Your 2015 Harbaugh Staff Comment Count

Brian

WELP. You know, you schedule a thing in Cleveland right after OSU loses to Virginia Tech and you think two things: 1) OSU is definitely not going to be winning the national title that night and 2) Michigan's not going to be finalizing its assistant coaches after hiring Jim Freakin' Harbaugh. I've been playing catchup this week.

BUT ANYWAY. Your assistant coaches.

OFFENSIVE COORDINATOR/OFFENSIVE LINE

ncf_a_tim-drevno_mb_600x600[1]

TIM DREVNO. I'm mostly through his hello post. Upshot: Harbaugh vet with OC experience under him at San Diego who coached TEs and OL at Stanford (yes please) before following Harbaugh to San Francisco, where the OL's performance was highly variable. Drevno left last year to go to USC, where he had excellent results with an extremely young (as in three true freshman starters) Trojan line.

Drevno's a good fit with Harbaugh specifically and appears to be the most qualified OL coach Michigan's had in forever. USC fans were super pissed about losing him.

QUESTIONS. Is OC/OL too much for one plate? How are his recruiting chops?

SOMEWHAT UNFAIR GRADE. A-. Lack of big-time OC experience the one drawback; tons to offset that.

RUNNING BACKS

TYRONE WHEATLEY. You know Wheat. Even if you are a pup, there is Wolverine Historian for you. Michigan legend, quick-riser once he hung up the spurs, driven to be a head coach. Should be a killer recruiter and guy who tells guys to run at the holes.

QUESTIONS. Is there enough of a difference in RB coaches to matter, or is vision un-salvageable?

SOMEWHAT UNFAIR GRADE. A. Excellent trajectory, is Ty Freaking Wheately.

WIDE RECEIVERS

011311-NFL-Seahawks-Jedd-Fisch-PI_20110113141821167_660_320[1]

JEDD FISCH. Former OC at Minnesota, Miami, and with the Jaguars was dumped after two years in Jacksonville during which he was provided not much talent and a ton of rookies. Two-year tenure at Miami was highly encouraging, featuring a big turnaround from Jacory Harris and the development of pretty-good Stephen Morris.

Fisch's WR experience is somewhat limited. He didn't play football and hasn't had a WR job since 2008.

QUESTIONS. What exactly will he do as a passing coordinator? How much does his relative lack of WR background hurt?

SOMEWHAT UNFAIR GRADE. B+. Recruiting questions due to his relatively short tenure in college, awkward fit at WR, but also a position coach who is 38 with 5 years of OC experience behind him.

TIGHT ENDS

KIM-JAY[1]

woo! suck it, dad! via MGoVideo

JAY HARBAUGH, son of Jim. Yeah, nepotism hire. The younger Harbaugh at least resisted the call when it was offered to him earlier:

With a coaching vacancy to fill this offseason, 49ers coach Jim Harbaugh zeroed in on a promising young member of his brother John's Baltimore Ravens staff. John reluctantly granted permission, and Jim proceeded to woo the up-and-comer.

But his pitch wasn't good enough -- not this time, at least.

"It's a dream to one day work for my dad, and hopefully the opportunity will come," said Harbaugh's son, Jay. "He understood where I was coming from."

Jay is the first Michigan coach who's appallingly younger than me—25—and should have Michigan on the cutting edge of the Facebooks and Instagrams and swipe-right-to-commit websites; he necessarily has zero track record.

I'd rather have a guy with one of those, but if that's the cost of Harbaugh whatever man. Also, let's look back that the Harbaugh coaching tree… okay. I mean:

"One time, I asked, 'Do guys give you a hard time about working for your uncle, automatically look at that as the reason you got the job?' His response was: 'It's my responsibility to not give them the opportunity to confirm that suspicion.'"

QUESTIONS. Is he actually a good coach? Will having a 25-year-old on staff help with the insta-twitter-snap-tinder-cruiting?

