Logan88

June 3rd, 2010 at 7:28 AM ^

with Rocko Khoury as the backup Center. Last season, Moosman had to move to Center and the entire right side of the OL had to be juggled, so three different positons on the OL were affected when Molk went down.

This season, I think we would be in better shape if, God forbid, Molk were to get injured again, as we would probably only need to insert Khoury in for Molk and the rest of the OL would remain intact.

OHbornUMfan

June 3rd, 2010 at 7:35 AM ^

Stanzi as Iowa's irreplaceable player seems like a really lazy pick.  He was injured for a few games last year; remarkably, Iowa didn't collapse like Oregon without Dixon.  While Stanzi is steady, it seems that he throws at least one pick-six per game.  Not that I know much about Iowa's squad, but there has to be a position with a bigger drop-off from starter to backup than QB.

wooderson

June 3rd, 2010 at 10:32 AM ^

Agreed...while the back-up was terrible in the Northwestern game by the OSU game he was playing great and is probably a better pure passer than Stanzi.  Clayborn is much more indispensible to the Hawkeyes, he makes turns them from a respectable defense to an elite defense.

aaamichfan

June 3rd, 2010 at 8:47 AM ^

While Tolzien is a decent QB for Wisconsin, I don't see how he would be more irreplaceable than Clay. Without Clay in the backfield, Wisconson is just a middle of the road Big Ten team IMO.

Hannibal.

June 3rd, 2010 at 12:44 PM ^

Nobody in the conference is as irreplaceable as Terrelle Pryor.  He's like what Chad Henne was to Michigan in 2006.  They have basically nobody behind him.