When you run out of reasons, it's you. [Patrick Barron]

This Week's Obsession: Moving On? Comment Count

Seth November 10th, 2020 at 9:09 AM

It's time to talk Jim Harbaugh job security.

Seth: If my opinion changed based on the result of one game is that a good opinion?

Ace: Nearly six years of games seems like enough. There’s always a tipping point.

Brian: I think the last two games are both so far below expectations and yet still part and parcel of what the Harbaugh era has been that they change things. Like: MSU lost to Rutgers and then got annihilated by Iowa. And Indiana just beat Michigan by three scores.

Ace: The last two games also reflected problems we’ve been discussing for years and saw coming before the season started.

Seth: MSU is a worse team but the IU loss feels much worse. I remember enough of Bo to at least know what's up when Michigan sleepwalks against a terrible opponent. Two weeks in a row of not knowing what your opponent is good at is incomprehensible.

Ace: We obviously didn’t expect… this… but we knew cornerback and defense tackle were problem spots.

Seth: Fuegobox hot take: defensive tackle has been fine?

Brian: Yeah there's a big difference between "the corners are meh Big Ten players" and what we've actually got.

Alex: My opinion changed because of one game, but it wasn’t the Indiana game. Michigan State is HORRIBLE and Michigan was at home, huge favorites... that’s the type of game you cannot be losing in Year Six.

Ace: Iowa scored 49 on them. Ricky White caught 1 of 8 targets against the Hawkeyes.

Alex: You got your Ricky White comment out before me lol.

Seth:

Alex: Indiana might actually be quite good, but the point remains. Harbaugh’s failed here. It sucks to put it that way, but it’s true.

Ace: Our scouting. This staff’s… hit or miss.

[After THE JUMP: Are you Fritz Crisler enough?]

---------------------------------------------------

Alex: One legit question is how much we are willing to give Jim a pass because this year was ruined by covid. Granted, that’s something every team is dealing with, but do we really want a transition in the next few months?

Seth: The thing about college sports is you can't fire the cornerback. You have to go back three years when they were recruiting these cornerbacks and see who's still around and what part of cornerback recruiting wasn't fixed.

Ace: The specifics don’t even feel worth going over because it’s the stuff we’ve been discussing for years. There’s just a point when you know it’s over. It’s over.

Seth: I mean we're making decisions for 2023 right now. The events of 2020-'22 are mostly set.

Brian: I don't think COVID has anything to do with jumping offsides six times in a half. All these teams are working under the same situation except Michigan didn't have to pause practice. How many consecutive years are we going to have to wonder why the offense makes no sense?

Ace: Particularly when there’s been a lot of changing on that side of the ball with one constant: Jim Harbaugh.

Alex: No, covid isn’t the reason why they look so poorly coached. It is why Ambry and Nico are gone — though who knows how big of a difference either would make. I guess I’m wondering whether making a move with this level of uncertainty would make the transition more difficult. Only one P5 hoops head coach was fired this offseason (before Chambers got canceled for being racist, I guess).

Brian: It seems like by the time the decision is being made we'll have a pretty good read on a whole bunch of different vaccines, so there will be way less uncertainty than there was for the basketball coaching carousel.

Alex: Good point. I guess we might as well rip the band-aid sooner rather than later too. A lame duck 2021 would be real bad.

Ace: When the main argument against firing a coach is “but what comes next?” that coach probably needs to go.

Seth: I think the main argument is "Can Michigan do better?" Not Michigan as if we're in charge. Is Warde Manuel going to get an improvement on Jim Harbaugh?

Ace: I hate that argument. We know this isn’t working. It’s time to try something else because at least there’s a chance it’ll work. There are so, so many football coaches! Buckets of them!

Alex: If we can’t get someone who won’t trip over their own dick against the worst State team I have seen in my life... might as well beef up the hoops budget.

Ace: Some of them didn’t even go to Michigan! In all seriousness, Manuel has the benefit of knowing this is a possibility early in the coaching change cycle. They should be kicking the tires on viable candidates to get an idea of what the market will look like before any move is made.

Brian: The pickings do seem a little slim.

