we don't have photos this year so here's john shuster (for a good reason! at least an okay one!)

Wondering If The Fire Is Still Hot Comment Count

Brian November 23rd, 2020 at 1:02 PM

11/21/2020 – Michigan 48, Rutgers 42 (3OT) – 2-3 Big Ten

If there's one thing I've tried to incorporate into my brain over the course of writing about sports it's this: performances are not consistent.

Over a relatively long span of time a player can be expected to do X. Over shorter spans a player can wildly exceed or underperform his true level. And "shorter spans" can be astoundingly long, from the perspective of someone drawing meaning from a single game. The best example I can throw at you now is Strauss Mann, who has ~120 games of .930+ goaltending bookending a brief season-long disaster:

image

Mann also had 14 USHL playoff games at .932 for people double-checking the ~120

In basketball, Tim Hardaway Jr is a career 35% three-point shooter in the NBA. At Michigan his performance there went 37%, 28%, 37%. Duncan Robinson has a solid case for the best shooter on the planet in the Year of Our Lord 2020; through the first 10 games of his senior season he was shooting 30% from deep and everyone was writing him off.

You want curling examples? I've got curling examples. USA Curling more or less explicitly told John Shuster to die in a fire after finishing 10th and 11th out of 12 in consecutive Olympics. Shuster cobbled together a crew of ne'er do wells, won the national championship repeatedly, and then won an Olympic gold medal.

Football? Let me google some details about this obscure sport. [typing sounds] …interesting… [more typing] …it's like rugby except discrete… well. Let me show you some idiot talking about a Foot-Ball Quarter-Back replacing the starter mid-game during a year of worry and discontent:

Basic stuff... that felt like a revelation. O'Korn's quick, open throws stood in contrast to Speight's struggles to identify open guys the last few games. Twice Michigan picked up catch-and-run conversions on outs that had to be thrown with accuracy and timing to provide YAC. They were. Ditto Gentry's mesh touchdown, which O'Korn knew was open before he even turned around off of play action. This is basic quarterbacking being executed very well. That's huge progress for O'Korn, and apparently the offense.

And then he got dialed in. I gave him 6 DOs in this game, which is a lot on just 26 throws, and I shorted him one on his scramble escapades. The others were no-doubters. This throw is not only between two guys in a tight window but leads Gentry upfield and cannot be better placed for a catch and run:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wd7-D0sd9bE&feature=emb_logo

One 15 yard penalty later, Michigan faces first and 25 with Purdue breathing down O'Korn's neck. O'Korn stands in, takes the hit, and gives Gentry a chance to make a play.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moYO8YubAYw&feature=emb_logo

1) Yes, throw it at the Ent. 2) He even puts this outside of the defender. Given the circumstances this about as good as it gets.

O'Korn leapt off the bench in relief of an injured Wilton Speight, completing 18/26 passes for 10.4 YPA, was the future of the position for one (1) week, and was thereafter a small child lost in a department store. Bet you wish I stuck with the curling examples.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Now we must consider Cade McNamara. McNamara came off the bench, sparked the offense, and led Michigan to a win. He was calm; he sprinkled in some tough throws in the face of pressure. He looked pretty good. I think we should hold off on expectations that he will continue being pretty good until we see some more. Let's play Pick The Box Score Against Rutgers:

  1. 31/43, 319 yards, 7.4 YPA
  2. 27/36, 260 yards, 7.2 YPA

Door #2 is McNamara. Door #1? Rocky Lombardi. (Lombardi did have two interceptions. One was his WR running the wrong route; the second was Lombardi forcing the ball in desperation mode.) Rutgers may not be very good at football.

To be explicitly clear, this is also what I was advocating after the Minnesota game:

Now tell me about Milton. Be EFFUSIVE.

First I want to pump the brakes

I TOLD YOU TO BE EFFUSIVE

This was a beautiful way to break in a new quarterback against a team that didn't really know what was coming and the number of different things Michigan asked him to do was relatively limited. We don't know how good he is at throws that aren't screens and wide open slants/posts across the middle.

Post snap reads were minimal. These days it's extremely hard to tell if something is a genuine RPO or a called pass …there weren't even many opportunities to puzzle about it. They kept it simple.

Michigan never put in any reads, presumably because Milton wouldn't execute them consistently. Maybe McNamara can. Maybe he's the answer. But expecting QB3 to suddenly blow up when the rest of the program is in the shape it's in… well, it's optimistic. We literally just did this. Water status: holding.

