[Bryan Fuller]

Preview: Iowa 2022 Comment Count

Brian September 30th, 2022 at 1:51 PM

Essentials

WHAT #4 Michigan (4-0) vs Iowa (3-1)  

0918oldgold2

WHERE Kinnick Stadium
Iowa City, IA
WHEN Noon Eastern
THE LINE M –10.5
TELEVISION FOX (Johnson/Klatt)
TICKETS From $89.
WEATHER

Sunny, high 60s
0% chance of rain
nominal wind

Overview

If you thought Maryland was half a team, hoo boy you ain't seen nothing yet. Per SP+, the Terrapins are currently 14th on offense and 66th on defense. That's a big gap. Iowa? Iowa is 1st on defense and 101st on offense. And that might understate affairs. Just look at the raw numbers:

Ye gods.

The Hawkeyes won a game 7-3 without scoring a touchdown, lost a game 10-7, and saw their defense outscore their offense in a 27-10 win over Rutgers. They also beat Nevada 27-0 in a game that lasted seven hours thanks to a lightning delay.

There's unwatchable, and then there's 2022 Iowa. On the bright side, it looks like a perfect day for football.

[After THE JUMP: half a person]

---------------------

Run Offense vs Iowa

51728663285_f13ae9bb7a_k

[Patrick Barron]

So. Despite the shiny top-line number (34 carries, 211 yards, 6.1 YPC), the dam did not exactly break in last year's Iowa game. Blake Corum had the one explosive that was step one in putting the game to bed but had seven yards on his other four carries; Hassan Haskins scuffled to 3.3 YPC with a long of 11.

Where Michigan made its hay was largely on the outside. End-arounds to AJ Henning and Cornelius Johnson picked up 46 yards; McCarthy's four runs went for 5.8 a pop, and the crushing Corum run was opened up by two different Hawkeyes worrying about McCarthy's legs:

The prescription would seem clear: shift the run game more towards McCarthy's legs—and the threat of said legs. Make Iowa run sideline to sideline. (And then hit them with the double pass.) It's possible loading up a la Maryland will still work—and I'm sure we'll see Michigan run some 3TE sets out there just to see how Iowa does with that—but this is a team that goes up against a paleolithic offense in practice daily. I'd rather have Iowa defenders try to keep up on the edges, or at least be forced to account for them. This is a pass but you get the idea:

Both Jack Campbell and Seth Benson are well drilled on where to be, but they are not Devin Bush athletic when you make them move in space. Rutgers didn't test those guys in the run game outside the tackles enough for my taste, but they did expose softness in coverage:

LB #31

Campbell is a split second late to realize it and he doesn't have the athleticism to make that up.

This is because Iowa's defense has been a wall on the ground for a year and change. A slightly sproingy wall, but a wall nonetheless. The Michigan outburst was the worst performance of the year for the Hawkeyes. Opponents managed 3.2 YPC, which was second in the league to Wisconsin. The line stats from that season aren't eyepopping but they do tell a tale of a defense that leaks yards slowly and puts you in third and medium over and over: 34th in line yards allowed, 22nd in opportunity rate allowed, 93rd in stuff rate. You can have two to four yards. Good luck building a life with that.

Things are much the same this year. Iowa brought back five of their front seven and plugged in seniors at the other two spots. Iowa State and Rutgers have both struggled to do much. ISU's Jirehl Brock did manage to get to 100 yards but it took him 27 carries to get there—see those line stats above.

One personnel note: Iowa can flip between a 4-2-5 and a 4-3 but their third linebacker, Jestin Jacobs, is out for the season. That leaves little-used fifth-year senior Logan Klemp as the beefier option, so Michigan might explore if they can continue going off tackle with those two tight end packages.

KEY MATCHUP: MCCARTHY vs MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCE OF ABILITY TO READ MESH POINTS THAT ARISES WHEN SOMEONE HAS BEEN NAMED MICHIGAN'S STARTING QUARTERBACK. He'll have some opportunities to rip off chunks. Just needs to take them.