SOMEWHAT UNFAIR GRADE. C. Zero track record. Shades of JayPa, but Harbaugh isn't the OC. Harbaugh name rescues it—there is obviously a heritage there.

DEFENSIVE COORDINATOR/LINEBACKERS

HWPQEWOQMTVDJNN.20131113183704[1]

DJ DURKIN. Mattison/Harbaugh/Muschamp protégé has experienced meteoric rise in the coaching profession, to the point where he's taking his second DC job at a prestige program at the tender age of 37. (It's his birthday. Happy birthday.) Called plays for Florida's kickass D the past two years, has three years of Harbaugh experience as the DE coach at Stanford.

Should be a dynamic recruiter both in Florida, where he has four years of experience, and in Ohio, where he grew up and played college football at Bowling Green. Was pursued heavily by A&M and UNC, the former of which "settled" for throwing a walrus of money at LSU DC John Chavis.

QUESTIONS. How much of the Florida D was Muschamp and how much was him? How long will he stick around before getting a head coach gig? Does he know Mike Judge and can he get him my movie script?

SOMEWHAT UNFAIR GRADE. A. An up-and-comer with a terrific track record who immediately piqued the interest of a half-dozen recruits in SEC territory when he took the job.

DEFENSIVE LINE

6196187473_8eee53333e_z

[Eric Upchurch]

GREG MATTISON. Michigan retained its DC as a position coach, and he was pretty good to excellent as  defensive coordinator. Also, he's regarded as a terrific recruiter and provides continuity to help ease transition costs and prevent too many transfers. Pretty pretty good. Good fit, as well—Mattison's known various Harbaughs for 40 years and had Durkin as a GA when both were at Notre Dame. He's not going to butt heads with Michigan's new DC, but rather help him ease into being the man in charge of his own D.

Yeah, he's expensive for a position coach, but that contract was already signed.

QUESTIONS. How long does he stick around?

SOMEWHAT UNFAIR GRADE. A. Or five swag Mattisons.

CORNERBACKS(?)

MIKE ZORDICH. Twelve-year NFL vet has a decade-long coaching career that is mostly on lower levels save for a short stint with the Eagles. Should know everything about coverages given playing experience; Youngstown dude who went to Penn State should be able to hit Ohio and Pittsburgh hard.

QUESTIONS. Can he recruit at a big-time level? What happened with Philly and why did he get stuck at YSU?

SOMEWHAT UNFAIR GRADE: B-. NFL pedigree is nice, track record lacking, does bring a presumed set of recruiting chops that should be highly useful in PA.

SAFETIES

635568479949566418-Untitled-1[1]

GREG JACKSON. Another guy with a decade-plus career as an NFL safety; hooked on with Harbaugh after a few years at small schools and one at Wisconsin, whereupon his DBs were statistically lights-out. LSU alum who will likely focus on recruiting the south.

QUESTIONS. Was he a driving force behind the kickass 49ers DBs or was that either a statistical fluke or just a fortunate confluence of talent? Can he overcome the extreme gravitational pull of the South—and especially Louisiana—in recruiting?

SOMEWHAT UNFAIR GRADE: A-. Track record a little short, but dang man.

SPECIAL TEAMS

JOHN BAXTER. Thirteen-year career at Fresno State saw Bulldogs block a stunning 84 punts and kicks and return a bunch of the unblocked ones for touchdowns; upon his hire at USC was an immediate success with the Trojans. Left out after Kiffin firing when Sarkisian brought in his own guys, took a year off, was pursued by Texas and Pac-12 schools this time around and chose Michigan.

Also has 15 years of experience as an associate head coach and touts his "Academic Gameplan," which helped drag Fresno State out of the depths of schoolwork purgatory.

QUESTIONS. Spread punts?!?!?!?! (Yes.) How's his recruiting?

SOMEWHAT UNFAIR GRADE. A. Should be a massive upgrade on Michigan's dismal Hoke-era special teams.

A BRIEF COMPARISON TO THE PREVIOUS STAFF(s)

As in how good of an idea they seemed like when hired, not now. Otherwise these grades would be worse.

