gopoohgo

March 10th, 2015 at 12:01 AM ^

Not a lawyer, but I thought the basis of discrimination lawsuits did not have to include specific or personal threats/actions against an individual, but rather a workplace/environment deemed hostile against a class (race, gender, sexual orientation) of people.

So putting up pinups of naked women all over a predominantly male workplace can create a hostile environment for the women...

Not sure what is going to happen to the students identified in the video...but would bet there would be a crapload of pressure to expel them from OU...and like you, unsure if they have legal grounds to do so.

OccaM

March 9th, 2015 at 11:19 PM ^

It's not just speech. Did you miss the "There will never be a n----- at SAE" part?

It's not a great leap in logic to assume these idiots are actually selecting people based on race.

That's discrimination. SAE is affiliated with OU, and OU with said federal laws. I'm guessing that discrimination based on race is illegal somewhere in there.

So no I don't think it is a slippery slope. 

gopoohgo

March 9th, 2015 at 11:24 PM ^

This maybe more of a question for MGoLawyers, but I thought while repugnant, private societies/clubs can include/exclude anyone they want? Augusta is a perfect example...

As long as they are not receiving public funds...and I don't know if frats/sororities gets funding via the student activities portion of tuition?

Mr Miggle

March 10th, 2015 at 9:16 AM ^

being allowed to exist and being allowed a place in the universtiy's Greek system. All schools have guidelines for what's necessary to be officially sanctioned. Even the chess club would have to promise to abide by non-discrimination rules. If groups want to be truly private and unaffiliated with the school, they can follow Augusta's example.

baldurblue

March 9th, 2015 at 11:29 PM ^

If the frat is violating rules, assuming discriminating against potential members based on race is against the rules, or if there is further evidence that the frat violates code of conduct, than they should be shut down.  But I would argue that the students' speech is protected by the first ammendment, and they should not be expelled for it.  The students are proteceted, the fraternity is not.

Sac Fly

March 10th, 2015 at 12:20 AM ^

It's a very slippery slope.

By threatening students with expulsion for using a word or being accused of being a racist, you put the power to ruin a life in the hands of everyone.

You can not approach a problem like this because eventually it would turn into McCarthyism.

OccaM

March 10th, 2015 at 12:28 AM ^

This specific case.

You got video evidence of them suggesting there will not be certain people allowed in said frat. If witnesses come forward etc, and it is proven that they did actively discriminate, then how is this relatable to McCarthyism? 

I'm not advocating for their expulsion, but I can see how it wouldn't be wrong to do so. We're not throwing them in jail. College is a privilege and when you say stupid stuff you can lose those privileges. 

jmdblue

March 10th, 2015 at 12:33 PM ^

but they didn't break any laws or threaten anyone.  Expulsion is too much.  I do hope the kid leading the charge gets a nice tuneup sometime.  Hopefully, by a hetero, protestant, greek, white dude who just wants to do the right thing.

Perkis-Size Me

March 9th, 2015 at 11:38 PM ^

I actually know one of the guys in that house. We interned at the same company last summer. No idea if he was directly involved in all of this, but regardless, this will follow him and the rest of those boys for a long time. When it makes front page news everywhere from ABC to ESPN, there's no way to hide from it.

Good luck to any one of them on trying to get a job anywhere other than being an assistant janitor at WalMart.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Wendyk5

March 9th, 2015 at 11:45 PM ^

The people in the town I live in have worked for 30+ years to create a place where everyone can co-exist. There is no racial majority in our high school, or if there is one, it's by 1 or 2 percentage points. It's amazing to watch the kids come out of school. They are all together. Racial sensitivity is part of our curriculum, and it's organic in our daily life. We, blacks and whites, interact with each other every day. Half my son's teachers are black, as are his friends. I didn't grow up in an environment like this, but I appreciate the efforts that have gone into giving my kids this opportunity. I am deeply embarrassed by this incident, more so than I expected. I think they will feel this in Evanston as deeply as they feel it in Oklahoma. 

mgoblue0970

March 10th, 2015 at 12:18 AM ^

Racial division these days is generally perpetuated by the media or those with an agenda.  While there is no perfect community or perfect organization, in my experience, what you describe is the rule rather than the exception.  Most people these days don't give a flying fuck about what color one's skin is or who they sleep with.  It's just seems the very vocal minority on each side of the bell curve get all the attention.

Yostbound and Down

March 10th, 2015 at 12:24 AM ^

I'd like to believe that, but I don't think it's true, or if it is, it's a larger percentage at the ends of the bell curve. And because it is perpetuated, it continues to have exposure to younger generations. Hell these frat guys were born at least 25 years after the civil rights movement and where do they get this stuff from? Parents, mentors and their environment, which hasn't much changed.

Just look at what the President has had to deal with in his two terms. FWIW I disagree with him on more than a few political issues, but there is bullshit every day spewing forth out of somebody's mouth mocking him or linking him to a terrorist group, largely because of his race/ethnicity (think there was an incident like that in the news even today). 

Of course YMMV and I would say the vast majority of people I know personally don't have views like this, but it definitely is out there.

mgoblue0970

March 10th, 2015 at 10:55 AM ^

I never meant to imply people don't or shouldn't all hang together... I was born in Detroit, I've traveled to 40 states and 4 continents and don't keep track of my frequent flyer miles anymore because it really doesn't matter.  I mention this because travel will teach one more about life than any textbook will.

One thing I've learned is people are the same everywhere.  They generally want to provide for their families, leave things better for their kids, and live a peaceful life.  That axiom is true regardless of any social or economic factors, labels, hyphens, etc.

I've learned that for the most part, when you tear down all the bullshit barriers people erect for no good reason, people find that they can be friends with people who don't look like them.

But if you people think the charlatans in popular culture don't have a ve$ted intere$t in keeping divides alive and in the forefront (regardless of ones which occur naturally) you all are sorely mistaken.  

 

Wendyk5

March 10th, 2015 at 8:54 AM ^

I don't know where you live, but the only place where this may be the rule is in big cities. Drive through Indiana or Wisconsin - this is not the case. Go to school in the suburbs of Chicago - this is not the case. This is the first place I've lived in my almost half century where integration is complete and pervasive, and even here, there are social divides by way of what neighborhood you live in. I'm not going to bore everyone with the details, but until you see a community-wide effort for equality focusing on the school system, I think it's easy to take for granted just how divided our country is. I know I took it for granted. 

Clarence Beeks

March 10th, 2015 at 12:20 AM ^

Since there seems to be a public sentiment that this specific chapter has always been this way, I expect we'll hear from Troy Aikman soon (this was his SAE chapter). This chapter has quite a few prominent initiated members in its history.

bjk

March 10th, 2015 at 2:30 PM ^

you're being sarcastic, I think you will find that Oklahoma's 20th-century history conforms closely to that of the former Confederate states -- post-Civil War and early-20th century race riots to reverse Reconstruction, redraw the color line, and impose a system of peonage that amounted to a restoration of slavery in some places only finally overturned by US Attorney General Francis Biddle's Circular No. 3591 of December 11, 1941. (The timing of this circular strongly suggests this was a response to the propaganda necessities imposed by Pearl Harbor and WWII.)

jmdblue

March 10th, 2015 at 12:49 PM ^

northern Maryland just south of DC, cuts through PA into OH, runs through Toledo then north to the IN, MI border, across the northern 1/3 of Illinios, splits Iowa resonably in half, travels along the NE/KS border, then leaves NM and points west to the north.