Ace: There isn’t a strikingly obvious candidate like last time but strikingly obvious candidates, as we’ve learned, have sometimes peaked. I’d love to see them take a shot at Mario Cristobal, for example, but there are also always guys at smaller schools and if you find the right one on the way up that’s where home runs are often hit.

We don’t know if Chris Creighton can recruit but we also don’t know if he can’t and he’s done an incredible job in a horrible spot at Eastern. And I’m guessing Michigan can come up with several candidates people would like better.

Seth: If you're going to find one who can get Michigan to regularly competing for playoffs level you need an elite, and they don't come around often. When they do they shoot multiple small schools into national conversations.

Brian: I'm not arguing against a move. I am wondering if the lack of an obvious guy might tilt the scales towards a return we don't want.

Ace: Dabo Swinney was not an obvious guy.

Seth: Dabo's been the Harbaugh comp up until recently because Clemson was Clemsoning for half a decade before they hit.

Alex: Step 1: promote WR coach. Step 2: give up 70 in a bowl game. Step 3: win multiple national titles.

Ace: Seth, Dabo won 10, 11, 11, and 10 games in years 4-7. And that’s if you include his interim year as a full one. Otherwise that’s years 3-6. They went to the title game the next two years. There’s no comparison there.

What I’m saying is that it’s worse to wait when the only thing holding you back is not being sure of the next guy. You can always fire the next guy.

Seth: You don't fear becoming Nebraska?

Ace: Buddy, I’ve got news, we are Nebraska. I’d like to be better. Operating out of a paralyzing fear of losing the program’s inherent Michigan Greatness or whatever is exactly why it fell off.

Brian: This is going to be the first real decision Warde has to make. Bringing back that tweet from the game column:

If that's true and he doesn't pull the trigger you're looking at a cosmetic extension and the hope that returning almost everyone allows you to have the traditional Year Seven leap. Two things about this:

  1. Mel had left to coach Michigan Tech, got them their first two tourney bids in 30 years, and Michigan fell off the instant he left.
  2. When Beilein left the coaching carousel was already basically done so the Nate Oats types were already at new jobs. Juwan Howard was one of just three guys I preferred to just hiring Yaklich, and the other two were never options.

Totally different situation in football, where presumably they'd have a healthy amount of time to search and there are literally no even sort-of viable guys with any connection to the program.

Ace: I’ve choosing to live in a reality where that tweet doesn’t exist. It’s one source and we all remember 2014. And 2007.

Brian: I don't know what the chances are that Michigan makes a move after going 2-6, 3-5 but they're lower than I'd like.

Seth: "What are you gonna, do hire Brady Hoke?" --Man stabbed with Brady Hoke

Ace: The problem wasn’t hiring a new coach, the problem was hiring one of the worst possible options. I don’t even know what else to add there. Don’t make “Michigan Man™” a prerequisite, I guess. Or let Dave Brandon run anything.

Brian: There isn't even a Hoke! Hoke had a very good year at Ball State and greatly improved SDSU in year two. That's orders of magnitude more resume than the Michigan Man candidates have this time around.

Ace: Creighton. Cristobal. Joe Brady. Eric Bienemy. I haven’t even done research yet. I’m working on the hoops preview.

Brian: What I'm trying to say is that the chances of Michigan pulling the Hoke again are negligible because there isn't even a Hoke.

Ace: Sorry it’s late.

Seth: Bienemy was recruited by Bill McCartney if we need to play Six Degrees of Michigan.

Ace: We might need more degrees.

Seth: He also ran a Mad Magicians in the Super Bowl.

Ace: It’s been pointed out to me that a way Michigan could help repair some of their issues in Ohio is to hire Matt Campbell, a Mount Union guy. Mount Union has a much better coaching tree than ours—we’ve got two on staff.

Seth: Warinner and?

Ace: Ben McDaniels. Not a grad but connected to the tree. To be clear, I’m not saying Michigan should run out and hire Matt Campbell, but I’ve also heard worse ideas.

Like Hoke.

Seth: Eric Bienemy and Matt Campbell are fine options. I can't think of any others.

Ace: That’s a lack of imagination, in my opinion.

Brian: Luke Fickell. Tom Allen. Lane Kiffin. Matt Rhule.

