Six Foot Six And Rising Comment Count

Brian

2/26/2014 – Michigan 77, Purdue 76 (OT) – 20-7, 12-3 Big Ten

Michigan-77-Purdue-76-30_thumb[1]

Dustin Johnston/UMHoops 

If you're wondering where I was last night on twitter, I was studiously avoiding it because I was in Auburn Hills watching Lydia Loveless refuse to stop playing music when the rest of you were watching Michigan play Purdue. Lydia Loveless is a machine built to play country music some people are now describing as "cowpunk."

There was no encore, just the increasing irritation of her band as the set went on and on and on. She gave them a break to play a couple songs by herself, and then eventually it became clear the show was over about three songs after she had clarified they had time for just one more. Then after the end of the set she asked the guy behind the bar if being out of time meant they had to stop. To his immense credit, the guy made a combo shrug/thumbs-up motion. Lydia Loveless donned a jacket and drafted her pedal steel guitar bandmate to cover

These were all transformatively great. It was insane, worrying—I asked the MGoWife if someone would have to tackle Lydia Loveless off the stage for the show to end—and ultimately awesome.

So I watched the Purdue game despite not watching the Purdue game, and then I watched it again. The second time only moved the swearing from the entertainment to the viewer, and concluded more strangely.

--------------------------

It did not start strangely. It started like it always starts, with Michigan falling in a well. They have something like a 98% chance to hang a banner at the end of the year and they have ended up in double-digit first half holes in five games running. This has to be some sort of record. Someone sic a sports bureau on the combination of conference championships and consecutive games with double-digit deficits.

I'll be over here deciding not to throw a glass of whiskey either at the cat, or the TV, or going outside and throwing it as far as I can manage in the hopes it will turn into a CERTIFICATE OF MENTAL TOUGHNESS that will self-replicate 12 times and flit away into the hands of the Michigan basketball team. Perhaps then, assured that their grit and determination in the face of adversity has been demonstrated to the point of official, gilt recognition, they will f---ing stop it.

I don't know about you, but when the basketball team you are hoping wins gets down that much, the ensuing trudge back (if there is one) is an exercise in irrational hatred of everything. The OSU and MSU games were fine, as ten-point hole was ephemeral. Michigan quickly achieved near-parity and went from there. This one was an extended exercise in rolling around with a straight jacket on. I don't need them to play better or win more. I just need the points to be more evenly distributed across the 40 minutes of play. (I need them to play better and win more. More, always more.)

But hey, they won. On the backs of Glenn Robinson, Jordan Morgan, and Spike Albrecht, just like everyone expected.

------------------

Robinson in particular played a complete game the likes of which he has not put together in a long time: 17 points on 13 shot equivalents, eight rebounds, three assists, and one turnover. He generated a good number of his shots himself, against a defense that was amped up and aggressive on the perimeter.

I've made no secret of my frustration at Robinson's game this year. He hasn't seemed to add anything; meanwhile LeVert and Stauskas are entirely different players. His rebound rates are pedestrian at best. (He's currently tied with Derrick Walton in DREB rate.) I am still suspicious of his awareness on defense—his dude, Rapheal Davis, had five offensive rebounds one game after multiple MSU baskets were directly attributable to Robinson not getting back in transition.

And then sometimes, Lottery GRIII appears. Sometimes he elevates for a jumper that cannot be contested because getting your hand in his face would require cutting it off and throwing it at him. Sometimes there's a lob in the direction of the basket and he continues ascending after he makes the catch. Sometimes, though. Just sometimes.

At Michigan's time of need they knew Purdue would overplay Stauskas and that they should try to hit something over the top, because they needed one measly point and they had 2.9 seconds to get it. They drew up a lob pass with Spike screening GRIII's guy, and executed—barely.

The pass was a rainbow that managed to get over an outstretched hand but took its target a step too far outside, a step too far towards the baseline. Robinson took a power dribble as he landed from the catch to reset his feet; he did not gain the requisite distance as Spike's defender came in to harass him. It looked grim.

But there are people who can make a One Direction song sound poignant, and there are people who can catch alley-oops and hang there, untethered. Some people can leap from behind the backboard outside the paint and still be in the air five feet later, just where they need to be as the clock strikes zero.

image

Dustin Johnston/UMHoops

Bullets

Gotta shore up that free throw defense. If you screamed "MISS ONE FOR CHRIST'S SAKE" sometime in the second half with a Boiler at the line, you are not alone. The worst FT shooting team in the Big Ten hit 17 straight to open before the final, fateful miss; Michigan was a couple of shots behind their season average at 17/25. When all was said and done that was the difference between an extremely annoying but eventually comfortable win and TERROR IN CENTRAL INDIANA.

