Big Ten at 20 (Warning expansion related)

Submitted by ciszew on

Warning:  This post is about Big Ten Conference expansion.  If you are sick of this topic or do not care about this topic stop reading.  This post is not for you.

If you are intrigued by this topic, such as myself, feel free to continue. 

Additionally the ideas in this post are not all that original – the diary’s intention is more to talk these concepts out among Michigan friends who enjoy such conversation.    

Impetus:

In the last couple months there have been some rumors on the internets that conference expansion talks could heat up again.  And specifically that the Big Ten could go to 20 teams.  I am not an advocate for this at all.  I personally enjoyed the conference the most when it was at 11 teams. 

However this concept did spark my imagination – if further expansion was inevitable, and 20! was the number, how the hell would you have a legit conference work like that. 

My proposal for football:

1)   The conference would consist of 4 divisions

2)   All would still play a 12 game season, with two teams playing in the Big ten championship game for a 13th game.  The conference schedule would have to be expanded to 10 games.  Everyone would lose one of their Non-conference games.

3)   Each team would play their 4 other intra-division opponents every year. 

4)   Each team would play all 5 teams in an opposite division every year.  However, the division versus division match ups would rotate on a yearly basis.  

5)   The tenth game would be played against the equal seed (same standings) of  a predetermined opposite division opponent each year.  For example: There would be two 1 seed v 1 seed games, two 2 seed v 2 seed games, two 3 seed v 3 seed games, and so on.  Everyone would play a tenth game, even the 5 seeds versus the 5 seeds. 

6)   The two wining teams from the 1 seed v 1 seed games would then meet in the conference championship game

Possible schools for addition:

From the rumblings – and it is probably just wishful thinking/talk – the schools most likely to join the conference are as followed –

(Again I don’t think this is going to happen but these are the names thrown out there, presently and it the past)

Texas

Oklahoma

Georgia Tech

University of Virginia

Florida State

The 6th school is a little trickier.  My belief is if the Big Ten could secure the above schools they’d go after University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill with all they’ve got.  However I think UNC wouldn’t leave Duke behind, and more likely would end up in the SEC. 

Which would mean the Big Ten would fall back on University of Kansas (AAU member, connects Texas/OU to rest of Conference). 

Below I lay out both options, as well as the general concept of the schedule, and what Michigan’s schedule would look like in a 6 year span (when they would have played everyone home/away at least once). 

Thoughts?

Go Blue!

  East North West South    
Option 1 Florida ST Penn ST Wisc Texas    
Georgia Tech Mich Minn OU    
UNC MSU Iowa Nebraska    
UVA Ohio ST ILL IU    
Maryland Rutgers NW Pur    
             
  East North West South    
Option 2 Florida ST Mich Wisc Texas    
Georgia Tech MSU Minn OU    
UVA Ohio ST Iowa Nebraska    
Maryland Rutgers IU Kansas    
Penn ST NW Pur ILL    
             
             
  Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6
East Schedule North +West 10th game West + South 10th game South + North 10th game South + North 10th game West + South 10th game North +West 10th game
             
North Schedule East + South 10th game South +West 10th game West + East 10th game West + East 10th game South +West 10th game East + South 10th game
             
West Schedule South + East 10th game East + North 10th game North + South 10th game North + South 10th game East + North 10th game South + East 10th game
             
South Schedule West + North 10th game North + East 10th game East + West 10th game East + West 10th game North + East 10th game West + North 10th game
             
  Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6
  @MSU MSU @MSU MSU @MSU MSU
Option 1 UM Sched + 2 Non-Con games Rutgers @Rutgers Rutgers @Rutgers Rutgers @Rutgers
@FSU Texas @Wisc Wisc @Texas FSU
Ga Tech @OU Minn @Minn OU @Ga Tech
@UNC Nebraska @Iowa Iowa @Nebraska UNC
UVA @IU ILL @ILL IU @UVA
  @Maryland Pur @NW NW @Pur Maryland
  @Penn ST Penn St @Penn ST Penn St @Penn ST Penn St
  OSU @OSU OSU @OSU OSU @OSU
  South Seed @West Seed East Seed @East Seed West Seed @South Seed
             