Borges: C. Had been out of football, not much success since first year at Auburn. Did have a good year with Lindley in second year at SDSU.
Doug Nussmeier. B+. Pretty clear he was getting chased from 'Bama so Lane Kiffin could enter, but a guy with an impressive track record who's still respected enough to get the Florida OC job even after last year.

Fred Jackson: C. Had been losing his fastball for a while. In-state recruiting successes offset by wildly inaccurate talent evaluations, and how hard is it for Michigan to recruit in-state anyway?
Jeff Hecklinski: B. Long time Hoke assistant did do a nice job with SDSU WRs, both of whom went in the third round after Heck's departure for M.
Darrell Funk: C. Pre-Hoke experience topped out as OL coach at Colorado State. Seemed plausible as an up-and-comer.
Dan Ferrigno: D. Had bombed out of college coaching in 2008 and was back in HS when Hoke picked him up; aging; no thought of upward mobility.

Greg Mattison: A. Big time college coordinator coming straight from the NFL.

Jerry Montgomery. B. Iowa alum and up-and-comer who Michigan yoinked away from Indiana mere weeks after he agreed to move there. Trajectory was borne out when Oklahoma came in with a big offer and stole him away.
Mark Smith: D. Had been with Hoke forever after moving from Indiana State, failed DC at Ball State, no track record of success recruiting or coaching. Also no thought of upward mobility.
Roy Manning (CB): C. Awkward fit in secondary, but young go-getter good on the trail. Would have been a grade higher if left in the defensive front seven.
Curt Mallory: C. Longtime DBs coach who had bounced around the Big Ten for a while; was coming off three years as Illinois co-DC and one as Akron's DC, albeit with little success.

----------------------------

All you have to do to measure relative attractiveness of Hoke's last staff is where they're landing. Borges and Ferrigno are supposedly headed to San Jose State; Jackson retired; Mallory went to Wyoming. Nussmeier is the exception, and he was only around for one year. Nobody else has an announced destination yet, and it's hard to see anyone other than Manning and Hecklinski getting a good Power 5 job—and even that's somewhat doubtful.

Notably, the biggest jobs many of Hoke's assistants had before coming into Hoke's orbit were not real big. A hypothetical Hoke-Harbaugh "impressive job not related to you or Michigan" challenge starts out with a couple of pushes and then is a blowout:

HOKE COACH PRIOR CEILING HARBAUGH COACH PRIOR CEILING
Mattison Ravens DC Mattison Ravens DC
Borges Auburn OC Durkin Florida DC
Hecklinski Arizona QB/pass game Fisch Jaguars OC
Mallory Illinois co-DC Drevno USC OL/run game
Ferrigno Oregon WR G. Jackson Wisconsin DB
Smith Indiana State DC Baxter USC ST
F. Jackson Vandy RB Zordich Eagles DB
Funk Colorado State OL Wheatley Bills RB
Manning Cincinnati RB Harbaugh Ravens QC

[Fred Jackson is a weird outlier, admittedly.]

Calibrate your preference between Borges and Durkin as you will; to me there's no question which guy I'd rather have at the time they were hired. Ditto Ferrigno versus Jackson since Jackson had been very impressive with Harbaugh. And this staff is very, very young. By my reckoning everyone on it save Baxter, Zordich, and Mattison is hungry to move up—and capable of doing so. I'm not sure you could say that about anyone on Hoke's staff.

Hooray, then? I think so.

Comments

Brodie

January 16th, 2015 at 2:11 AM ^

TE coaches tend to do very little actual coaching. Jay Harbaugh is here to be young, talk about young people shit with recruits, flash his Super Bowl ring from time to time and praise a kid's hustle here and there.

And, really... these kinds of things are a mixed bag. There are plenty of Tommy Bowdens in the world to go with all the Steve Spurrier Jrs.