That business is just luck, pure and simple. At one point Stephen Bardo chalked it up to Purdue's "focus." Stephen Bardo could show up at a casino and praise the little old lady at the slots for her mental toughness when she hits a jackpot.

The hand of fate. A lot of these early holes seem like a series of completely random misses and makes. Michigan fell down against MSU early because Denzel Valentine hit a 30-footer and a running transition 3 while Michigan's generally excellent three point shooting put up a bunch of bricks; here Purdue gave up a half-dozen quality looks from three early and Michigan started 1/7 behind the line.

Meanwhile, Terone "Ann Arbor's All-American" Johnson hits his first four. Purdue isn't quite the crew of bricklayers they were last year but they're still 9th in conference at making threes and 11th at taking them, and at one point Michigan was 1/7 from three while Purdue was 5/10. Things returned to normal for the Boilers by the end; Michigan, not so much.

A very distributed night. If it was hard to pick out anything in particular anyone was doing right, that's because Michigan spread everything out. Six players grabbed offensive rebounds; five had at least three assists; six guys had at least eight points. Robinson and Morgan were your best players in terms of efficiency, but everyone was setting up everyone for shots so it was a team effort to get to 1.12 PPP despite shooting 6/23 from three.

Call it, for pant's sake. Heard today from someone who talked to a MAC assistant. Refereeing came up and he said that refs have a really tough job because they do all kinds of games for all kinds of conferences and they're told to call games differently based on what conference they're in. It will not surprise you that the Big Ten tells people to let things go way more than others.

This is cold comfort to Nik Stauskas today, I'm assuming. By the end of the game he was plunging into the lane and missing layups badly because he wasn't getting hammered on them. The standard of refereeing shifted dramatically from Sunday, when Bill Raftery deployed "nickel-dimer" a half dozen times in the first half, to Wednesday, when you had to ride over a guy's foot with a lawnmower to get a call. Unless it's Jordan Morgan, who will be told to stop bleeding all over the court and get up.

Just one of those nights. I had almost no problem with the shot selection aside from a couple of possessions where LeVert dribbled around for 15 seconds and hoisted one; Robinson also had a couple of nononoYES long twos. The 23 attempts from behind the arc were almost entirely great looks, because Purdue gives up great looks from three quite a bit. They're dead last in conference by some distance at permitting three point looks. 

The crappy shooting got in Michigan's head. There was one transition opportunity on which Caris passed up an open corner three from the run-away-I-know-it's-good spot, whereupon Michigan turned the ball over. I exclaimed "SHOOT THE BALL"; the TV informed me that John Beilein had just exclaimed "SHOOT THE BALL" and I felt better.

image

Dustin Johnston/UMHoops

Spike! Kept Walton stapled to the bench despite the terrifying prospect of a Spike-vs-pick-a-Johnson defensive matchup, and it paid off. He grabbed a rare two-point bucket, stole the ball twice, set up Morgan for two of his OT flushes, and had one bad ass alley-oop to Robinson.

Walton didn't do much other than shoot some threes against the persnickety perimeter defense of the Johnsons; Spike was better able to find shots for his teammates. "Luxury" doesn't begin to cover Albrecht's status on the roster.

Chances. Per Kenpom odds, Michigan has an 83% shot at an outright title and is 98%(!) for a share.

Comments

B-Nut-GoBlue

February 27th, 2014 at 2:43 PM ^

Stauskas got fouled a couple times but that's it.  A lot of the no-calls were good ones and the shove he got on a Purdue guy near the end of the game was pretty iffy as well (though Michigan, Spike specifically, got the ball anyway, it should have been a no-call).  He kept driving and anticipating contact, the contact that draws a foul, but it wasn't there most of the time.  That's on him and he just needs to finish, not bitch and moan that a little bump didn't get called and was the reason he missed a lay-up type shot.

freejs

February 27th, 2014 at 4:48 PM ^

And yet, one of his I can't believe he just missed that layup misses, well, if you watched a replay, the guy put a hand on his back and shoved him under the basket. 

I agree he's got to look to finish first, ask for the foul second, but sometimes a foul is a foul. The shove in the back not being called is a particular pet peeve of mine. 

