crazy grandpa

Unverified Voracity Throws Some First Down Markers, As Per Tradition Comment Count

Brian November 20th, 2018 at 3:02 PM

Sponsor note. Let's say you've got some nice first down markers. Got a big X on them. Some orange bits, a pole. You know: the real nice stuff. And let's just say an absurd person gets so angry about something completely unrelated to your markers that he tears them up! You know, hypothetically.

Well, what then? Well, do you have any contracts that might stipulate monetary penalties for this gentleman? No? Do you regret that? Yes? Maybe you should have called Richard Hoeg.

hoeglaw_thumb[1]_thumb_1.jpg

Yes, even though Richard Hoeg was an infant(ish) during this hypothetical event, he may have craftily crafted a legal framework that would allow you to recoup your first down marker costs. Or anything else related to your small business of standing on the sideline with a down marker and something about police horses.

Call today! Or maybe next week, we're all hyperventilating quite hard right now.

A lunatic. Woody Hayes at the end of the Game in 1971:

At the link above MVictors has handily gif'd crucial portions of Hayes's meltdown that you can send to loved ones during moments of crisis. Need to remind your brother-in-law that he may be a grown-ass man but he's got the emotional stability of a toddler who missed his nap? There you go.

Ohio State's current coach has a slightly different approach:

There needs to be an equivalent of the Vince McMahon gif that's just smash cuts to increasingly distressed versions of Meyer culminating in that.

A smooth operator. Bill Bonds fulminates about the overweening importance of The Game, and you know what? He's right.

[After THE JUMP: Don Brown! Luke Yaklich! THE BROTHERS KARA-NAH-SOV]

The man, the mustache. Ivan Maisel on Don Brown:

Harbaugh professed his awe for Brown's ability to correct a flaw in his defense from the sideline.

"He's really gifted at seeing things on the field," Harbaugh said. "Some coaches got to see it from the press box. Some got to wait until they see the film. He stands out to me as being really good, maybe the best I've ever been around that way."

Take last week against Rutgers. The Scarlet Knights' Isiah Pacheco, running out of a three-back set, went 80 yards for a touchdown. Wolverines defensive end Chase Winovich and free safety Tyree Kinnel both bit on a fake reverse, and Pacheco ran inside of them and right up the field. Brown moved his ends wider and put middle linebacker Devin Bush Jr. man-to-man on the tailback.

"They ran it two times for no gain," Bush said, "and they stopped running it."

"I mean, I can't think of any times where he gets hit with the same call twice," Harbaugh said. "Maybe once since he's been here."

Is that ability unusual? "Yeah, that is," Harbaugh said. "It's a gift."

That's a deeply-reported piece worth your time.

At the end of time. Lawrence Marshall winding it up:

This time last year, Lawrence Marshall didn’t know whether or not he’d be back for a fifth year.

At that point — a redshirt junior — Marshall had played in 10 career games, with just nine tackles to show for it. Defensive line coach Greg Mattison approached Marshall after last season and expressed a desire to have him return. Still, Marshall was understandably reticent. He could have easily departed as a grad transfer and found a more regular role elsewhere; it would’ve been hard to blame him.

Then Mattison told Marshall a story that helped bring clarity to the situation. Mattison left Michigan for Notre Dame in 1996, a year before the Wolverines won the national title.

“‘Lawrence, you don’t want to feel that way,’ ” Marshall recalls Mattison saying, “ ‘leaving and Michigan winning a national championship and you left at the wrong time.’

“I was like, ‘I don’t want to be that person.’ ”

Winding it up in a different way. Josh Uche spooling up the jump drive:

The physical talent and pass-rushing ability have always been there. Which begs the question: why did Uche spend his first two seasons at Michigan on the sideline?

“Since being at Michigan," Uche explains, "it’s kind of been a struggle."

As a freshman, Uche tore his meniscus and caught a "bad virus." He played in four games that season. The next year, he suffered a stress fracture in his foot and missed fall camp before seeing limited time in 10 games.

Uche understood why he wasn’t getting many snaps; Michigan’s staff simply didn’t know what he could do. Yet he felt that when he did play, he flashed enough to warrant more snaps.

