big M stop or osu turnover by going long to Collins.

Don't try to protect a lead if M gets up by 2 or 3 scores.

Eng1980

November 29th, 2019 at 8:48 PM ^

Exactly, precisely, well said.  This was the expected plan for the last 4 weeks if not the whole season.  I am stll waiting for the Don Brown trap play to get a pick but maybe that was the defense a decade ago.

I hope M scores first.  I was fairly confident going into last year's game but starting with a three and out with an odd 3rd down play gave me an idea that the game may have been lost on the first series.

Teeba

November 29th, 2019 at 8:27 PM ^

How about we come out wearing Iowa or Purdue’s uniforms and convince the buckeyes this is just their annual road game they lose by 30? That would work for me.

Eph97

November 29th, 2019 at 9:13 PM ^

Shaun Wade's status is the only question mark for OSU. Should not be a close game, but in a rivalry anything goes.

I hope Urban interviews Harbaugh tomorrow before the game.

Beat Xichigan.

 

jbrandimore

November 29th, 2019 at 10:13 PM ^

I’m going to get negged for this, but I think we should pull a page or two from Mork and try to pull a special teams surprise. Fake a punt or FG. Onside kick whatever.

I think we need to carve out an extra possession or two, and that’s a way to do it.

 

In case Fields isn’t 100%, I would have someone spy him and destroy him on any RPO action, even if Dobbins gets some yards. We want Fields gun shy.

 

Then, try to consume as much time as possible in the 2nd qtr. OSU has been killing people in the 2nd and we still don’t know if they can play 60 minutes of football. People might say last week they did, but they weren’t effective against PSU in the 2nd half.

FrankTheTank

November 30th, 2019 at 6:43 AM ^

Fuck all the haters here. Here's an interesting stat: losing eight straight for the Wolverines hasn't happened in The Game since the years 1902-1909. You can thank Harbaugh for 5/8ths of this streak. Bye bitches...Oh and JT got the first down and Curtis Samuel scored a 15 yard TD the next play. LOL. I love your tears.

Eng1980

November 30th, 2019 at 11:20 AM ^

And there was no holding on the play before the spot.  And the absence of pass interference on the Michigan possession was corrrect.  And the DPI on  OSU's last regulation scoring drive was correct.  

I follow the team and I am a fan.  We learn more from playing the game than from winning the game.

And on a small point, I don't see you post much on basketball, baseball, track, or golf, or geez, any other sport.  I am very comfortable with the entire university and will not limit myself to football.  All is well in Ann  Arbor, win or lose.

aiglick

November 30th, 2019 at 8:48 AM ^

Good numbers to know although if Michigan hits those targets OSU would still have a huge yardage advantage. Would need to win turnover battle and be more efficient with our yard usage to win The Game.

freelion

November 30th, 2019 at 10:23 AM ^

Yardage is a data point but not determinant. Turnovers and explosive plays will be the deciding factor as it normally is in this game. Yardage helps in the field position battle if this turns out to be a slugfest. I think the biggest difference in recent years has been confidence. Michigan has been shaky for a dozen+ years. Is this the year they finally regain their confidence? It's yet to be seen but there are hints in recent weeks that it's coming.