Ace: Pay the Venables children to transfer. Jeff Brohm.

Seth: Brohm turns down his alma mater but goes to Michigan for the money and prestige?

Brian: Wow we're just gonna let Kiffin slide by without comment?

Seth: Wow you were serious about Fickell?

Ace: Fickell would be a home run. Fire the cannon and make him think about it.

Brian: I'd say he'd be a solid bet to succeed, and that's about as good as we're going to get.

Ace: Circling back, Michigan is still a much better and more lucrative job than Louisville. Someone can step into a whole lot of money and talent.

Seth: Yeah but I don't think Purdue is and he stayed there.

Brian: (at most positions)

Ace: The difference between Louisville and Michigan as coaching jobs remains vast. It’s, again, not even a discussion.

Brian: Brohm is currently making 50% more than Louisville's coach FWIW. That BTN money came in handy.

Ace: Vast.

Seth: I just don't think the Michigan job is something everyone wants. The difference in lifestyle between $4.5 million and $7 million isn't that huge. It's a prestige job but it's also one people know comes with enormous baggage that other prestige jobs don't.

Brian: Yeah. RichRod getting torpedoed is going to make both sides of any potential deal wary. That's why we are where we are and why I'm very excited to watch some basketball and hockey over the next few years.

Ace: People said this about Alabama before Saban got there.

Seth: I was speaking specifically about Fickell, really.

Ace: No job is going to appeal to literally everyone.

Brian: Saban was desperate to get out of the NFL and already had a national title so was confident he could get the rabbling Alabama people on the same page.

Ace: It’s an example. The same thing happened with Harbaugh, Michigan just caught the wrong part of his career arc.

Brian: I mean Fickell might want something else. There is going to be a reasonable up and comer worth taking a swing on. Therefore take the swing.

Ace: Hard to hit dingers if you don’t step up to the plate.

Seth: Just take the donut rings off please. It's 2020.

Brian: I wonder who the bunt single coaching hire is

Ace: Nick Sheridan.

Brian: Bunt single is pretty all right! You got on base!

Ace: Scot Loeffler.

Brian: Not in a sustainable or reasonable way, but you're on base!

Ace: …is a strikeout looking.

Brian: On base, unsustainable, eventually doomed: Mike Leach. Mike Leach is the bunt single of coaching hires. Dabo Swinney is that home run that bounced of Jose Canseco's head.

Comments

MGoStrength

November 10th, 2020 at 11:31 AM ^

Someone mentioned this in a recent comment on another thread. We've reached the point where after all these hires and failures, it may not be the coach but the school / administration that is preventing Michigan from reaching the pinnacle. 

I agree there are some cultural pitfalls at UM, mainly due to their own historical success and their academic strengths.  This is no different than ND.  I disagree that the right candidate can't overcome those and it doesn't have to be a home run.  It just needs to be a strong, charismatic personality, or at least one that is not easy rattled.  RR has proven after leaving that he was not as good as his time at WVU indicated or he needed whatever benefit that job provided to be successful.  Hoke has also proved at various stops that he's not a capable P5 HC.  JH has also proved over time that although he does some things well, he also has some significant holes in his management/coaching style.  I'm not sure those were evident prior to coming to UM.  But, we still had questions on if he could recruit.  So, I think anyone at UM will recruit to some degree based off name recognition.

The problem is that for whatever reason it is very hard in today's day and age to find a guy that can run a good program and recruit at a top 10 level consistently.  That list is very short...Meyer, Saban, Dabo, & Smart.  That's really it.  UM is not pulling any of those.  Then fringe guys are Fisher, Mullen, Kelly, Franklin, Riley, Orgeron, Malzahn, Diaz, & Cristobal.  I'm not sure either a) if UM can pull any of those from their respective schools or b) UM fans would be happy with them.  That means you have to move on to something less proven, which is a successful coach at a smaller school, which likely didn't have the name recognition to prove he can recruit at an elite level or hire a successful coordinator that is a proven recruiter.  Both of those options have a certain level of uncertainty.  But, we know that what we currently have is not working and getting progressively worse.  We can no longer hope for 2016 or even 2018.  So, unless we're OK being a .500 or 7-6 type program, it's time to take a shot at someone with less certainty.  Chance are they won't do any worse that where JH is headed (not where he's been).