B-Nut-GoBlue

February 27th, 2014 at 6:19 PM ^

I think I know the one you speak of and yes, how that gets missed I've no clue.  I really didn't mean to rip on Stauskas as much as it may have seemed but there were a few frustrating plays where he needs to just play ball and not worry about "getting calls".  The aforementioned play/no-call, not one of them..Call the damn foul!

freejs

February 27th, 2014 at 6:33 PM ^

I think it was first half, because I'm still in the first half of the rewatch. 

Yeah, it was egregious. Any of us who have been pushed in the middle of a layup attempt recall that it can turn the most coordinated person into a flailing mess. It's just so unnatural to be pushed in the middle of that motion. 

RoxyMtnHiM

February 27th, 2014 at 2:44 PM ^

Jason and the Scorchers were cowpunk. Nobody else has ever been cowpunk, or ever will.

Falling in a well to start conference games is a tradition ever since last season.

TwoFiveAD

February 27th, 2014 at 2:45 PM ^

I've been saying this for years now as good as a coach JB is his last second plays, whether it be to end the half or the game, are atrocious.  

Last year it was nothing but Trey Burke for a long contested three.  

Last night it was Stauskas for a long contested three at the end of regulation.  Then at the end of OT I'm not sure wtf that was.

Space Coyote

February 27th, 2014 at 2:56 PM ^

First, if the game is tied, teams don't tend to draw up plays that may result in a turnover and quick score the other way. That causes teams to be a bit more passive and doesn't allow for as much drive and kick. Last year, Michigan best play was high pick and roll with Burke on the ball.

Now, for this past game. The play at the end of regulation was intended to be a dribble handoff, high screen by Morgan and curl for Nik to get a mid-range shot or dip back behind Morgan for an open three if the defense switched or sank. That gave Nik two options, both with looks that he was comfortable with, without risking a turnover and run out. The play got disrupted on the dribble handoff and forced Nik to bubble out, thus resulting in a very high screen from Morgan and long shot. The Purdue defender did a good job getting his hand in GRIII's dribble hand off.

On the last play, the idea was that the defense was anticipating either a Nik curl off the Morgan screen or a give and go to LeVert. Purdue defended that pretty tightly high, leaving two smaller defenders down low on GRIII. They decoyed those things, and GRIII was intended to get an alley-oop on the front side, but Spike missed his screen and it forced LeVert to lob it cross court. If Spike sets his screen properly, it's GRIII going over a much shorter Johnson for an open dunk.

That's not complex thinking, all I have as far as basketball is high school ball. Those plays were pretty decently drawn up plays that gave Michigan chances to get looks the players were comfortable with.

TwoFiveAD

February 27th, 2014 at 3:08 PM ^

That play never had a Michigan player within 25 feet of the basket...  In a tie ball game, you attack the rim.  When the other team has deployed a 6ft 6in center because their 7 footer is out, you attack the basket.  You especially attack the basket when it's tied and you only need 1pt to win.

Everything worked out, so it's hard to complain about much.  Luck was finally on our side. 

If we lose that game in OT, that last play in regulation, JB's timeout with 2.9 seconds left and the play that won it would be criticized to no end.

But again we won, so props to JB.

JonSnow54

February 27th, 2014 at 3:37 PM ^

Another thing to think about: the team was in the double bonus! You don't want to be settling for 30 footers when you're in the double bonus.

However, I'm sure that's not the play Belein drew up, it seems like Purdue disrupted the action pretty nicely and M was out of timeouts.

B-Nut-GoBlue

February 27th, 2014 at 6:26 PM ^

I agree with the notion of attacking the basket.  I just watched LSU-Kentucky, last weekend I think(?), tied at the end of regulation with a few seconds to go and LSU has their star player just jack something up from 24-26 feet away.  No effort at all to get to the hoop.  Thist type of shit isn't the minorty, it happens all of the time and is frustrating to watch.  It's become acceptable and I'm not even sure why.  I agree with SC above about drawing stuff up that has a low chance of turing the ball over, tie games especially.  However, it seems all anybody wants anymore are hero-ball type shots from 30 feet away when getting to the basket or getting higher percentage shots (10-12 footers) have a higher chances of going in and actually making the dude a hero (especailly when 2 goddamn points will suffice!).

Uncle Rico

February 28th, 2014 at 9:17 AM ^

there's plenty of room for criticizing our inbounds play across the board. it's related to our general lack of toughness IMO. how many times have we needed TOs to get the ball inbound? We dont set picks well, and sometimes we dint even try. In summary, I think the play is designed well, but JB and staff need to work a lot on execution.

Year of Revenge II

February 28th, 2014 at 6:36 AM ^

I actually think this is your sport.  ;-) Just joking, man.