Real Tackles Wear 77

January 15th, 2015 at 2:15 PM ^

Will Mattison be the nation's highest paid position coach this year (who isn't also a HC/DC/OC)? Gotta be up there, though this is certainly a one-in-a-million situation. I figure there are a lot of future head coaches on our staff now (Wheatley, Drevno, Durkin, maybe Harbaugh Jr. in 20 years) and maybe when Ty is ready for the next step in 3/4 years we see Mike Hart (another future HC) get brought back in.

turd ferguson

January 15th, 2015 at 2:23 PM ^

In general, I'd evaluate them similarly, though I'm quite a bit higher on Zordich (I'd give that an A-/B+) and lower on Jay Harbaugh (I'd give that a D/D-). 

In Zordich's case, he's originally from Youngstown (birth & high school, at least), and I'm sure he had other opportunities after coaching for the Eagles but preferred to go home to YSU.  I have a feeling he'll be one of our best recruiters and better position coaches.

gwkrlghl

January 15th, 2015 at 2:35 PM ^

I'd have been happy with someone who got 11 guys on the field and understands what a spread punt is. We got a guy who is not just competent but appears to be great. ST doesn't seem like a big deal, but a blocked punt here and a solid kick return there is the difference between losing a few close games and winning a few close games

jackw8542

January 15th, 2015 at 2:47 PM ^

I am ecstatic with the coaching staff as a whole but am much more sanguine with Jay Harbaugh than most posters seem to be.  His dad wanted him to come to SF last year, and Jay turned it down, so Jim obviously thought his son had the necessary skills at that time.  It is highly unlikely, even if judging only from that limited information, either that Jim Harbaugh would bring his son aboard if he had any doubt that he could do the job or that Jay would have taken the job if he had any doubt that he could do the job.  The folks so eager to cast aspersions on that hire need to take a chill pill.

umumum

January 15th, 2015 at 3:23 PM ^

Almost more than demonstrating the strength of our new coaching staff, this comparison shows how weak/C level the previous one was.  No wonder few players were coached up.  

As Hoke attempted a managerial style of head coaching, he failed before he even figuratively stepped by campus by hiring under-qualified assistants.  The perceived "home run" hiring of Mattison masked the weakness of the others.

kehnonymous

January 15th, 2015 at 3:26 PM ^

It's certainly understandable why we'd side-eye the hire of Jay Harbaugh given the total lack of track record and that Michigan is as big-league as it gets - but to his credit no one is more aware of that than Jay himself.   Jay might very well not work out in his position.. but if he doesn't it sure as shit won't be because his dad cut him a lot of slack and glossed over his shortcomings. ....because you know, when we think Jim Harbaugh, I'm sure that "lack of intensity" and "putting on kid gloves" are the first things that coming to mind.

WolverineHistorian

January 15th, 2015 at 3:25 PM ^

Before the whole Sandusky saga broke at Penn State, I remember their fans publicly complaining about Jay Paterno being a horrible offensive coach and only having the job because his daddy was the head coach. It seems many of our fans have the same fear about Harbaugh's son....who coincidentally is also named Jay.

NittanyFan

January 15th, 2015 at 6:33 PM ^

I don't think this is a bad hire for Michigan.  He may turn out to be a very good coach.  And if he isn't --- well, it honestly probably doesn't matter as much as it could.  He's "only" the TE coach, not the OC.

 

I do think that regardless of whether Jay Harbaugh turns out to be very very very good or very very very bad: Jay Harbaugh should definitely "spread his wings" and try something different in ~ 3-4 years.  

 

Point being: don't become inbred.  More than anything else, that was JayPa's problem.  If you spend all your time at one school coaching under 1 HC, it's not surprising if you evolve into a predictable and un-innovative coach.

 

Anyway, I'd grade the hire a "C+, with more upside potential vs. downside risk."

BlueMan80

January 15th, 2015 at 4:10 PM ^

This staff should have the stuff required to compete with OSU who are the benchmark for the B1G and have been for many years.  You want excellence, you need to put the people in place to deliver excellence.  So, yeah Garth, excellent!