Pass Offense vs Iowa

51726701443_e434279e0d_k

om [Patrick Barron]

JJ McCarthy's wobbles against a surprisingly in-the-area Maryland secondary have been ruthlessly scrutinized for a week, and now here's a blistering midterm exam. Iowa allowed 6.4 YPA last year with 16 touchdowns allowed against 25(!!!) interceptions. You could point to that latter as an outlier that should regress to the mean heavily… if Iowa hadn't put up 19-21 INTs in 2018, 2017, and 2015. That's four of the last six complete seasons.

This year they're off to a similar start with 4 YPA allowed and 5 picks through four games, and why not? Iowa returns seven starters from last year's defense and plugged in a second-year cornerback opposite returning Big Ten DB of the year Riley Moss who's doing just fine. That gentleman is Cooper DeJean:

That was a theme I found with DeJean, consistently great coverage. Here the ball is overthrown by Evan Simon but it helps that DeJean has pressed his receiver right off the field … With Terry Roberts out, DeJean moved from spending some time at the CASH position to being a full-time outside corner and he rocked in that role, the best Iowa DB on the field. When you combine that with the usually great Moss, this will be an intriguing test for the Michigan receivers.

The Iowa DBs are not sneaky great athletes who somehow escaped notice—Moss is generally projected as a fringe NFL draft prospect—but they are borderline NFL guys who relentlessly rep the thing Iowa has done for forever.

This is cover two, of course, but don't overplay the literal "cover two" thing too much—Iowa does provide a blizzard of different zone looks and the occasional man-to-man changeup. This is not a Don Brown situation where you can rely on one thing over and over again. McCarthy is probably going to throw into coverage more than once. What happens when that happens will go a long way towards determining the outcome.

Iowa has gathered a decent number of sacks so far this year but Alex didn't detect someone on the DL who was particularly dangerous, and found a defense that was completely happy to sit back and let The Last Of Us Rutgers Quarterbacks try to make up a three-score deficit:

They rushed more than four guys on just 13.9% of plays, the lowest number I can remember tracking. They also rushed fewer than four players on zero snaps in this game, meaning that it was a four man rush all the time.

Assuming Michigan does not spot Iowa two defensive touchdowns the Hawkeyes will be more pressed to create havoc; I expect that blitz rate to be higher if Michigan can stake itself to a lead. If Michigan struggles and gets in a rock fight McCarthy is going to be presented with seven guys looking right at him for any mistake.

KEY MATCHUP: MCCARTHY vs HOLE SHOTS. I know I just said it's not cover two all the time, but it is cover two a lot of the time, and even the best cover two teams are vulnerable to the hole shot, a ball behind the cornerback and outside of the safety. Expect Michigan to put a lot of flat frippery out there to help draw up that corner—or task Iowa LB with Corum in space—and give McCarthy the opportunity to show off his arm.

Run Defense vs Iowa

51724519402_5fb2dfa290_k

there's a Williams in there somewhere [Bryan Fuller]

And here we come to the grimly grim portion of the proceedings. Last year Tyler Goodson and a Rimington winner at center kinda-sorta kept things afloat. By this I mean they could put up lines like "52 carries for 172 yards against Illinois." They still finished 11th in the league in YPC at 3.4. Very not great, but not Purdue.

The wheels—already hanging on by a rusted bolt—have come off. This year they're at 3.0 YPC, dead last in the league by 0.4 yards per rush. They are 1.4 YPC behind Michigan State. This is in part because Iowa's nonconference schedule features a real team (Iowa State) and a generally very good FCS team (South Dakota State), but the Hawkeyes put up 1.6 and 2.3 YPC in those games. There is no level of "oops we scheduled sneaky good" that covers that. 3.4 YPC against Rutgers counts as a win. Dios mio.

We mentioned Maryland's abysmal line yards last week because they returned all five OL; looks like they've improved. Iowa has taken a major step back from last year. To drive the point home it's a major step back from this:

  • Line yards: 112th.
  • Standard down line yards: 119th.
  • Opportunity rate: 101st.
  • Power success rate: 77th
  • Stuff rate: 113th.