MGoStrength

November 10th, 2020 at 2:24 PM ^

If we ignore this year, which I know...but it's hard to assess due to Covid and it's not over yet.  Franklin started in 2014, so the 2014 recruiting class is not his.  But, he's basically averaging the same recruiting class as JH.  UM is averaging #12 and Franklin #14.  They both have an almost identical record of 9.5 - 3.5.  The key difference is Franklin started low and his trajectory has improved, whereas UM's started high and is trending down.  Franklin also has the better bowl record and the lone OSU victory and conference title.  And, Franklin has the more non-head scratching offense.  So, all in all I'd say Franklin seems like the better of the two, but they are not all that different.  But, I don't get the sense that PSU feels like the sky is falling with Franklin and he needs to go the way UM fans do with JH. 

I'm not saying I want Franklin either.  But, my guess is UM is a better recruiting destination and he'd see a bump if he switched schools.  So, if Franklin had several top 10 recruiting classes at UM I think he could do more like the 10-11 win type seasons he had in '16, '17, & '19 rather than the 7-6 variety he started his career with.  And, I think most UM fans would be satisfied with that so long as we're weren't getting pistol whipped by OSU.

Recruiting

2015 - #14 (UM #37)

2016 - #20 (UM #8)

2017 - #15 (UM #5)

2018 - #6 (UM #22)

2019 - #13 (UM #8)

2020 - #15 (UM #14)

Average: #13.8

 

Record

2014 - 7-6

2015 - 7-6

2016 - 11-3

2017 - 11-2

2018 - 9-4

2019 - 11-2

Average: 9.3 - 3.8

BlueTimesTwo

November 10th, 2020 at 4:03 PM ^

While I am finally ready to concede that Harbaugh may be done here, I also feel badly for how circumstances (and his opposition) conspired against him.  Coming in, he had two big things going for him:  1)  his willingness to ensure that nobody would outwork him; and 2) his fire and enthusiasm for the game (also related to #1).

Upon arriving at Michigan, first he is told that he is recruiting too hard and too effectively (satellite camps, etc.), and that it is not fair to poor Hugh Freeze and Nick Saban.  So the NCAA bans Harbaugh's tactics and tells him that he is not allowed to work harder and smarter on the recruiting front (even though it was entirely within the previously-existing rules).  So without resorting to illegal tactics (i.e. cash), his influence was limited.

Then he starts to show his usual fire on the field, and is told that is too offensive to the delicate sensibilities of the poor zebras, and the Harbaugh rule is passed.  So he is forced to choose between being fiery and hurting his team, or passive and hurting his team.  Rather than being himself, he needs to second-guess his instincts to toe the line and figure out how much of himself is permitted.

Fast forward to today, and now we have the neutered version of Harbaugh that we see today, which is exactly what the OSUs and 'Bamas of the world wanted.  So maybe we need to stop evaluating to the Platonic ideal of Harbaugh that was hired, and instead evaluate the one that we have today.  Having been told by the B1G and the NCAA that he can coach however he wants, as long as it is not done "The Harbaugh Way" he may just not have the energy to keep fighting City Hall.

DoubleB

November 10th, 2020 at 6:43 PM ^

I would define a home run hire as a coach who is successful with the current limitations in place, not a brand name hire.

And I agree I think there are a group of guys who can get Michigan back to a top 5 program even with some of these issues. There isn't a person commenting on this thread who has any idea who those guys are. It requires having someone in place who can identify coaching talent. That's a bit of a catchall, but that's what it's about.

Here's the one questions I would always ask, "is there anything in this coach's success that could be explained by outside, uncontrollable factors." As an example, RichRod coached in a weakened Big East after the departure of Miami with an offense about 3-5 years ahead of its time.

I like Fickell, but it's not like he's winning at Rutgers. Brian Kelly won big there. Butch Jones had success there (and Tuberville won a conference title with Jones guys). To Fickell's credit, he has raised the bar. 

The variance with Joe Brady is Rutgers to Ohio State and everywhere in between. He COULD be the guy, but there are just so many unknowns.