“It was a battle that was happening with myself,” Uche said. “ ‘I deserve more, but I know why.’ ”

QBs graded. PFF has Patterson third in the Big Ten and there's a big gap back to #4:

NFL beckoning. Kiper's latest rankings feature a lot of Michigan players:

Bredeson that far up the G list is a bit of a surprise. He's playing well but he hasn't really leapt off the field as an obvious NFL player. FWIW, nine cornerbacks were off the board by the end of the second round last year. If the NFL draft advisory board agrees with Kiper at year's end I'd guess both Hill and Long are out the door.

Patterson is not listed in his top ten QBs, FWIW, and Gentry didn't make his TE list. I'd call this "preliminary": OSU fans seem to hate Michael Jordan as their C but he still checks in second.

Many offenses require many vengeances. ESPN's #1 up and coming NFL player at the midpoint of the season? Yuuup:

1. Maurice Hurst, DL, Oakland Raiders

Age: 23 | Snaps through Week 10: 354 | Drafted: Round 5 (2018)

…at this point he's the only thing Raiders fans have any rational reason to be optimistic about. Hurst fits another one of the classic undervalued draft archetypes: the smaller defensive tackle who creates havoc inside yet falls because NFL scouts don't take him seriously because of his size. The patron saint of that category is Aaron Donald, who didn't go in the top 10 despite being the best player in the 2014 draft. We think the Raiders would be very happy if Hurst followed in the more reasonable footsteps of Geno Atkins or Grady Jarrett.

Bad draft day takes about his fall had to be coming from people who didn't watch the tape.

Basketball defense graphed. Got dang:

The "bad" performance in there was against George Washington, which scored 20 of its 61 points after Michigan had taken a 71-39 lead. Seven of those last nine minutes were heavy on freshmen and walk-ons.

Quinn captures some of what makes Michigan so difficult to cope with on that end:

Outside the locker room after Saturday’s win, Livers tried to explain what’s so unique about this team. In reality, he is one of the unique parts. Despite not practicing at the five position in the preseason, he now regularly finds himself there when Beilein shifts to a small-ball lineup. It’s proven wildly effective and is now a mainstay. Beilein tells Livers to think of himself as Draymond Green with the Warriors. This is, in many ways, Michigan’s ideal proxy. Going small spreads out opposing defenses on one end and creates a situation in which its own defense, perhaps the best in college basketball, can switch on every ball screen. “Yes,” Livers said, “Coach B has really taken a liking to it.”

At any given time, though, when starting center Jon Teske checks into the game, Livers shifts to either the three or the four position and Michigan presents an entirely different look. Against Providence, when the Friars feasted on a few offensive rebounds, Beilein fielded a lineup measuring 6-1 (Zavier Simpson), 6-7 (Brazdeikis), 6-6 (Matthews), 6-7 (Livers) and 7-1 (Teske). Moments later, Beilein was back to the small lineup. Afterward, Providence coach Ed Cooley mentioned that Michigan is able to “camouflage” its lineups.

“That’s a fun way to play,” Cooley said.

They can yo-yo between small ball lineups and giant ones, depending on what the opposing offense is trying to do.

Etc.: Both new MSU trustees want to fire John Engler. Lawsuit against three MSU basketball players accused of rape moves forward. The Stanford Orange Bowl mic'd up thing still exists. Speech restrictions are a sign that you may be in an employer-employee relationship. I don't recommend reading this Bill C article on flaws OSU can exploit.

Comments

NateVolk

November 20th, 2018 at 3:50 PM ^

The difference in how the MSM in this State has and is tackling news surrounding sexual assaults at MSU's big two sports v. what we know it would be doing to Beilein and especially Harbaugh.....

It's almost comical how different it would be.

Not to mention the investigations would be taking place with either of them as former coaches. 

Novak-blood

November 20th, 2018 at 4:42 PM ^

Absolutely. Which makes the false narrative of RCMB and the rest of their delusional fan base that the media is "out to get them" and is heavily bias toward UM even more nonsensically jarring. Simply a cesspool of immorality at MSU these days. Glad to hear the pair of newly elected BoT members want Engler out. Absolutely absurd choice from the beginning. They need someone from outside the green-tinted echo chamber.

Denard In Space

November 20th, 2018 at 3:52 PM ^

I started out this season feeling great about the team but resigned to not being able to win it all because of Duke being so incredibly talent-laden. I figured we were in line for a big ten chip, and a good tournament run, but that the ceiling was firm because of shooting and free throws. 

But seeing this team play defense against Nova, and then looking at these numbers, I'm just blown away.  It feels like, for as ridiculous and spectacular as Duke is, that's kind of what we're doing on defense.  I've never seen a college team play in sync and as a unit so effectively.  They move together off-ball and almost never mess up on switches or help defense.  Jon Teske is also one of the most talented big men at shot alteration I can remember in college; he's like Rudy Gobert in his ability to just go straight up and affect shots. And of course, having an actual rabid wolverine as a point guard makes this defense all the more terrifying and malevolent.  

TL;DR: I think M's defense has the potential to be all-time great. What would happen if we met Duke right now and also at the end of the year?  

Jonesy

November 20th, 2018 at 6:38 PM ^

Our defense played Nova fine, what they, nor anybody, could handle was a bench player going NBA JAM on fire against them. Take out either the best bench performance in the history of the finals (and one of the best ever, period) or Michigan's historically bad 3 pt % and its an even game, take out both and we win easily.

Wolverine 73

November 20th, 2018 at 3:53 PM ^

I have often asked myself “when did the hatred between OSU and Michigan rise to the current level,” and I always go back to the 1968 and 1969 games.  It was always a rivalry, but Hayes lost his mind when he went for 2 points late with a big lead and justified it by saying he did it because he “couldn’t go for three.”  Then he lost to Michigan the next year, in what remains to this day my favorite Michigan game ever.  Those things together with Hayes growing older and losing self control, let to tantrums like the one he pulled after the Darden interception.  Eventually, the entire  fanbase jumped the shark with him,  and the stories about cars turned upside down, adults yelling at kids from opposing schools, assaults on people and the like started to recur more frequently.  A friend reported walking quietly back to his car in Columbus several years ago after a Michigan loss, and being screamed at by people the entire way, including one college girl who ran in front of him, got six inches from his face and screamed “Fuck you!  Fuck you!”  I mean, who, even when pretty drunk, acts like that?   

jmblue

November 20th, 2018 at 4:40 PM ^

I think Woody was always unhinged when it came to Michigan.  He also ran up the score and went for two against us in the 1961 game, a 50-20 win (take a look at the score summary in that one). 

OSU was the schoolyard bully trying to humiliate Michigan for years.  Finally, with Bo, we were able to fight back and suddenly the bully couldn't take it.   

Merlin.64

November 20th, 2018 at 4:41 PM ^

Yes, FWIW, my recollection of the 1964-65 season was of a fierce rivalry between two proud programs that viewed each other with respect. The level of hostility and anger among some of the fans these days is disturbing.

But what do I know? We old dudes are always complaining about the behavior of the younger generation. Still, the loss of civility is hardly something to celebrate, even if it is understandable in highly competitive situations. And tantrums seem childish at any age. Not one of the better moments in the career of an esteemed coach.

Arb lover

November 20th, 2018 at 4:20 PM ^

I like that Bill Connelly's closing argument is that teams that score more points per possession (opportunity) usually win games. Rain is wet, but he puts it out there like he has discovered the motherload of all statistical insights.

teams that win the points-per-opportunity battle in 2018 are 129-55, a win percentage of 70

matty blue

November 20th, 2018 at 5:05 PM ^

again - any scout who actually watched mo hurst play last year and DIDN'T run to his g.m. screaming "draft this guy" at the top of his lungs should be fired for incompetence.

i'm only slightly kidding.

why is it you never, EVER hear anyone come out after this kind of shit and say, "you know what, we missed on that guy?"

M-Dog

November 20th, 2018 at 6:56 PM ^

My favorite part about the Harbaugh Stanford Orange Bowl mic'd up video has always been the part at 1:17.

As intense and competitive as Harbaugh is, he was straight up with the VT player when he asked if he was out of bounds.  "No, you were in."

Harbaugh respects the game too much to do anything deceitful.  That the VT player would even ask Harbaugh in the first place, shows how much he is respected in the game.

 

GarMoe

November 20th, 2018 at 9:50 PM ^

I grew up listening to that schmuck Bill Bonds, talk about a drama queen hater - he was numero uno.   “......all while the serious problems of our society go ignored .”   Huh?    What a moronic distortion.   One could say it is because of serious societal problems that The Game has such joyous importance, or because of the fact indeed we try but cannot remove some problems in society (ie, human nature).   So according to Bonds we should get excited instead over a good ol game of chess?   

Shuperstar

November 21st, 2018 at 8:49 AM ^

Love the Bill Bonds video clip... Nice to harken back to the days when a newscaster could provide some wit and humor.  These character traits are now extinct in those who report the news...