Harbaugh Monday Presser

Submitted by NeverPunt on September 3rd, 2019 at 9:58 AM

Summary:  (SIAP and if so mods feel free to delete but I didn't see it on the board, though parts of his comments have popped up on the board in various places)

On how young tackles played: They played well, Ryan Hayes was the offensive player of the game. Graded out really well alongside Ruiz and Bredesen. Fine blocks, good with his hands. Jalen was good as well. 

How Sean McKeon has improved: Run blocking, catching the ball, had that nice TD. Leadership and work ethic as well. Another guy in running for the Offensive player of the week.

On the new guys on D:  (Coach answers by running through basically everybody in secondary without much valuable commentary, Lavert missed the INT but played well, happy for Ambry and then is interrupted with a second question about cleaning up miscues). 

On cleaning up miscues on D:  Yeah. (Continues to answer the first question - Aidan, Kwity played well, Jordan Glasgow had good game - runner up for Defensive player of the game, Josh Ross played extremely well). Overall as a defense he thought they played well.

Update on guys who were out:  Jeter, DPJ, Runyan - all three have a chance to play this week.  Dwumfour - we'll see, haven't see him yet today.

Decision on Kicker? They were neck and neck with 1 kick separating them all camp. Moody was the one that was ahead - he would kick first one and then they'd rotate the next kicker for each drive. The guy who was "up" would take the extra point if a TD was scored instead. will keep that going next week.

How was it for him not calling plays? Still same focus for knowing play that was going to be run. He was into it so it didn't feel much different. 

How did he assess Josh Gattis' playcalling:  Thought it was practically flawless. He was decisive in play calling - thought it was  clear, clean, concise game. 

Value of Cam Cheeseman:  Cam had a perfect game. Got the special teams player of the week. He's just consistently good and brings a big body to the formations for punts/FG. He was good in protection and snapping was great. He is a great guy.

Evaluation of QBs:  Both did very well. Shea made some big plays. Ball handling is being addressed. Dylan made some big plays as well. Felt both ran the offense efficiently. So did Joe when he was in. They were accurate and ran the ball well, ran the offense well. Shea was really good against the blitz. Sideline pressure with the CB blitz.  Shea had a clean game in terms of getting them in the right protections and plays. The RBs had a perfect game in protection - every back was 100%. Zach Charbonnet had 9 for 9 - doesn't think any back has gotten that since he's been here. That's like WOW. There were some sophisticated protections going on, changes on the fly by the center, and it was just easy for him - he just handled it. That's rare - he's been around pro backs that don't do it that well. Tru, Christian, BVS had nice pick ups as well. 

Leadership from the captains: Really good. Those five guys are "the guys" - there's some others that are leaders. Khaleke, Ben, Carlo, Shea, Josh are really looked up to on the team. When they talk, people listen, and they're followed. They set a great example. 

Defensive player of the game?: Ambry Thomas.

On Vincent Grey? He played really well. Graded out in the top 6. 4 tacklets, tackle for loss, good in coverage. 

On a freshman RB picking up protections: Jay Harbaugh should get credit here as well. They were all on it. It's eye catching with Zach becomes it seems to come easily to him, which catches your attention. He was great running the ball and hits holes well, catches the ball well.  Christian Turner had some great runs too. The one he made on the boundary was outstanding - very few guys that can keep their feet in bounds there. Extra effort run was great. Ball security was great for this unit. 

On Giles Jackson:  Really good - just told him to SQUEEZE the ball. He was impressive and he's doing the kick returns, got in at WR. His role will grow more. 

With Ryan Hayes doing well, how does the line look with Runyan coming back?  Good question. Runyan is top three lineman on the team. Ryan was really impressive and it is a meritocracy all the way. Can he compete at the other tackle spot? Sure. 

On Tarik and the WR balance if DPJ returns: It's a great problem to have. Good to see C. Johnson get in and play well as well. Mike Sainristil had a good game and you'll see some good things out of him. Ronnie - felt he got held coming out of the break - seen him make that catch otherwise.  The team played well. Two questions we're asking ourselves -  (1) When we're playing really well - is that going to be good enough to beat the best teams on our schedule?  (2) When we weren't playing well - is that good enough to beat those teams?  We have to be ready to make those improvements in sprint mode. All those opponents looked good in week one so we need to get to our best as fast as we can and be successful as quickly as we can. 

On playing service academies:  Been on our mind a long time, we've been preparing for it a long time. Going back to spring practice - it's been on our mind - creating extra time in practice to prep for them. It's a great challenge. Heck of a football team last year - 11-2 last year, big bowl win. Unique offensive style. We're excited to play the game.  They're 5-4 vs us all time, we'd like to even that up.

MoCarrBo

September 3rd, 2019 at 3:00 PM ^

As to why I said perhaps. Nico is 6'4, Black is 6'3 and DPJ is 6'2. Both Avant and Breaston were 6'0. All three have shown great ability. However, they haven't been healthy together nor has Harbaugh thrown the ball enough to really discern the potential of this group.

jbuch002

September 3rd, 2019 at 11:41 AM ^

I'm not convinced Harbaugh doesn't have a significant role in what play(s) goes to the QB from the sideline. There was too much Harbaughesque play calling in the RZ. The failed series from inside the 10 ending with a stuffed 4th and goal from the 1 was an example. There were others. There were less of what I anticipated as play calls representative of the Gattis Effect between the 20s. 