Matt Campbell is intriguing. It's hard to win at Iowa State. They've had one head coach with an above .500 record in the last 100 years--Earle Bruce. The Big XII being down has helped, but he hasn't beaten some good teams.

BuckeyeChuck

November 10th, 2020 at 12:05 PM ^

Keep in mind that it's not all about Harbaugh (or whoever might be hired as HC). You gotta have a great staff.

When Urban came to OSU, sure he got paid handsomely but he didn't agree to a deal until he knew he had a staff budget big enough to bring in the best possible assistant coaches. He had a great offensive mind like Tom Herman. Chris Ash, despite spectacularly flaming out as HC at Rutgers, came in and made major improvements to the defense. He brought in Ryan Day and Benedict Mattison. Even has a former HC in Kevin Wilson, another great offensive mind and is being paid more as OC than he would make as a HC anywhere else.

Whoever Michigan has as HC, they need to be willing to bring in the best possible staff. Without an elite staff...they simply won't reach elite status.

My Name is LEGIONS

November 10th, 2020 at 2:09 PM ^

That leads me to mention how wrong it is to play scared with Milton, and keep losing yet guaranteeing him playing....  play to win, and if McNamara ends up playing, so be it.  Everyone else seems to thrive and have their backups not lose a step, even outplay the starter...  Haskins, Chugunov, and so on...

At least RR wasn't scared like this... granted he ran Denard into the ground...

MGlobules

November 10th, 2020 at 2:42 PM ^

This ignores a point cooler heads are making: You don't get to be Alabama, Clemson, or OSU even if you have an admin hell-bent on it, and I do mean hell-bent. Those schools bend and pray their way around the rules. 

So first you have to have that come-to-Jesus moment where your community decides--hey, let's go ahead and sell our souls to El Football Diablo. Unless there's some New Great Awakening about to take place, complete with baptist immersions, on the banks of the Huron, the University of Michigan probably isn't headed there anytime soon.

Harbaugh's gotta go, true. But I still find the above conversation lazy. We need to look across the college ranks of young, bright unknowns, find that youthful genius who's seeing the next phase, and be humble enough to give him five to ten years to make Michigan a fun program. 9-3, 10-2 consistently would be fine.   

Brodie

November 10th, 2020 at 5:12 PM ^

This is correct. Michigan continues to be a program where the community and the administration views football as kind of a fun heirloom. It's what it is. It's not a statewide religion, it's not the college's raison d'etre. We are what would happen if Cal woke up tomorrow and suddenly every jilted Raiders fan was cheering for the Bears... the relationship is uncomfortable, the fans with no affiliation to the school don't have any sway and the die hard fans who are alumni are less numerical than the people who just like to see us win more than we lose (if they like football at all). 

Harbaugh has to go because there's no there there anymore, but we need to stop lying to ourselves about the ceiling of this program in 21st century college football. We are Wisconsin. We can be good, great even. Contend for the playoff. Win 11 games sometimes! But we will also lose 3 games. We're not going to be Bama, there's never going to be a Death Star built in the Big House. 

NowTameInThe603

November 10th, 2020 at 3:42 PM ^

The NIL rule that the NCAA seems to be heading towards should take care of most of the concerns of playing by the rules. Of course there will be programs will continue to play on the fringes but the Michigan brand will be extremely valuable for player’s NIL. Look at the contracts given out for uniform rights. 
 

Also Notre Dame has the religious affiliation that separates them.

My Name is LEGIONS

November 10th, 2020 at 9:31 AM ^

D'Antonio is Fickell's mentor... and D'Antonio's hate source is due to Martin having no perspective and not hiring him to beat Tressel in 2005 or 2006...    Unless Fickel wants to coach in the SEC, this will be his best opportunity.. but working against him is his mentor's pettiness and will try to prevent it... along with Cinci becoming the second formidable opponent in the state of Ohio... I don't think Fickell wants to leave this.  

It will come down to how much Old Testament vs New in him, how bad he felt spurned by OSU, because it will be this versus him continuing to build Cinci.

Njia

November 10th, 2020 at 9:41 AM ^

I get your point here, and I agree that Dantonio's preference would undoubtedly be to have Michigan twist in the wind. But ... If Luke Fickell is your friend and a historical, blue chip coaching job opened up, it takes a special kind of dick to tell him not to at least take Warde's phone call.