Not expecting miracles on Day 1, but feel confident this group of coaches have what it takes to get Michigan back to the top of the mountain.  Had no faith that the previous staff could ever do that as demonstrated by the comparison.

ShariaLawFan

January 15th, 2015 at 5:01 PM ^

No delicate way to say this: we didn't exactly 'Rooney Rule' these hires, or whatever.  S&C meathead aside, 2/9 coaches doesn't align with a team that will be 3/4 black.  Any legitimacy to this 'devil's advocate' spin on the staff?  Total non-factor?  Mods ban this chucklehead?

pete-rock

January 15th, 2015 at 5:02 PM ^

The previous coaching staff graded out at a 2.30 gpa using Brian's grades, with only one (Mattison) getting an A.  The Harbaugh staff grades out at a 3.49 gpa with four A's (Wheatley, Durkin, Mattison and Baxter) and two A-minuses (Drevno, Jackson)

I hope Brian's not inflating grades, because that's a pretty big jump that should show dividends on the field immediately.

Mr. Yost

January 15th, 2015 at 7:26 PM ^

Jim Harbaugh: A

Drevno: B (lack of serious OC experience worries me, can't compare to someone like Herman who just left OSU).

Wheatley: A/A+ (not saying he's a better coach than Harbaugh, just saying for being a RB coach...I don't think we can do better. Meyer and Saban keep Harbaugh from A+, I think Wheatley is instantly up there with anyone in the country).

Fisch: C (downgrade from Hecklinski, IMO - he was the best coach on our staff along with Mattison. He's been an OC, but not really sucessfully. Some questions about his relationship with young players in Jacksonville. Not impressed at the moment, but things can change).

Jay Harbaugh: I (right now he's probably a D-, but because we literally no nothing about him, I'll put him as an I. My fear is that coaches can easily negative recruit against him until he gets 5 years experience under his belt. Not impressed at the moment. Should get a lot of help from Baxter).

DJ Durkin: A (We got Mattison on the back end his career, I feel like Durkin is Mattison on the FRONT end of his career...AND he gets to work with MATTISON. Couldn't be a better combo. Huge hire).

Greg Mattison: A (See Durkin. We now have one of the best DL coaches in the country AND he gets to help groom the DC a little more. Couldn't be a better combo. Huge hire).

Mike Zordich: B- (Nice name for NE Ohio and PA, experience isn't anything special, but like it better than Fisch. At least he's coached the position he's coaching pretty much all his career).

Greg Jackson: B+ (Experience is lacking, but has done a solid job in the experience he's had...can't knock him. I could see him as a Vance Bedford in the making).

John Baxter: A/A- (*inhales deeply* ...aaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh)

Mr. Yost

January 15th, 2015 at 9:31 PM ^

Hoke: B-
Borges: B
Jackson: B-/C+
Hecklinski: B-/C+ (would've been seriously wrong on him)
Ferrigno: C-/D+
Funk: C
Mattison: A+
Montgomery: B
Smith: D+
Mallory: B
-------------------
Manning: B-
Nussmeier: A-

................NOW THAT I KNOW WHAT I KNOW................

Hoke: D+
Borges: C+
Jackson: D+
Hecklinski: A-
Ferrigno: D
Funk: D
Mattison: A- (as a DC, better as a DL coach)
Montgomery: A-/B+ when he left Michigan (A/A- now)
Smith: C
Mallory: C+
-------------------
Manning: B (but a rising star)
Nussmeier: B

................FINAL THOUGHTS................

When you look back at that staff...only Hecklinski, Manning, Montgomery and Nussmeier actually had upward trajectory careers at the beginning. Maybe it's a coincidence that all 3 guys who were better than I originally thought had that in common. Hard to say Nussmeier wouldn't have lived up to his A- if he would've been here longer than a year.

Mallory felt like a lifetime DB coach, neither up nor down. Funk probably belongs in that "steady" category too. Everyone else was washed up, over the hill or uninspiring. 