Insofar as that is possible.

Iowa runs out a three-headed tailback; all are underclassmen and all have extremely boring names. At least the Maryland linebacker level was a veritable cornucopia of mellifluous nomenclature. Here you've got two Williamses and a Johnson. Alex likes a Williams best

I thought Leshon Williams was the best of the Iowa RBs. This play sees him wiggle through a small hole created by his OL and then turn it into a sizable run:

…As a whole, though, Leshon Williams is not a star, and neither are Gavin Williams or Kaleb Johnson. Both halves of the Williams duo can be used in the passing game. They're not going to be torching LBs on wheel routes, but you have to account for the screen possibility.

The offensive line is even more of an issue than last year—and if you're looking for a reason this might be a terminal death spiral for Kirk Ferentz this is it—with two cyaned guys in FFFF and nobody who's looking like an NFL player, or even All Big Ten player.

As far as style of play, it's Iowa. They are an under-center team that is almost entirely zone-based running, with a heavy dose of stretch. That goes nowhere.

KEY MATCHUP: MICHIGAN DEFENSIVE TACKLES vs GETTING REACHED. Going up a heavy dose of stretch is always a test for the lateral mobility of your defensive tackles. Michigan should be pretty good in this department, especially relative to Iowa opponents to date, but until you see it you don't truly know.

Pass Defense vs Iowa

51725759669_1ae02f7ecf_k

this is going to LaPorta [Bryan Fuller]

Bracket Sam LaPorta, man up otherwise, the end.

If you insist upon continuing to read this section, here's a Boggling Iowa Stat from Alex:

The WR level remains strikingly under-used, with just 16 catches in 4 games this season going to WRs(!!!!) and that is the result of only 45 targets being thrown their way in total.

In fact, pick your boggling stat. I prefer that Iowa receivers are bringing in 33% of their targets but you choose. It'll be fun for you. Here's another boggling stat: Charlie "Chuck Sizzle" Jones transferred from Iowa to Purdue this offseason. He has 41 catches for 533 yards with the Boilers. Iowa—ALL OF IOWA—has 524 receiving yards.

With Keagan Johnson out for this game, LaPorta and Arland Bruce IV will be the main targets outside of dump-downs to TE #2, Luke Lachey, and the running backs. WR #2 is Nico Ragani; he has played only two of the four games and has two catches on the year. The Iowa WR room has been raided and not replaced:

Iowa lost four scholarship wide receivers, with only one scholarship player at the position in the incoming recruiting class.

Even if Jones’ transfer happened early enough in the spring to seek a suitable transfer option, Ferentz has not been as keen on acquiring talent via the portal as many of his Power Five counterparts.

“There was one receiver that we engaged in conversation with and recruited, and he chose a different place,” Ferentz said. “I'm not saying we're going to shut that market down totally, but it's really not how we're looking to build a team.”

On top of that they've suffered injuries to a couple of scholarship players. This is the least intimidating WR group in the conference.

Spencer Petras is still the Iowa quarterback. Alex on Petras:

Marginal, bordering on inaccurate throws still pop up for Petras, as they did last year. Here's one thrown behind LaPorta (you see how much they target him now, eh?) that the TE has a shot to snag but can't bring in because it's a foot to the right of where it needs to be:

In summation, Petras is a QB that has, over the past two seasons, thrown 11 TD to 11 INT and completed 55.8% of his passes for 6.3 Y/A. He is a Checkdown Charlie who throws primarily within 5-10 yards of the line of scrimmage or screens, has only one target he feels comfortable with, and is not capable of hurting you with his legs in any substantial manner. Petras' arm is not very strong and it is not very accurate. He would hold back any offense, but on Iowa, Petras is merely a bad cog in an offense with lots of bad cogs.

The Iowa folks I follow on Twitter were stupefied when Petras was not replaced after the Iowa State loss, but from what we've seen of Alex Padilla he's not changing the equation here.