OTOH, Dantonio is a special kind of dick.

rice4114

November 10th, 2020 at 1:47 PM ^

If Dantonio and Fickell were thick as thieves I would figure Fickell makes his way to MSU this year. I'm not so sure. Especially when MSU plays the role of OSUlite and hires the best coach OSu doesn't want so they can come at us from both programs. The problem with Michigan is that OSU and MSU consider us their top rival.

My Name is LEGIONS

November 10th, 2020 at 2:11 PM ^

Thick as theives was Dantonio and Tressel.. Tressel funneled all their plan B players to MSU...

Dantonio is Fickell's mentor, but Fickell was smart not to follow him...  same with Belichik not following Parcells... its almost a no win situation, and especially since Harbaugh took back the state at the time.

WFNY_DP

November 10th, 2020 at 10:12 AM ^

Really, I would just want the symmetry of Fickell being the head coach of both teams the last two times UM beat OSU (assuming he would come in and be able to do that). Last time UM beat OSU? Fickell was OSU's head coach. Next time UM beats OSU? Fickell is UM's head coach. We've got newspaper people on the payroll, don't we Tom? They might like a story like that.

Denarded

November 10th, 2020 at 9:34 AM ^

Is everyone really turned off by P.J. Fleck? I know he's struggled this year, but I'll give him a pass for missing his 2 best OL and replacing 10/11 starters on defense. His offenses are always elite, he produces a 1st round NFL WR everywhere he goes and he still has a lot of his WMU recruits that turned over onto his Minnesota roster. He has taken a MAC School to a NY6 bowl, then won 11 games at Minnesota in his 3rd year. Contrary to Michigan's program, it seems his teams actually play inspired and get up for big games. I think he would be a home run hire at any blue blood program whenever he gets that call. 

MGoStrength

November 10th, 2020 at 11:36 AM ^

I like him as a recruiter.  He has lots of energy.  Certainly he can coach DBs.  Can he run/CEO a program?  IDK.  If we're going to take a shot at an OH assistant, I'd prefer Hartline...same recruiting success, same energy, but younger and more likely to improve.  I also like the idea of Hafley and think we could pull him from BC.  

andrewgr

November 10th, 2020 at 12:27 PM ^

Hafley is a home run hire.  Or at least, he's got a really good chance of being a home run hire.  He needs a few more seasons as head coach before he'd be ready to come in and get amazing results year one-- he just doesn't have HC experience, he's going to make mistakes-- but IMHO it would be worth enduring 2-3 years of some mistakes in order to get a guy that has the potential to be a 20 year career, elite head coach.

CompleteLunacy

November 10th, 2020 at 11:06 AM ^

Well 11 wins isn't something to brush off either. That's their most wins since 1904, and the least number of losses since 1967. The schedule was weak but they did knock off #4 ranked PSU at home, and beat a good #12 Auburn team in the bowl.  I don't know if he's the real deal either but last year is a definite feather in his cap. 

ldevon1

November 10th, 2020 at 11:53 AM ^

Really? He beat Fresno State 38 - 35 in overtime, GA Southern 35 - 32, and San Diego St 28 - 21. Add those 3 wins to Michigan every year and Jimmy's record looks a lot better. Things don't look so good this year, so I think the jury is still out on Fleck. If we hold this year against Harbaugh, you have to do the same with Fleck. 

M_Born M_Believer

November 10th, 2020 at 11:31 AM ^

I think it would be a mistake to pass on PJ so quickly.

We are in a position where a coaching search has be done where any viable candidate should be explored and no one should be left off the list immediately.

Look, the criteria I would look for in a new coach would be:

> Demonstrate the ability to BUILD a program - We need to be honest with ourselves and realize that we need to BUILD a program.  We are NOT an elite program, so we accept Bowl bids as an opportunity to BUILD a new legacy, regardless of who we play and where we play.

> Ability to recruit - In particular the ability to recruit above the expectation of programs they were at.  One small factor that we can still hold onto is that Michigan is a national brand new.  Tarnished over the past couple of decades of not meeting lofty expectations, but still a national brand name.  That coupled with the energy to go recruit is the combination we need to look for.

