OT - Best game system for kids
I did a quick search and it looked like the last time this was discussed was a few years ago, but apologies if this is a repeat of a recent topic.
I am planning to get my 8-year old son his first game system and wanted to see if there was a consensus on the board as to which of the current options is best. The last system I owned was ColecoVision in the 80's, so I have no relevant first-hand experience on the topic.
In addition to games played while sitting, he says he also likes playing the games where you're more active (Wii, Kinnect, I believe).
I understand there is an online component to gaming, but at his current age, we're going to try to keep that under wraps for a while and keep all interaction inside our home.
My hope is this is a system that will last him a few years.
Any new systems on the horizon that are worth waiting for?
Thanks for the help.
Best gaming system for kids there ever was. See also: neighborhood friends and bikes.
I grew up in the 60s and was gone from breakfast to streetlights, many nights my dad had to track me down. It's just not safe today to let your kids run around their own neighborhood. Sad times.
Exactly. The gap between the dangers people perceive today and the actual level of danger is so vast, it never ceases to amaze me. OK, it's probably more dangerous today than in 1820, but only because everyone lived 40 miles apart. But comparing today to the 40s, 50s, 60s, or 70s? Forget about it, it's way safer today...
To go one step further, we are statistically living in the safest time ever. People are idiots and post shit on facebook and everyone scares everyone else and becoems paranoid. But crime is at its lowest in American history.
Safety isn't just about crime. I am very protective of my 7 and 4 year old daughters. I worry more about what they'll get exposed to because of access to technology (or their peers' access) than I do an actual physical crime being committed against them. Their brains aren't prepared to process all the ideas and images that are waiting to leap into their eyes and ears. You can think I'm an idiot if you want, but I'd rather err on the side of caution.
Ataribox coming soon
If you want to fund it.
Atari is going with a crowd funding effort. I guess investors don't believe enough in Atari to invest.
I'm also guessing the public won't believe in Atari enough to hand over their cash either.
I think the easy snap answer is because of your kid's age, the Switch.
If you are looking to play a lot and get a ton of value yourself, PS4 has the best stuff out there right now and it's not really close. PS4/PC. The XBOX is a doorstop.
No matter what system you get now, you'll definitely get good time out of them.
I didn't even know this system existed. Looks pretty good - thanks for the info.
But Nintendo is very erratic about system development. They do not value hardware at all.
Switch will be around for a bit, and can do very well as long as Nintendo continues to support it.
They value hardware, just in other ways. They care about having something different and innovative compared to Sony and Microsoft, who simply try to build the best super console with lots of computing power and more than gaming functionality. They are multimedia platforms now, which is what Nintendo does not care about being. That's fine and all, but they will never be able to be as big as Xbox and PS. They clearly don't care about that and will accept being in third place. Again, there is nothing wrong with that. They're still making money. I wish they would just fold as far as consoles go and become a third party game developer instead.
Big problem. They aren't willing to try and match those companies. I have often thought about how awesome it would be to play Mario or whatever other exclusive Nintendo has on great hardware. And that is why they are lagging way behind MS/Sony.
The majority of today's gamers want power. That's just the fact. They want the highest level graphics and the best looking stuff. We are pushing more and more towards 4k and beyond. Gimmicky hardware does not have much of a home in 2017.
This depends on your defiinition of "gamer" though. Some would argue that today's gamer mostly wants a cheap or free mobile game to play on their phone, not power.
Outside of the overall discussion with the big 3 companies. Sure, everyone likes free and mobile stuff on their phone, that's a given.
Nintendo is trying to cater to that in a way, but their general gameplan of implementation is crap. That's why the NES Classic failed so massively. They had NO IDEA how big of a demand that system would be, and could not come close to matching the overall want.
Personally, my overall thought about Nintendo is that they got really fat and sassy during the early years of console gaming, and assumed their name would continue to generate popularity. The other systems provided an eye-popping experience, and they haven't let up.
They also made the poor choice to not make that mini thing expandable. It'd be sweet to be able to add games to it, whether they be free or require a purchase.
Almost for fun to see if it would work, and they were not ready for what happened. That's a big time rookie mistake from a company that has been around for decades.
They could have done a lot with that system.