And on top of all that, the offensive line is a sieve. They've given up nine sacks against just 94 passing attempts. A 9% sack rate would have been around 120th nationally last year, and that's after games against South Dakota State, Iowa State, Nevada, and Rutgers. Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln…

KEY MATCHUP: MICHIGAN vs GREAT GOOGLY-MOOGLY BUSTS. The main way this doesn't go well is for Michigan to run into each other, Keystone Kops-style.

SPECIAL TEAMS

This is, as ever, a strength for Iowa. They currently sit 13th in FEI's special teams ratings with acceptable to good rankings in every category. Punter Tory Taylor already has 28 punts this year, nine more than the Big Ten's second most-active punter (Indiana's James Evans). He's whacking them a long way, 47 yards gross, and has suffered less than one return yard per punt. The only thing that's holding him back in efficiency—Iowa is 26th—is five touchbacks.

Iowa had to break in a new kicker this year after Caleb Shudak graduated. Ryan Blom was 1/3 in the first two games and was then replaced by freshman Drew Stevens, who is 4/4. If only Iowa had as quick a hook for obviously incompetent offensive coordinators. We have close to zero data on Stevens, so expect whatever shaded towards good, because Iowa. There was probably a reason he was behind Blom, though.

Stevens also kicks off. 11/16 have gone in the endzone and nothing interesting has happened on the other five.

Bruce returns punts. His ten attempts are averaging about 7 yards a pop. More interesting is that DE Lukas Van Ness blocked two punts against Iowa State due to—yep—a defect in ISU's shield coverage:

“We noticed Iowa State had its two guys in a shield to protect the punter,” Van Ness said. “They were offset off the line a little, so they had me line up and it gave me a straight shot to run at the shield and block a couple of punts."

That shouldn't apply to Michigan, but if anyone's going to throw the kitchen sink at Michigan punts in a desperate attempt to get a short field it's Iowa.

Iowa has has had a couple chunk kickoff returns. Jake Moody is getting touchbacks on 72% of his KOs and have returned only three all season so Iowa's unlikely to get more than one or two cracks at something.

FWIW, Michigan is up to #2 in FEIST.

KEY MATCHUP:  AHHHH YOU CONTINUE DOING EVERYTHING THE BEST

INTANGIBLES

images (3)

CHEAP THRILLS

Worry if…

  • Iowa's ground game comes alive because Michigan linebackers aren't in the right gaps.
  • McCarthy is struck dumb by the Iowa zone.
  • Iowa punts it off their own player and recovers it behind the line of scrimmage and advances it for a first down.

Cackle with knowing glee if…

  • The deep ball is recalibrated successfully.
  • Corum/Edwards get in man coverage against linebackers.
  • Spencer Petras.

Fear/Paranoia Level: 3 (Baseline: 5; –1 for 42-3 Last Year And This Looks Like A Much Worse Iowa Team, –1 for You Rushed For What Against Who?, –1 for Literally Two Scholarship Receivers Available, –1 for Brian Ferentz, –1 for In Soviet Russia, Michigan Out-Special-Teamses Iowa, +1 for Weird Kinnick Juju, +1 for Young Quarterback Against Tricksy Hobbitses, +1 for First Road Game Of Year)

Desperate need to win level: 9 (Baseline: 5; +1 for Kinnick Exorcism, +1 for If We Lose The Score Is Going To Be 11-8 Or Something And People Will Be Like "Remember That 11-8 Game" Until We All Die, +1 for Hey Want To Go To The CFP Or Rose Bowl? Don't Lose This Game, +1 for Must Win The Battle Of The Nepotisms)

Loss will cause me to… *loading shotgun* corn's haunted

Win will cause me to… construct elaborate justifications for why everything JJ McCarthy did was according to Juche, even that pick six.

The strictures and conventions of sportswriting compel me to predict:

The Big Ten championship game part two. This is not to say "42-3 blowout" but a game that either looks like a desperate rock fight if Michigan does not get some early explosives or a 42-3 blowout. When Michigan does deviate from "these guys can't score without our help" conservatism I expect a lot of deep balls. They're relatively safe, Iowa meandering pick six last week notwithstanding, and Michigan has some dudes who can run by heady but not massively athletic members of the secondary. If they hit more often this is comfortable.