  @MSU MSU @MSU MSU @MSU MSU
  Rutgers @Rutgers Rutgers @Rutgers @Texas @Rutgers
Option 2 UM Sched + 2 Non-Con games @FSU Texas @Wisc Wisc OU FSU
Ga Tech @OU Minn @Minn @Nebraska @Ga Tech
@Penn ST Nebraska @Iowa Iowa Kan Penn St
UVA @Kan IU @IU @ILL @UVA
@Maryland ILL @Pur Pur NW Maryland
  @NW NW @NW NW @NW NW
  OSU @OSU OSU @OSU OSU @OSU
  South Seed @West Seed East Seed @East Seed West Seed @South Seed
             
Pros            
In a 4 year span play everyone in conference at least once    
Regional rivals would continue        
Ten games, hence Big 10 (marketing angle)      
From a strategic standpoint you have contained or surrounded SEC    
Marquee games every weekend        
All teams have equal home/away games every year      
Academic standards have not been overly diminished.  Institutional cooperation enhanced.
Own huge swath of country/Media Markets        
Teams could continue to schedule non-conference rivals if they choose    
Winning divisions would be important, seeding would add intrigue    
Mich/OSU would take place before Thanksgiving again      
Clear/fair conference champion would be crowned      
Would be able to easily regionalize Big ten network - instead of 1 network expand to 4.  And possibly allow Big ten to buy out/absorb Longhorn Network
For the most part all States will be connected.  There will be a gap on either the southwest or southeast depending on who joins.
Recruiting territory would be greatly expanded.  Nebraska could hit up Texas again.  East coast teams would have better tools to sell Florida kids.
For basketball.  Everyone plays each other once -- then seeded Tourney for champion
             
Cons            
Besides regional rivals would other teams play each other enough to really be considered conference foes?
Travel at end of season could be difficult on fans      
Teams would no longer ever have 8 home games.  Lose a 3rd Non-Conference game/guaranteed gate
UM/OSU would not be last game of year        
There is a possibility although not likely that the Big Ten Champion could have a losing or .500 record
Inevitably the division balance could be uneven.  West would need Wisc/Iowa to be a power. 
             
             
             

 

Comments

RainbowSprings

February 1st, 2016 at 5:51 PM ^

we could "trade" Maryland for Virginia Tech, and Rutgers for Louisville, but I'm afraid we're stuck with those two albatrosses. In fact, I'd be most happy if we just dumped those two and went back to the 12 we had after we added the Cornhuskers.

WestQuad

February 2nd, 2016 at 8:18 AM ^

While I appreciate the thought put into this, football is about my dad can beat up your dad.  Conferences used to represent regions.  Now they are money grubbing TV networks.  Nothing matters anymore. Get off my lawn.

WhoopinStick

February 2nd, 2016 at 8:23 AM ^

I don't see this type of schedule happening anytime soon.  Athletic depratments like to sell tickets and fill their stadium.  Having a game at the end of the season that, prior to the start of the season, you don't know who or when you're playing would be a disaster.   The first place vs first place games would be well attended, but almost all of the other games would have very empty stadiums.  If a team finished 4th in their division and is playing another 4th place team, and it's the end of November in the midwest, sorry but your not going to draw a big crowd.  With your set up you couldn't sell this game as part of the season tickets because you will never know if its a home or away game that far in advance.  

You would be much better off setting up two ten team divsions.  You play everyone in your division and then the two champions play each other.   Its not as entertaining as your set up, but you would have at lot more butts in the seats for that last game.

 

 

 

Rafiki

February 2nd, 2016 at 9:29 AM ^

Crazy thought. Given who UMs new AD is would UCONN be a possibility? Its not a geographic fit but from a basketball perspective they would be great and they would be looking to move to a bigger conference. 

blockm97

February 2nd, 2016 at 12:26 PM ^

Three thoughts..

1.  I don't think the ACC is going to be in play for B10 expansion.  We caught the perfect storm with adding Maryland.  UVA and UNC are not selling their identity regardless of TV revenue.  I believe we are left with what is left of the B12.  

2.   I also think hoops is irrelevant in these decisions.  It's largely a regional sport that does not generate enough revenue to warrant conference admission on its own.  UCONN or Kansas would need to offer significantly more than hoops to get into the B10.

3.  I don't want Texas.  They are like dating a hot, dumb chick.  It looks great on the surface but behind the curtain it is a nightmare.  Way too high maintenance for my taste.  I think everyone in the B10 would end up hating them quickly.  I also don't think the TX fanbase wants the B10 which only exasperates the above scenario.

In short, I am open to smart, calucated expansion.  But I just don't see a good available fit out there.