[After THE JUMP: we soldier on]

 

AWARDS

Known Friends and Trusted Agents Of The Week

you're the man now, dog

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]#1 Cade McNamara. See above. Did lead Michigan to all of their points, give or take some special teams adventures.

#2 Hassan Haskins. Grabbed hold of the RB1 job in the second half by grinding out tough yards in unlikely situations. 25 carries(!) seems like an impossible number given the way things have gone thus far this season. 4.4 YPC against Rutgers doesn't sound amazing. Unfortunately, it kind of is.

#3 Giles Jackson. The foremost amongst Michigan receivers because he did not fumble one, as Johnson did, and also chipped in a kick return touchdown. Had one tough back shoulder opportunity he did not bring in but otherwise very good. Needs more touches.

Honorable mentions: I'm dubious anyone on defense qualifies. Johnson does despite the fumble thanks to the sell-job he put on the safety for the wide-open TD; Bell caught a few passes and had some critical blocks that were either on screens or not technically OPI.

KFaTAotW Standings. (Scoring: 8 points for first, 5 for second, 3 for third, 1 for HM. Points from ties adjudicated by an ankylosaur named Sharon.)

14: Joe Milton (#1 Minnesota, #3 MSU, #3 Indiana)
11: Giles Jackson(#1 MSU, #3 Rutgers)
10: Dax Hill (#2 MSU, #2 Indiana), Ronnie Bell (HM Minnesota, #1 Indiana, HM Rutgers)
8: Cade McNamara(#1 Rutgers)
7: Hassan Haskins(HM Minnesota, HM MSU, #2 Rutgers)
5: Kwity Paye(T2 Minnesota, HM MSU, HM Indiana)
3: Aidan Hutchinson(T2 Minnesota), Michael Barrett(#3 Minnesota)
2: Cornelius Johnson(HM Indiana, HM Rutgers)
1: Ben Mason (HM Minnesota), Jaylen Mayfield (HM Minnesota), Roman Wilson (HM MSU), Brad Robbins(HM Indiana),

Who's Got It Better Than Us(?) Of The Week

Michigan intercepting Rutgers on fourth down to win a triple overtime game. Wait, come back!

Honorable mention: Johnson torching a Rutgers DB and McNamara hitting him; the untouched Jackson return; the semblance of a run game.

image?MARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

Rutgers getting to overtime when their stick QB dragged multiple Michigan defenders into the endzone.

Honorable mention: All field goals; the fourth-down TD to set up the two point conversion; playing with no free safety against a post

OFFENSE

Changing what you call. I'll get into this in more detail but McNamara's entry coincided with a change in playcalling. Michigan ran a lot more quick stuff to the outside and found a ground game. With limited exceptions it didn't seem like the QB switch enabled those changes. (McNamara scoring a short touchdown on a bonafide zone read stands out as an exception.) The QB certainly benefited from them.

Haskins finds the cutbacks. McNamara also benefited from the Michigan ground game ceasing to be nonexistent. First half rush yards: 33. Second half: 129. Much of this was Hassan Haskins finding himself surrounded in the backfield and squeezing through cutback lanes while batting away arm tackles. Other parts were bonafide RPS+ plays, like a counter trap:

That may be the first time since the Minnesota game that Michigan got rushing yards based on play design.

And then things get put together. Michigan followed that up with a little pop pass for a TD:

These are not opportunities afforded to you when you can't run the ball one iota.

Imprecision, eventual improvement. Michigan's pick game has been weak all year, with missed opportunities early in this one. Things did get a better. Bell executed a perfect pick on a slant touchdown where he located a defender and turned around, butt out, to eliminate him.

Then he jumped up and down like Pat Fitzgerald about it. So we value these improvements.

It happened! Chris Evans. Split wide. Gets a linebacker.

Michigan borfs the pick route(see above) and Evans still barely gets touched by that linebacker. I can now fade into oblivion. It took five years, but it happened. o

DEFENSE

Also in performances are not consistent. Ye gods, Dax Hill had a disaster. He was directly responsible for both of Rutgers's longest pass plays. On the first he tried to catch an arm-punt in his chest instead of high-pointing the ball or running through the wide receiver.

go get the ball

On the second he was Bartleby the Free Safety: asked to play the deep middle against a post he said he would prefer not to. He also got victimized on the Vedral completion from the sideline. He did do better at high-pointing the ball on the final snap.

It is notable that almost all previous Dax Hill events have been Hill in man coverage and not Hill trying to play a deep zone. This doesn't mean that he's incapable of doing so—when you play a deep zone correctly the ball generally does not get thrown at you. But yeesh.