> Youth - I know this may be bias towards older coaches, but hear is my thought.  There is a growing sentiment that we need to turn a new leaf on (It HAS to be connected with Bo).  I would prefer a younger coach with the energetic personality to be a criteria.  Recycling coaches is not the answer.

> Ultra competitive - Look the Death Star is in full operation down south.  It will take a herculean effort to take on the Death Star and beat them at their game.  We will need someone who has it in the deepest soul to beat them.

I realize outside of the first one (and somewhat the second one), it becomes a touchy feely criteria, but these are some of the factors that must be considered.

I also believe that the administration needs to make a decision on whether or not they want to be an elite program of above average.  Knowing what it would take to be an elite -

1) Arm the money cannon - When NIL becomes a reality, line up alums with opportunities that very few schools can offer ($$$ and opportunities)

2) On line classes - My son is currently going to CMU, he took an on line English class last summer.  I can not begin to tell you how easy it was for him to pass the class.  The difference between taking a class online instead of going to an actual classroom is enormous

3) Continue to upgrade the facilities - bottom line, these players / students generate large sums of money for the University and competition for their services are escalating.  Either jump in and compete or just let everyone know that you will put out a 9-3 team that more likely slip to occasionally 6-6 than hit 11-1

MGoStrength

November 10th, 2020 at 11:39 AM ^

I like Fleck.  I like his energy.  I bet he would tear up recruiting up UM.  I feel like his dropoff this year is a talent issue not an Xs & Os issue.  He has no defense, no o-line, and no special teams.  He has great offensive playmakers, but can't get them the ball enough with space to work with.  I'd take PJ in a heart beat.  And, he's not afraid to deal with challenging situations and "cultural pitfalls".  As he says "he eats difficult questions for breakfast".  I think he has the kind of personality and energy to turn around UM and face OSU head on.

Chipper1221

November 10th, 2020 at 9:35 AM ^

THIS: Ace: The last two games also reflected problems we’ve been discussing for years and saw coming before the season started.

How many times did we make excuses for the poor recruiting efforts. Yes Gattis sucks. Yes Don should have known his personnel was unfit for man to man. But the bottom line is you cannot let these sort of roster gaps happen in year 6. Not to mention kids transferring and leaving early when they clearly aren't ready to leave early, compound that with assistants leaving to take demotions/lateral moves. 

 

1VaBlue1

November 10th, 2020 at 10:30 AM ^

I remember back when Pep was finally let go, someone (may have been UMBig11) said that they'd practice one game plan all week, and Harbaugh would make changes to it on Friday or Saturday.  Seems like that may be happening again, if they're even practicing a game plan.

The point is, I don't believe we're seeing Gattis running the offense.  What we are seeing is the same thing that's been happening to the offense every year since 2017 - an occasional game with a wide open offense; and bunches of uninspiring, lackluster, 'old-school' power sets that force the run game between the tackles when it's not there.  Have to be a run first team, right?

The only common denominator through years filled with different OC's, with each of them having a different scheme, is Jim Harbaugh.

CompleteLunacy

November 10th, 2020 at 11:15 AM ^

After seeing what Gattis has done in games like last year vs. Penn State (2nd half) and vs. MSU, and this year vs. Minnesota...compared to the dull performances last couple of weeks that look suspiciously like Michigan teams pre-Gattis...it's hard NOT to think Harbaugh is playing a significant role in hamstringing what Gattis is doing. I mean it could also be Gattis was overrated and is a bad gamecaller, but we've seen flashes of brilliance in his gameplanning and gamecalling that our offenses were missing under Pep. And Harbaugh is an offense guy, and especially as a former QB maybe he's being extra cautious about his QBs in a way that is antiquated and it influences the gameplanning. 

The single greatest mystery is how in the hell Michigan in year 6 with a spread OC still cannot manage to run any sort of hurry-up offense, or something that even resembles one. They spent 5+ of the last ~6-7 minutes methodically driving the field against MSU and seemingly content with getting 5 yards and letting HUGE chunks of time run off. It is the year 2020 and year 6 of your program...this is a major issue.