David Pollack: Michigan Doesn't have Enough Dynamic Offensive Weapons to Beat Alabama
This morning on Mike&Mike, David Pollack, in discussing the upcoming CFP rankings, was asked which team could theoretically beat Alabama. His reponse when it came to Michigan's chances, was that they did not have enough dynamic threats on offense to challenge Alabama. This seems like extreme SEC based logic, and sounds very much like a man who hasn't spent a lot of time watching Michigan play this year. I'm not going to say we can beat Alabama quite yet, but to say that we don't have the weapons to do so is absurd.
November 7th, 2016 at 3:48 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 7th, 2016 at 6:18 PM ^
We could very well be the best team in the country despite those negative things. No team is perfect top to bottom, not even Alabama.
November 7th, 2016 at 4:14 PM ^
Are going to own the story line until the B1G or another conference can change that on the field.
November 7th, 2016 at 4:19 PM ^
November 7th, 2016 at 4:24 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 7th, 2016 at 4:46 PM ^
Howard Cosell said a lot of things but one of the few things he did get right was the notion that games are won on the field and not over the airwaves or in columns ... "....that is why they play the games."
If it could be settled without playing they would.
November 7th, 2016 at 5:09 PM ^
What's his point? Alabama doesn't have dynamic offensive threats at all...
November 7th, 2016 at 6:54 PM ^
I commented on another thread. He said Jabrill Peppers wasn't in his top 5 for the heisman.
What an idiot. Guy shouldn't report for college football when your an idiot.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 7th, 2016 at 6:55 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 7th, 2016 at 7:21 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad