Basketball Attrition - Reasons for Hope

Submitted by AC1997 on April 10th, 2019 at 11:43 PM

The objective of this post is to offer some reasons for optimism despite the pending early departures of Jordan Poole and Iggy Brazdeikis from the basketball program.  There’s no question that the ceiling for next season just got a little lower, but I’m going to try and make a case for why the sky isn’t falling.

 

Before I do that, however, I feel the need to offer context.  I have been following Michigan basketball since I listened to the 1989 championship game as a kid in my parents’ minivan coming back from a spring break trip.  From that point until now I consider myself more likely to get worked up about early departures from the program than most people I know. After that championship game I remember being annoyed that Sean Higgins left early despite an unclear NBA future.  I enrolled at Michigan right after Chris Webber left early and was annoyed a few years later when the likes of Maurice Taylor and Olivier Saint-Jean left early.

 

In my darker moments I even rationalized many of the dreary Fisher and Ellerbe years by blaming the lack of tournament appearances on the inability to keep kids in the program. Despite the fact that most of the players were unlikely to have succeeded during that revolving door era of the program, I still wondering what might have happened if the likes of Albert White, Dominic Ingerson, Kevin Gaines, Avery Queen, and Josh Moore had been able to stay in the program.  In more recent years I got pissed at the NCAA when Jamal Crawford and Mitch McGary left and I was incredibly frustrated when Darius Morris left for the NBA without a jump shot.

 

Unlike most of those flawed former players from previous coaches, Beilein has faced a different challenge.  He has been able to develop players at such a rate that it is rare when we AREN’T coping with the early departure of a player who is off to a professional career.  Before we look ahead to next year, let’s look at what Beilein has had to deal with in the last decade:

In the last 11 years Michigan has had 18 players leave the program with eligibility remaining.  Very few of those were probably “expected” to the point where the coaches were prepared. In that same 11-year period Michigan has missed the tournament just once and that took injuries to both starting guards.  

 

Even more of a testament to Beilein’s player development is  how frequently he’s found strong contributors without having to rely on high-major transfers or top-50 recruits.  I think it is important to take note of a few late-additions who were able to make significant contributions.  In fact, I have to wonder if our opinion of the freshmen this past season would be different if one of them was forced to start even before they were ready. 

 

  • Stauskas was the #110 ranked recruit who immediately played 30mpg and left early as a lottery pick.

  • Spike was an older recruit ranked #221 and became a 4-year rotation player who shot 40 percent from three and was critical compensating for Burke foul trouble or Walton injuries.  

  • Caris was #239 and is now a rising star in the NBA and just put a fellow alum on a poster.  He was able to play limited but regular minutes as a true freshman to round out the rotation.

  • Aubrey was #396 and played significant minutes as a freshman and has had a solid college career.

  • DJ Wilson was ranked #123 and left early to become a first round pick but was afforded the ability to redshirt - a rarity under Beilein.

  • Rahk was ranked #434 and became a 4-year contributor and vital member of the team his last two seasons and was thrust into the rotation right away out of need.  Would he have cracked the rotation of this year's team with how established the top six were?  

  • Duncan Robinson transferred from Division-III and just signed a $3-million contract in the NBA.  He started as a feel-good story but quickly joined the rotation and found a role.  

  • Even guys who are thought of now as stars weren’t highly rated as recruits with Poole (#97), Wagner (#119), and Teske (#167) all being ranked well outside of the top 50.  

 

The final reason for optimism is the number of lottery tickets we have to replace Poole and Iggy.  While none of the names listed below are likely to step in right away and match their output from this past year, the fact that there are so many names means that Beilein is likely to find a combination that works:

 

Shooting Guard:  Eli Brooks, David DeJulius (in two-PG lineups), Adrian Nunez, Cole Bajema

 

Forwards:  Isaiah Livers, Brandon Johns, Jalen Wilson, Cole Bajema, and even Columbia transfer Jaron Faulds.  

 

I would expect Michigan to add at least one more wing player this off-season to add another name to that list.  Some of those players are not going to pan out - but there are enough on that list that to split up the available minutes.  While we may have had far more lofty expectations for Iggy & JP, there is no reason to panic.  John Beilein has been through this many times before.  Would anyone be surprised if Cole Bajema or Jalen Wilson is leaving early for the NBA in a couple of years?  

 

In Beilein We Trust

 

The useful websites I used to collect some of this historical info:

 

Comments

twotrueblue

April 11th, 2019 at 9:36 AM ^

Well looking at your chart, this situation is most comparable to 2014 when we also lost three guys to the NBA Draft.

The difference? We got 3 really good players in Simpson, Teske, and Livers.

Our best 3 players in 2014-2015? An often-injured LeVert, and sophomores Walton & Irvin.

Bottom line: If Simpson, Teske, and Livers are healthy, we're sitting pretty good. If not, we're beginning to look like that 2014-2015 team.

Ham

April 13th, 2019 at 1:50 AM ^

Eh, not sure I agree with you there. He without a doubt played better offensively than he had in the middle of the year, but he still wasn't playing all that well. Over Michigan's last 10 games, he averaged 12.9 minutes, shot 46/31 from the field, and had 4 assists and 3 turnovers. 

In his first 9 games of the year, he was shooting 57/43 with 16 assists and 7 turnovers. So, yes, he played better than he did in the 18-game stretch in the middle when he shot 1/14 from 3, but he still seemed to be pretty far off from where he started the year.

The Maizer

April 11th, 2019 at 11:07 AM ^

The only other year where we lost three starters early was after the 2013-2014 season and those three players were already performing at close to their ceiling (though debatable). Of the three starters we're losing this year, Poole and Iggy were expected to improve for next season, possibly dramatically.

With this in mind, understand that the disappointment people have is because of the change between what next season could have been with Brazdeikis and Poole and what it looks like without them; not comparing what next season looks like without them to Beilein's average. I don't think many people expect Michigan to be a B1G bottom dweller; the sky is not falling. But the emotional reactions are because of the disappointment that we're not likely to be title contenders when it looked like we would be.

Now I will say that your agglomeration of the information here is nice and well presented, so thanks. But I think the takeaway from what you've put together is actually that this is one of the most harmful-to-roster early exoduses that have happened in Beilein's tenure.

AC1997

April 11th, 2019 at 2:27 PM ^

I see your point, though I'm not sure I completely agree.  Stauskas was at his peak and clearly made the right decision to leave.  At the time, however, GR3 was just an athlete who couldn't create his own shot and was only 31% from 3pt range - the NBA seemed like a stretch and he ultimately ended up in the second round.  McGary probably wanted to stay based on his injury and love of college, but was pushed out by the NCAA suspension.  At the time I was upset by both of those guys leaving and I think Beilein was a bit surprised that all three left.  I think two of them we were sort of expecting to come back and reach a new level as the focus of the offense when Stauskas left.  

I do think you're right that our biggest frustration is "what might have been" next year....along with another dose of "...and yet MSU somehow keeps their guys to play for Izzo."  

The other frustration is that 3 of our 4 wing players are leaving and that was a position we had the least depth.  If Simpson had unexpectedly left we would be upset, but we know we have two PGs on the roster and another on the way.  Losing all three guys at once strains your depth, even if I'm arguing that we have a lot of bodies to throw at the problem.

The Maizer

April 11th, 2019 at 4:42 PM ^

Your points are valid, but even, so that makes this year's attrition the second worst rather than the worst, so I believe my point stands.

I do fear the habit of comparing our basketball program to MSU's every step along the way is going to be a pretty frustrating thing next season. They're likely to be a national title favorite for most of the season and the B1G will be theirs to lose. If Michigan is in a position to stand in the way of those things for (a healthy) MSU, something went very very well for us.

champswest

April 11th, 2019 at 11:24 PM ^

Well done. Thanks for doing this.

The early departures have become a way of life, especially at Michigan. We would all like to see them stay longer and accomplish more for Michigan, but it is what it is. It is great that we have a staff that can develope players, but still create an atmosphere where the individuals are free to pursue personal growth while performing within a team concept.

I wish them well in their professional lives. I eagerly look forward to seeing how Beilein fills the two openings and finding out what next year’s roster is going to look like.

Ham

April 13th, 2019 at 1:38 AM ^

the fact that there are so many names means that Beilein is likely to find a combination that works

Man, I see where you're coming from, but Beilein had a bunch of those names you listed *in addition* to Matthews, Poole, and Iggy, and he still struggled to find a combination that could consistently produce on offense.

hfhmilkman

April 13th, 2019 at 10:03 AM ^

It is not about Michigan bombing next year.  They have enough returning talent to do well.  Its just with Iggy and Poole this was a potential final four team.

fukkyt

April 13th, 2019 at 12:44 PM ^

In Belein we trust is a good motto to have.  I think the floor for next year’s team is quite high even if we lose Iggy and Poole.  We have Simpson, Teske and Livers.  One or two of the freshmen will develop into a good rotation player.  While I love Zavier Simpson, I think our upside will be capped with him as our primary offensive weapon.  We need a Stauskas/Burke/Levert who can score when the offense starts to stall. It is strange for a Beilein offense does not have a single dead eye shooter.

ohio

April 18th, 2019 at 2:13 PM ^

When you look at the history of champions since the one and done rule, it is apparent you need either really good veteran team of quality players (like Villanova, Connecticut, Duke in 2010, or Virginia) or the tournaments most outstanding player.

None of us expect Belein to start reeling in top 10 recruits. As long as these top 50 to 100 recruits keep leaving after 1 year of being all Big Ten, I just don't see us ever having a full complement of tools to break through to a title. This list you have made shows over and over that one more year out of any of these breakout players and we might have had something. Next year appears to be headed that way.

Maybe if Jalen Wilson stays for 2 and blows up in his second to be a lottery pick, a senior Livers along with our bigs and Dejulius can put us back in the final four with a shot at it all. Next years team will still be a tourney team and it is hard to complain about that. Just sucks when we've been so close (in both sports).