Clearly this is not the 2018 Offense but it's also not as different from it as I thought it would be.  The 2019 run game is based on an IZ/OZ attack using zone and reach blocking techniques that is an extension of what Ed Warinner has been coaching since he got here. 

While there were some spready looking formations that produced a run play from the gun, I didn't see the exotics that would put 4 or 5 receivers out there to spread out the defense.  In response, MTSU ran what looked to me like a 3-4-4 zone with the Ss walking up and concentrating between the OTs most of the time. That defensive approach was dictated by what M was doing offensively - concentrating players between the hash marks. While I did see formations of 3 WRs, stacks and a slotty guy, no exotics with the characteristic 5 receivers threatening the D that I can remember.

The comment up thread that noted M threw more balls to receivers running deep routes than, shorter routes, for example, drags, digs and crossing routes probably had more to do with what the MTSU defense was doing than not. Gattis punished the MTSU D for walking it's Ss up to stop the run - a very typical approach for M's opponents. Pretty sure Patterson was given the authority to and appeared to be getting the offense into a play that was designed to exploit that with a deep ball into single coverage for Collins or a seam route for a TE.

Fundamentally, the offense still looks a lot like a Harbaugh influenced one, not a predominantly Gattis influenced one. Certainly, there is a lot more passing and less running plays. That's a Gattis effect. There are more read-options and run-pass-option plays and I don't think M ran a single play from under center. That's a Gattis effect. However, I didn't see those drag, slant and dig routes designed to get a miss-match with a slower LB - the speed in space thing - to the extent I expected them. Black had one ..... ONE! catch on a slant. Need MORE. I'd also like to see more exotic formations that put 5 receivers side line to sideline.

Sten Carlson

September 3rd, 2019 at 5:48 PM ^

I said this before elsewhere, but in re: short yardage and the use of a FB I'll bet Harbaugh asked Gattis how he planned to run goal line/short yardage, Gattis told him, and Harbaugh said something to the effect of, "Ok, it's your offense, but … " Meaning, Harbaugh is going to let him do it his way  but if it's ineffective they'll make adjustments.  I don't think that this is too much of a concession, especially with Ben Mason on the roster.  I think the play against MTSU was a first go at a shotgun goal line formation, it wasn't a terrible play, it was just poorly timed and MTSU got a better push.  Further, Ben Mason was pressed into service on the DL due to some injuries, and played special teams, so he probably wasn't available for the offense.  If it remains an issue I am sure we'll see something different.

I think people are talking too much about the separation and Harbaugh's influence on Gattis.  It's Gattis' offense, he's "got the keys" but if any aspect of it, not just short yardage, the entire coaching staff is going to work to find a solution, and Gattis has said as much.  Making an adjustment isn't "taking the keys away" from Gattis.  

Streetchemist

September 3rd, 2019 at 1:05 PM ^

I don't get your questioning of the failed goal line 4th and 1.  We all know Harbaugh prefers a FB to punch those in and on that play we didn't have a FB run the ball and yet you still think this was somehow a "Harbaugh influence" on the offense?

Also, why the hell do you want them pulling out "exotics" against MTSU?

Sten Carlson

September 3rd, 2019 at 6:01 PM ^

You said:

Fundamentally, the offense still looks a lot like a Harbaugh influenced one, not a predominantly Gattis influenced one.

Then you said: 

there is a lot more passing and less running plays. That's a Gattis effect. There are more read-options and run-pass-option plays and I don't think M ran a single play from under center. That's a Gattis effect.

So it's a Harbaugh-esque offense, but it did things very differently than Harbaugh does them -- and did things like how Gattis wants to do them -- but because it wasn't #SpeedInSpace to the extent that you anticipated in Game 1, you're skeptical that Harbaugh isn't still in control.  Ok, if you say so.  See my post below, but I think too many people are making too much out of whether Harbaugh still has an influence on the offense.  Of course he does.  He's the head coach.  When Gattis was asked (over and over) about Harbaugh "giving him the keys" to the offense, he said it was a collaborative effort from the entire coaching staff.  Harbaugh's isn't infected with some offensive disease that needs to be avoided.  

Drew Henson's Backup

September 3rd, 2019 at 1:24 PM ^

It didn't even go the way he said, or at least the way it was described in the OP. I didn't listen to the actual presser.

Best I can tell, Moody does FGs and Nordin does XPs.

BlueMetal

September 3rd, 2019 at 10:51 PM ^

Its confusing the way it reads but I think the jist of it is the kickers switch every three points. Moody kicked the first FG, then it was Nordins turn but that drive ended in a TD so he kicks the XP but is still up. After three consecutive XPs then they switch back. It just happens that both of Moody's drives ended in FGs. 

 

Edit: Went back and re-read OPs comments and they left out the part where Harbaugh said basically three XPs equals a FG. 

 

 

JHumich

September 3rd, 2019 at 12:27 PM ^

You know we're going to keep playing Army at least until we're leading the all-time series. I love that as an expression of ultra-competitiveness. 

And if it has to be that way, it's the perfect week to do it. Week 2, where we had a week 1 opponent that could accommodate practice for Army; then, the immediate bye week to get ready to take Wisconsin off the schedule early.

I know that there have been complaints about the scheduling, but I at the very least understand why, and can actually talk myself into seeing it as a good thing.