I don't know if they got all fat and sassy, well they did but I dont think that was the problem. They made back to back terrible choices that they took a beating on and they decided not to try and compete anymore. They stuck with cartridge for N64 when sony went with cd's, then they used those stupid mini disks on the gamecube which was a more powerful system than the ps2, but those gimmicky mini disks could not hold as much data as regular cd's and it killed them again. The wii selling so much sucked because now they think gimmicks are the way to go..if they would just put out a normal competative console I think they would stomp Sony and Microsoft.
I think plenty of people just want to play their exclusives on high-end systems.
I would love to play Mario, Mario Kart, whatever unique Nintendo games on something like a GTX 1070 (my card). It would be freaking awesome.
Nintendo continues to hamstring themselves with hardware. Gimmicks only get you so far.
I'm just not convinced that Nintendo belongs lumped in with Sony and Microsoft for console gaming anymore. This is obviously to a different degree of difference, but you wouldn't say "I would love to play Angry Birds and Candy Crush on something like a GTX 1070!" I think there are millions of people who agree with you; and I'd be one of them if I didn't prefer my "powerful" gaming on a PC instead of a console, but to me Nintendo has a different target/intention.
Comparison. Angry Birds and Candy Crush cannot be compared to the Zeldas and Marios of the world. Two completely different things.
With a bullet point is because the Wii IS a gimmick. It was something completely new that the market had not seen prior. Now that it has come and gone, it is much harder to sell another new gimmick to the general public.
Hardware is, and always will be the biggest selling point for a large market of gamers that play modern-day consoles. Nintendo always has to play catch-up because they can't match specification power.
Yep, fact is, game revenues are growing fastest right now on mobile platforms. More people spending $$ on 'freemium' games and such than consoles or PCs at the moment.
I agree with everything you said. Nintendo has always tried to be different than the competition. They have also had gimmicky stuff since the 80s (see the Power Glove, Power Pad, and Edge joystick), so that is nothing new for them. When other companies went to discs, Nintendo stuck with cartridges. Then when they finally made the choice to go to discs, they were small. Now, it worked out in the end, as the N64 and Gamecube were and still are hugely popular (at least with people my age (35) and older, but they love doing their own thing.
I am what you described, though. I like pretty graphics, normal controllers (weird, though, because I still consider the Gamecube the best controller, but after that, it's Xbox One), and a better game selection. I can't get Battlefield, Halo, and several other games on Nintendo. As I stated below, though, I do want a Switch. I was all about Nintendo until I got my hands on an Xbox 360. I've been Xbox all the way ever since.
Come on now the Gamecube was never hugely popular. That system was such a flop that everyone and their mother were trying to sell the system after purchase. By the time they released the Gamecube Nintendo already had a huge following and they still couldn't hold off the unknown Xbox.
I think Gamecube was the start of Nintendo focusing more on stuff for kids as adults looking for serious games had multiple better options. From my memory (Im 31) essentially everyone I knew with a Gamecube were younger cousins or friends younger brothers. When GC came out we kind of rolled our eyes at it like when Sega tried to get back into the market with Dreamcast.
Perhaps I remember things differently, then. I was always under the impression that the Cube is awesome. I love it.
I was never a fan of the Cube; I was more of a Playstation guy myself. However, nothing frustrated me more as a child then when I would go to a friend's house to play Super Smash Bros. on his 64. It would take me a while to master the controller, and then once I started to win, we would switch over to the Cube's version, with a totally new controller. Madness.
Nintendo sold 22 million Gamecubes, which was nearly on par with Xbox at the time, although well behind PS2.
I thought you were referring to the type of switch Adrian Peterson is more familiar with. Hadn't heard of the Nintendo kind, that's an important distinction.
Not sure why you got negged for that, must be a Xbox/PS4 fanboy in the MGoBlog ranks.
Nintendo Switches are selling very well right now, although there isn't a huge catalog of games right now, but that is slowly changing.
None of them... get your kids outside in the fresh air and away from the TV and their computers/phones.
Now get off my lawn...
But I also have to be realistic. We live in Chicago (a lot of crappy weather) and in the city on a fairly busy street (outdoor play requires us to at least keep an eye on him). My kid has a lot of playdates with his friends and they are increasingly becoming video game centric. If we want our house to be a place where kids want to hang out, I think this is a necessary evil.
I have three kids of my own and did, reluctantly, go through the video games phase - fortunately my kids never got obsessed with them (computers, Netflix and cell phones are now a different story).
Best of luck with your gaming of choice... go blue