But I do think this post hits the nail on the head, high school ceiling or not.

As far as some of those football opinions after the PSU game...well...let's not go there.  I think things are looking a tad brighter for offensive line improvement though we are so young there is going to be a lot of developing to do by the staff, and a lot of development needs to be made by some individual players who are relative newbies.

Run game may look a little better (couldn't get much worse), but hoops team going to need some luck fall their way, as all the teams do, to make the Final Four again.  Beilein a heck of a coach.

Kilgore Trout

February 27th, 2014 at 3:01 PM ^

It may just be confirmation bias since I started thinking this, but it does seem to be the case. Ira actually insiuated that Beilein intentionally waited to call the TO with 3 seconds left so he could call the lob to Robinson. One, that is insane if true. Two, it's almost certainly not true. It looked like Beilein wanted UM to run it down without a TO, but Lavert was badly floundering, so he called time out.

DY

February 27th, 2014 at 4:30 PM ^

It often seems to me that M also struggles to inbound the ball on many occassions. They frequently end up having to chuck the ball into the backcourt because no one is open on the motion they run. I was really worried Caris was going to get a 5-second call on the last play because he didn't have a timeout to bail him out.

EQ RC Blue

February 27th, 2014 at 5:10 PM ^

Beilein is considered a master of late-game/out-of-time plays.  ESPN's Fraschilla tweeted last night about JB being a maestro after the play for GRIII.  Dakich has praised this about JB too.  And the stats suggest that JB and Michigan have been the best in the B1G the past couple of years in out-of-timeout situations.

http://www.umhoops.com/2014/02/10/big-ten-power-rankings-february-10th-2014/

http://www.umhoops.com/2013/03/08/behind-the-numbers-blobs-slobs-and-time-outs/

MMB 82

February 27th, 2014 at 2:48 PM ^

I had absolutely no idea who she was and had never heard of her until you mentioned her. I have never, ever liked country music until I clicked on that link. Wikipedia says she is from C-bus, but also says she has a sister named "Jessica Wabbit?"

alum96

February 27th, 2014 at 2:57 PM ^

I love the heart of this team but the rebounding, esp on the defensive end, is quite poor.  I know the rebounding totals ended up nearly equal but Purdue's manchild fouled out with a few left in regulation and was out the entire OT.  I said to myself, well we are going to now outrebound them badly in OT so even if we miss we should win comfortably since they wont get second chances.  I was wrong as their 6'4+-6'6" players got 2nd and 3rd chances for them, somehow outjumping Morgan and whoeever else was inside for us at the time.  

If we had lost this would have been a point some harp on and since we won no one mentions it but sometimes it feels like our big guys either are not well positioned or simply are not that athletic to "hop" like some other players. 

Not to question Beilein because he has my utmost confidence but I wonder what a 6'10 defensive specialist center who does nothing but "Dennis Rodman" would do in this type of program.  That role was not necessarily needed with McGary coming back but if he had left for the NBA it would be nice to have a development center out there redshirting right now who has limited offensive skills (since the center on this specific team is usually going to be 4th option at best) but made other teams fear going inside and then snatched rebounds like a madman.  He could get 5-8 pts a nite just grabbing garbage time shots and stuffing them back in.  I dont see anyone like that either on the roster (outside Mitch) or in the recruiting files, and I realize Coach B wants skill at every position but again, a guy with limited skill set who jumps out of the gym and gets so many of these defensive rebounds that seem to fall to other teams would create a lot less heart strain :)  He also would not be hard to recruit - he would probably be ranked 100-150 nationally since he would be limited offensively. 

champswest

February 27th, 2014 at 2:51 PM ^

girlie cowpunk singers when the Wolverines are playing.

And don't tell us how upset you were while watching a replay of a game that you already knew ended in a win.  The rest of us had to suffer through it in real time.

jmblue

February 27th, 2014 at 3:58 PM ^

Stat I read somewhere: Beilein is 14-3 in Big Ten overtime games.  If true that's pretty amazing - in games in which the two teams are dead even for 40 minutes, his team ends up on top almost 80% of the time.  Close games are not a coinflip with this staff.

 

skurnie

February 27th, 2014 at 3:26 PM ^

My Dad's cable is maybe 5-10 seconds faster than mine. He ruined the ending again last night while we were on the phone. He does this at least a few times per season. Here's how it goes during the TO:

Dad: So what are they going to do?

Skurnie: Get it to Stauskas or LeVert, I'd guess

Dad: Yep

...I'm still seeing them break huddle

Dad: OHHHHHH Long Pass

...lining up for the play

Dad: IT'S IN IT'S IN...IT'S GOOD!

