Bunting may prove to be more difficult to overthrow than Funchess
Even with a tweeked hammy, Bunting put up a 33" vertical at the opening. Add that to his 6'6" height and he might prove a bitch for ilbs to cover, especially inside the ten. Think you might see him and another of our taller receiver, i.e., Funchess together when we're inside the ten. Pick your poison.
Quick, fix the title before someone else sees it!
Or else all the armchair English quarterbacks would be all over this.
Coming down on all of these athletes out here doing English for real.
I threw the guy a bone with a + for the post but he will likely get bombed for that. Maybe the holiday spirit will win out and people won't make a big deal about it.
and don't really give a fuck, but as a whole I would have to conclude you are the most arrogant bunch of Michigan fans found on one forum in the www. Have to believe the majority here know a whole hell of a lot more about English Comp than they do M football. Jaheezus people, if you don't like something that's written ignore it. I'm not looking for any points, be they negative or positive. Will not apologize for trying to share information I thought might not have been posted already. Inasmuch as I don't "Set on this site" like many others, I guess I'll just visit rather than attempt to contribute because all you Big Bangers seem to have that pretty well covered, although only a little of what I find interesting. My apologies and happy 4th.
Calm down Batman, there are grammar nazis in pretty much every site that allows comments.
Nope.
There needs to be a comma after calm down. Calm down, Batman. There are grammar nazis...
Well shit. It was a happy 4th indeed.
No comma needed if it is, indeed, Batman that he is to calm down.
That is a rather large, and somewhat thoughtful, paragraph for someone who refuses to contribute a fuck concerning things in which you do not understand....sir.
P.S. I accept your apology.
I saw this comment and then went back and re-read the rant and pretended that the OP was the Dawson dude crying like your avatar while typing it. Made that post 1,000x better.
Besides, accusing MGoBlog of not being big fans of Michigan Football is like going to a Justin Bieber concert and accusing all the teenyboppers of not knowing all the lyrics.
Michigan fans are generally stereotyped as an arrogant bunch. This being the the highest concentration of Michigan sports fans on the web would lead one to believe that you are correct in your assertation that MGoBlog is thus "the most arrogant bunch of Michigan fans found on one forum in the www ." So you win that round.
That being said, a lot of people here appreciate your input, hence why your post is still standing. Additionally, a lot of people (including some of those same appreciative ones), like to bust people's chops when it comes to grammar and other nitpicky things as such. It's just how forums on the internet work in general and it's mostly just in good fun. You just have to say "whatever, douchebags" to yourself, make any edits if absolutely necessary, and move on. It's when you go on the offensive by posting a long paragraph like you did saying that you don't really give a fuck that turns you into the bad guy and validates any board bullying that was going on beforehand.
I know you don't really care, but as a long timer here who's watched people like you who joined around the same time as me slowly stop contributing and eventually fall off the site due to miniscule stuff like this, I just wanted to put in my two cents. Best to just embrace and enjoy the quirks and character of the MGoBoard than to become jaded by it.
Btw - Happy 4th to you, too!
Yes, Michigan fans can be an arrogant bunch, but obviously not many of you spend a whole lot of time with fighter pilots.
Trust me...you all got nothin' on them.
The plaque for the alternates is in the ladies room
And they just never turn it off. God bless 'em, each and every one.
Good info in the original post.
Dude...
Borges' wet dream, but nightmares for opposing D-coordinators
Idiomatic usage aside, it is not okay to refer to "wet dreams" in the context of a coach-athlete relationship.
Bedsheets are the only things in danger of getting hurt by wet dreams.
I'd wait to see how Bunting is in coverage with pads on first, before jumping to conclusion based off a vertical jump.
and probably think you're cool. 6'6" with a 33 gets you to a certain vertical point. You can do the math on the rest, especially if we have an OC that employs someone on the other side of the offense that demands attention. That was my only point. When you employ one, two, possibly three of this type inside the 10 simple math dictates you have an advantage somewhere because the defense will NOT break with three defenders suited to match, and that was the point I was trying to emphasize. Many went nuts for no apparent reason and I had a great fourth......still going actually and she'll be here when I wake up.
Dont keep her in the closet, man. Women hate that.
I love it!
Appreciates taking a break from their all night monkey sex to post something on MGoBlog at 5 in the morning.
My old ones were short guys, I must make amends.
Worked hard all my lifetime, no help from spread trends.
So oh lord, won't you buy me a pair of Tight Ends.
Sorry Janis, but Al is a good guy, he deserves them.
and so too is the mirror image of you. But we're all guessing, right????
You are really winning friends today, aren't you?
He made Janis sad (but she digs Al).
He was third team in 2002.
a significant part of the passing offense. Over the years, we've very seldom employed one to a large extent other than blocking. Even Tuman didn't really catch a ton of balls. I almost think Tyler Ecker was one of the most athletic, but he always seemed to be injured. But Bunting could be an excllent one, at least if he puts on some weight.
This would have been the greatest play in college football history.