If not… still probably comfortable, but it'll take until the fourth quarter to feel like that.

Iowa's offense looks so beyond bad that they cannot win without two or three devastating Michigan own-goals. They have no explosion anywhere, and are they going to drive the field against an upper echelon Big Ten defense when they couldn't against South Dakota State and Iowa State? Maybe once. Maaaaaybe twice. Outside of that, no.

Finally, three opportunities for me to look stupid on Saturday:

  • Edwards and/or Henning have explosive days running away from Iowa linebackers on underneath routes after outside guys have run off corners.
  • Eyabi Okie emerges as a potential solution at WDE.
  • McCarthy settles down after wobbly Maryland game, has a couple of bad moments, hits some hole shots, and puts up 8-9 YPA.
  • Michigan 29, Iowa 9

Comments

Blue Vet

September 30th, 2022 at 2:32 PM ^

Haunted corn notwithstanding (not standing in the field?), wave at the kids for positive energy.

Then, for actual football, "AHHHH YOU CONTINUE DOING EVERYTHING THE BEST." 

DMThomasPRE

September 30th, 2022 at 2:41 PM ^

Should I drive up from Missouri to watch?

PROS

  • Haven't seen UM play irl since 2011
  • seems like a nice day
  • tickets price dropping 

CONS

  • Having to watch 3 hours of IOWA football
  • The price of gas
  • Must drive through Missouri and Iowa to watch 3 hours of Iowa football

RockinLoud

September 30th, 2022 at 2:43 PM ^

Alright, here's my prediction:

Iowa wins 20 - 16. They get one TD on offense after some inexplicable drive they manage to put together, plus a defensive TD, plus 2 field goals after UM turnovers gives them a short field. McCarthy has 3 TO's, 2 picks and a fumble. Man I'd love to be wrong, but this just has that type of game written all over it.

Dunder

September 30th, 2022 at 3:34 PM ^

I get it, football is weird, football in Iowa brings out massive BPONE.

While I'm not a licensed therapist, my prescription to heal what ails you is two long TDs to Wilson and one lightning bolt of a play from Henning (I'm thinking on a short pass) and a big UM lead by the half. 

MGoCali

September 30th, 2022 at 2:47 PM ^

16 kickoffs for Iowa. Let's break that down.

In four games, they have kicked off:

  • 4 times to start a half
  • after 5 field goals
  • after 7 touchdowns

Two of the touchdowns were by the defense.  

 

 

 

The Homie J

September 30th, 2022 at 2:48 PM ^

MCCARTHY vs MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCE OF ABILITY TO READ MESH POINTS THAT ARISES WHEN SOMEONE HAS BEEN NAMED MICHIGAN'S STARTING QUARTERBACK

Guys, I'm starting to think that Harbaugh doesn't want his starting QB to run the ball that much

Jibbroni

September 30th, 2022 at 3:25 PM ^

If Michigan goes up by two scores in this game and decides to turtle then I am alright with that.  Iowa has trouble scoring.  If they play keep away and dont turn the ball over, I dont see how Iowa can make up a two score deficit.  This is gonna be a lot of end arounds and attacking the edges. If they get up early like the Maryland game, I dont see how Iowa can keep pace.  They dont have Taulia in the pocket to make plays with his arm and feet.  Discipline. 

gustave ferbert

September 30th, 2022 at 3:34 PM ^

We've blocked several punts with Jr. as coach of the special teams.  I believe special teams should be the x factor in this game.  With such a putrid offense they are going to punt often.  It will be worth the risk of punt blocks given they won't  move the ball anyway. 

matty blue

September 30th, 2022 at 3:52 PM ^

holy crap, you predicted exactly the same score i had in my head, which is either comforting or terrifying.  wait, it's both.

i do think we will outplay them, just based on talent and general aggression.  that doesn't mean we win, of course - turnover luck will almost certainly determine the outcome, in my opinion - but still.  we're better than they are.

much has been made of the 'haven't won at kinnick since 2005' thing, but that's only four games, and if you go game by game,

  • 2009 - #12 iowa 30, michigan 28 - iowa was very good (they'd finish 11-2), and we weren't.  richrod's second season, starting to come around, but still generally mediocre...tate forcier crapped the bed, but denard almost pulled it out late.
  • 2011 - iowa 24, #13 michigan 16 - the one big exception to brady hoke's horseshoe season...denard was pretty lousy...and iowa may have been more comparable than the rankings suggested.
  • 2013 - iowa 24, michigan 21 - really, really grim.  michigan had lost 3 of 5 (the exceptions - the Jeremy Gallon Game and a win at northwestern) and this started an 0-3 stretch.  we were pretty lousy at that point.  devin gardner threw for two touchdowns but was 13-28 for 98 yards.
  • 2016 - iowa 14, #2 michigan 13 - sigh.  wilton speight, man.

so by my count, that's one that we 'should' have won, one where we were probably not as good as we thought, and two where we lost to a possibly better team.  the clearest through line, in all four cases, was lousy quarterback play, in every case.  "weird things happen at iowa?  sure, i guess...but these were closer to the years of rose bowl losses under bo, where we either got outplayed or our coaches had their heads up their asses.  i’d also note that we were also 6-1-1 at iowa from 1985 to 2005...i believe those games were also played at kinnick, were they not?  

my point being there’s no jinx, and we’ll never mention it again if we get anything at all from j.j.  there’s no reason to think we won’t.

we got this.

 

WesternWolverine96

September 30th, 2022 at 4:06 PM ^

those of us who've been watching for multiple decades know to worry about road games at Iowa or Wisconsin (and any MSU game no matter what the record)

I think we will win, but I don't know that we will win

Mr. Elbel

September 30th, 2022 at 4:14 PM ^

Will be a big test for our O line to hold up. It was kinda glossed over here, but this is still by far the biggest test they've gotten this year, despite no dangermen on Iowa's DL. If JJ is running for his life even a little bit, it could lead to those 2-3 errors Iowa needs to win this game.

Still, I think our playmakers win this game for us in the end. We have too many weapons, especially if Edwards is back. Even if we turn the ball over, I don't think they'll necessarily be able to score off of those turnovers. The iffy-ness of our LBs is harder to take advantage of in the red zone, especially for this "offense." I think it will feel like a blowout without actually being a blow out because I think we do spot them a number of turnovers, but D holds strong.

M 24-10

bronxblue

September 30th, 2022 at 5:03 PM ^

McCarthy is going to struggle at times and I think it'll be a game-ish into the 4th but UM is the better team and the delta between Michigan's pretty good defense and Iowa's elite unit is way smaller than the gap between UM's really good offense and Iowa's bottom-of-the-barrel unit.  That's the difference here to me - UM can win a rock fight but Iowa can't win a shootout.

 

Going to be nervous until the final whistle but Iowa is somehow worse than I thought they'd be this year.

Perkis-Size Me

September 30th, 2022 at 5:08 PM ^

Iowa can't win this game without Michigan committing probably at least two turnovers, at least one of which needs to result in seven points, and a Herculean effort from their defense. Michigan does not lose this game unless Michigan beats itself. Hard for me to envision Iowa generating more than 10-14 points on offense.

But the ingredients are certainly there for Iowa to be able to make this a game and even steal a win. All comes down to whether or not McCarthy makes smart decisions. If he wants to take a shot or two early if Wilson, Bell or Johnson get open, then go ahead. But if he tries to play hero ball, that is just doing exactly what Iowa wants him to do. 

Make smart decisions, throw the ball away if nothing is there, and live to fight another day. There is almost no plausible scenario where Michigan goes down by enough points in this game that McCarthy HAS to resort to hero ball. Just take what they give you. On defense, just make anyone other than La Porta beat you. 

The Sea Was Angry

September 30th, 2022 at 5:13 PM ^

The bad news: I have a seriously awful feeling about this game. I've been around long enough to know that Kirk Ferentz somehow channels some Hayden Frey magic when they play Michigan. My prediction: Iowa--low score; Michigan--lower

The good news: I've been around long enough to know that I am incredibly bad at predicting sports outcomes. So...place your bets--I predict an Iowa win!

 

 

The Sea Was Angry

October 2nd, 2022 at 12:56 PM ^

Yes, I neglected to mention the fact that it was an Iowa home game yesterday, and that's where the juju often resides (although I recall a certain game in 1981 I attended in Ann Arbor. Hayden Frey was alive and well, creating the havoc that has often haunted us ever since). 

Glad to see my prediction skills were right on (a.k.a., completely wrong) once again!

ATS_Dominance

September 30th, 2022 at 5:43 PM ^

A lot of folks on here have mentioned turnovers as a way Iowa can hang in this game. Certainly true but penalties can also be that factor. We absolutely cannot make mental errors and give these guys extra downs or extra chances. A dumb personal foul or roughing the kicker is just what they need to stay in the game. Play smart and let the players make plays.

GO BLUE!!

superstringer

September 30th, 2022 at 5:45 PM ^

So...

Iowa is #1 in Scoring Defense.

Iowa is #131 in Scoring Offense.

?!?!?!

Is that... even physically possible?  Has a team ever been #1 in one significant major category and dead last on the other side of the ball (like after more than a game or two)?  This makes my brain numb trying to just conceive of the problem.  It's like "what came before the Big Bang."  (No, not the show, the actual Big Bang (YTBB).)  How can you be so good at stopping scoring, giving your offense lots of opportunities, but be so bad you never actually score...

Blue in St Lou

September 30th, 2022 at 7:11 PM ^

So I'm sitting on my deck on a beautiful evening, enjoying one of my favorite drinks (a Bombay Sapphire martini with a 4-1 gin-to-vermouth ratio), and I read this:

"+1 for If We Lose The Score Is Going To Be 11-8 Or Something And People Will Be Like "Remember That 11-8 Game" Until We All Die."

I burst out in uproarious laughter. Fortunately, none of my neighbors could hear. My wife was preparing our appetizers to accompany our cocktails (she's having an Old Fashioned), and she says, "What's so funny? Oh, I know. You're reading MGoBlog."

AlbanyBlue

September 30th, 2022 at 7:43 PM ^

I literally have no idea about this game. And this preview didn't help. So I'll throw some thoughts down.

On defense, of course we have to stop the run, and I think we will do a good job of that, assuming our LBs have looked at the film from last week and now understand they have to be aggressive and fill. I like the idea of Paige on the field rather than Sainristil to bolster the run D. As far as the pass, bracket LaPorta and be all over the screen and waggle game. That's it. Of course Ferentz will try some stuff, because he's playing Michigan, but I don't think it's a huge concern. Iowa's offense scored 13 against Rutgers -- they won't score more than 10 against us.

On offense, this is where I just don't know, man. On paper, we have an explosive offense that should be able to blast Iowa out of its own stadium. By all rights, this thing should be over by halftime.

BUT

First road game, for team and QB. Opportunistic D specializing in turning mistakes into game-changing scoring plays. QB that has shown he will make some of said mistakes. Temptation is there to slog through a rock fight for more safety. I think the coaching staff probably gives in to this temptation.

Iowa gets one defensive touchdown and scores 13 or 16. Buoyed by the positivity of last season and the potential of this offense, I'll say Michigan scores between 19 and 23.

Michigan wins, but it's close and not a fun game to watch. I'll say 19-13.

Finally, a hot take -- we'll be behind at the half.

username03

September 30th, 2022 at 8:19 PM ^

I think the singular focus on avoiding turnovers is misplaced. If we score 30, how many times can we turn the ball over and still win? I’d guess at least 3. I think our focus should be on scoring TDs. 

uminks

October 1st, 2022 at 1:46 AM ^

For some reason many of the national pundits are looking at our game in the upset alert category? Only way M could lose this game if they turn over the ball often leading to IA points but if M makes few mistakes and JJ has a decent day I could see a 31-16 type win!