That's AWFUL. That's 4 of 10 guys that are looking to do better, be better. Guys that are inspired to do more so they can move up in their careers.

I look at this staff. Mattison is the only guy on the back end, but as a DL coach...that's great. Jim Harbaugh, Baxter and Zordich are in that "steady" catagory. Everyone else could easily move up in his career.

When I compare staff versus staff...if you ask me today, I'd take Hecklinski over Fisch and Zordich and Manning (at CB coach, not OLB/DE coach) is a push, IMO. Jay Harbaugh vs. Ferrigno is a push today, but I'd bet Jay ends up being the better TE coach option after 4 years here. Everything else is clearly in Harbaugh's corner and some aren't even close.

Indiana Blue

January 16th, 2015 at 9:19 AM ^

You "rating" these coaches is just absolutely WORTHLESS.  Everyone on planet earth knows the Harbaugh hire was a phenomenal accomplishment !  Why don't you step away from the keyboard and let Michigan's Head Coach make those decisions without your evaluations.  Seriously you are giving out letter grades on a staff based upon your very close and intimate knowledge of .... well, what is YOUR intimate knowledge how Jim Harbaugh works with his staff ?

I am usually a huge "fan" of your posts ... but this one fails on every single level.  Sorry - just the fact.

Go Blue!

Mr. Yost

January 16th, 2015 at 10:21 AM ^

Brian gave his in the OP. You can do the same.

What the fuck are you talking about? That's literally the point of a blog. To share your opinion.

Some times you're right, some times you're wrong.

I didn't claim this as fact, but how could you even confuse it as fact? That's just silly on your part. There is literally no way you could read either post and think "that's fact or he thinks that's fact."

There is no way for ANYONE, not even Jim Harbaugh to give grades and they be presented as fact versus Jim's opinion. Obviously his opinion matters more than mine, yours, etc. --- but it would still just be his opinion.

So don't say "sorry - just a fact" when your fact is based on nothing. You basically just said "sorry, it's a fact that your opinion, presented as opinion is an opinion." Well, no shit.

Parkinen

January 15th, 2015 at 7:46 PM ^

Some of this may be about money. He most likely doesn't have an open check book and Mattison, for a position coach is costing him a bundle. Hacket probably told him you have x dollars to spend. Which in part explains the hires of a Jay and Fisch, who are probably bargains bringing him in on budget for the whole package.

AnthonyThomas

January 15th, 2015 at 10:47 PM ^

Mattison would've had to have been paid regardless. So they're actually saving money by keeping him on staff. 

Two generations of Harbaughs have turned out to be great coaches. Is it really that hard to believe that Jack and John and Jim see Jay as a natural? Surely they've discussed it. Jim is ruthlessly committed to winning. He wouldn't hire anyone who might hurt his chances of winning, even his own son. 

Durham Blue

January 15th, 2015 at 8:42 PM ^

I was a student at Michigan when Wheatley was there.  And I loved the Wheatley tribute video but damn I hated the black and white looking Northwestern video.  That shit makes me feel OLD.

champswest

January 15th, 2015 at 8:50 PM ^

A perceived advantage for recruiting a particular region of the country. I was under the impression (from a previous post) that this staff would be expected to recruit their respective positions. Is this a contradiction or do we even know yet how recruiting will be organized.

HANCOCK

January 15th, 2015 at 10:25 PM ^

Maybe Im being impacted by the bias of watching the 2013 offense, but I think it is very generous to Borges to say he is a push with Durkin. I dont remember being very excited about him being hired. It was more of an "Ehh..." reaction.

 

I also think Montgomery deserves/deserved at least a B+. I thought he was a large part of our success along the D-Line in 2011. He also seemed like a good recruiter and went on to a good job at Oklahoma. I was genuinely upset when we lost him. 

uminks

January 16th, 2015 at 2:49 AM ^

A huge coaching upgrade! Hopefully, Hoke's good recruiting class of 2012 can still be coached up. I know all of Harbaugh's classes will be coached up!