...sees throw in to GRIII and bucket.

Skurnie: Dad, YOU'RE AHEAD OF ME. KNOCK IT OFF. YOU DID IT AGAIN.

Dad: WHO CARES WE WON

The FannMan

February 27th, 2014 at 3:30 PM ^

Did anyone else think of ice dancing when they saw the last picture in the post?  Doesn't it look like the guy from Purdue is about to lift Spike off the ice and perform a spinning something or other?

 

Needs

February 27th, 2014 at 3:47 PM ^

Quietly, Irvin had a vital role in the run that closed the gap in the second half with a quick 5 points (3 and 2/3 foul shots). If nothing else, he's a great option to further space the floor.

I would like to know what the thinking was in putting Irvin on Ronnie Johnson during Purdue's last offensive possession in OT. I guess it was to try to defend him with height since Spike couldn't stay in front of him at all, but it was not surprising that Johnson crossed Irvin over almost immediately and got fouled. I would think Caris would be well suited if that was the intent, rather than Irvin, who doesn't strike me as someone particularly suited to defending Johnson's quickness. At any rate, it was an interesting approach that didn't really work. 

Steves_Wolverines

February 27th, 2014 at 4:49 PM ^

A lot of fans from teams who hate Michigan are claiming that:

1) GR3's foot hit the ground before he got the final shot off.

2) Morgan touched the net while the ball was on the rim, which should have negated the basket.

3) The officiating was so one sided towards Michigan, that Purdue should have won by 10+ if not for the poor officiating.

 

Guess we can't really celebrate this "win", if you can even call it that...

freejs

February 27th, 2014 at 6:39 PM ^

Utterly bogus. 

I am actually offended by the morons complaining about things like Hammons' 5th foul. That's just basketball stupid to act like that's not going to be a foul. 

Morgan totally touched the net, but that's never going to be called on a buzzer beater. Like, exactly never. 

And the poster who made the point that we got away with some contact under our basket on defense isn't wrong, but the posters who said the whole game was just rough are exactly right. Nik had scrapes all over his arms by the end of the game, and there was so much shoving on the offensive glass and fouls on the driver by Purdue that I don't see how there can be any complaints. The officials basically rolled the ball out and said anything goes. 

freejs

February 27th, 2014 at 6:41 PM ^

I'm watching this game again, and I can't even imagine what the AJ Hammons experience must be like for a coach. 

That kid is so absurdly talented. 

He's going to drive multiple NBA coaches crazy someday. 

Low Key Recidivist

February 27th, 2014 at 9:13 PM ^

I've felt like getting violent; doing a Dawson was out of the question as I did that as a teenager and learned my lesson; wasting whiskey is not in my firmware or mircocode; cat abuse is verbotten.  But swear I did and the spouse and daughter were thoroughly  and appropriately appalled.

Brian, kudos for the Lydia Loveless reference; listened to some of her stuff and it's damn good.  Ive always been a big Steve Earle fan so no surprise.   

Year of Revenge II

February 28th, 2014 at 6:14 AM ^

Brian:

C'mon man.  You really believe the refs are told to call the games differently depending upon what conference they are in?  And because that is what some unnamed MAC assistant coach said?

The refs do have a hard job, buts it's because the athletes are fast, strong, and in many cases decent actors. On the other hand, the Big Ten always comes up short in this category because its referees are...well..shitty, compared to other conferences.  It hurts them in the tournament because fouls are fouls, not because the game is called differently.

A great example of the amazing lack of talent of the average Big Ten ref was the charges the UM players were taking on MSU, and they were still getting called for blocking.  On one of them, the defender was set for a good 2-second count.  A monkey could have made that call correctly, but noooooo...., not in the Big Ten, where the referee assignments must be made with much more political grease than other conferences because Big Ten refs historically, and this year is no different, cannot ref their way out of a wet paper bag.

So loved the article Brian, writing was great as usual.  Cannot understand why you no like the Eagles though.  One of my favorites, but to each his own.

But seriously, some MAC assistant is some MAC assistant for a reason, he obviously has no clue.  Don't fall for it.  Dude is an idiot.  Wait til the tourney when fouls again will be fouls cause the refs are actually watching the game and blowing the whistle when they see fouls.  Wisconsin will fall earlier than you expect them to.

Refs will still miss some calls.  It is tough job.  But whoever is in charge of Big Ten basketball reffing should be ashamed of himself.

That is all.