Various walk-ons. Michigan played Jess Speight at DT, Adam Shibley at LB, and Hunter Reynolds at safety. All acquitted themselves fairly well. It's still a major issue that Michigan's top backups at DT, LB, and S are walk-ons because this team has almost no experienced depth. The only scholarship backup linebackers are true freshmen. It's not quite as raided at safety, but the only non-true freshman scholarship backup options there are German Green and Quinten Johnson, who is coming off a serious injury and may as well be a true freshman.

I don't have to tell anyone that Michigan's roster management has been a disaster, but here's the latest manifestation of it.

Reynolds did a thing. He got over the top of a slot fade to Bo Melton.

This has not happened in a long time. You can only get over the top of route on the edge of the field if you cheat to it; that's what Reynolds did. Since the color guy was saying "this is going to be a slot fade to Bo Melton" and I was thinking "oh man this is going to be a slot fade to Bo Melton" this wasn't the most out-there thing to anticipate. Still nice to see a safety make a play over the top.

Now it's slants. Rutgers's tying drive was a boatload of slants on which almost every member of the secondary got beaten so badly there was no contest on the catch. Green, Gray, and Hill all gave up first downs on third and long. Not great.

Not even mad about this one though. Rutgers's tribute to Vincent Smith could not have been better executed.

If that ball doesn't force the running back to catch it while going flat out Michigan likely tackles that in the backfield.

SPECIAL TEAMS

image

Well, he is fast. Giles Jackson had the world's easiest kick return touchdown. He caught the ball on the five, angled towards the sideline, and then ran straight. This is as close as you're ever going to get to a 100-meter dash in football pads and Jackson crossed the goal line at 14:50.

Maybe make some field goals? This is my advice. Kick it through, not around.

MISCELLANEOUS

A horrible spot. FWIW, the fourth and one attempt where Milton was ruled down was a preposterous spot. He easily made the 42. I can't complain that Michigan didn't challenge that, because they literally never overturn spots that aren't on the goal line.

The usual clock management. Michigan's two-minute drill:

This is a full-on Dead Dove Do Not Eat situation. Michigan ran four plays in the first 90 seconds of their two minute drill. This is never changing.

Frames Janklin of the week. Greg Schiano had a third and ten on his twenty five in OT; field goal wins it. So he has his quarterback kneel down for a two yard loss so he can center the ball. The ensuing field goal fades wide. 1) If it was kicked from the right hash it's good. 2) If the field goal is five yards closer because you ran for three yards on third down, it's good.

I'm supposed to have a joke about this or something but instead I can only gape at it.

Comments

Durham Blue

November 24th, 2020 at 8:11 PM ^

Your summary puts my "eye test" of McNamara nicely into words.  The offense finally has some rhythm and some flow with him at QB.  We saw glimpses of speed in space with Shea last season but it was never consistent.  It is still a very small sample size but I am longing to see a lot more Cade at QB.

wile_e8

November 23rd, 2020 at 1:41 PM ^

RE: Changing the calls

I have a hard time believing that it's entirely on the play calling if the offense goes from several weeks of a jumbled mess with no post-snap reads to something coherent that takes advantage of what the defense is giving you with occasional post-snap reads the minute you switch quarterbacks. At least some of that has to be on McNamara being better at making the reads then Milton.

Which isn't to bag on Milton, who was always supposed to be a raw physical specimen that would take years to learn how to run an offense. He's still a redshirt sophomore, I think he can figure it out before his time is done. But we're in year 6 of the Harbaugh regime and it's on them for one reason or another if they think their best QB option is someone that can't make the reads necessary to run a modern offense. 

bronxblue

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:15 PM ^

I really do think something happened with McCaffrey late that messed up this staff offensively.  Like, I know there was some hype in the offseason about Milton looking good but it seemed like everyone sort of agreed it was "Milton is making a game of it and shows potential, but it's Dylan's spot for now".  And McCaffrey was at the rally to re-start play only a couple weeks before the season started; if he really had lost his starting spot as emphatically as some said and wasn't interested in returning I have no idea why he'd be there.  So I wonder if the coaches figured Milton had shown the most potential and were going to run with him but it was as much a "we've got two options right now and that's it" situation.  

I guess I remember that game with O'Korn different than others.  I thought he looked best specifically because he was running around, escaping pockets, and improvising.  McNamara largely didn't do that; he ran the version of the offense people sort of expected to see.  I think Milton has a lot of potential but he came to UM a raw QB with a massive arm, questionable accuracy, and average athleticism.  I fully expect hm to improve but much like how the offense at the end of 2018 looked really solid and then Patterson seemingly "forgot" how to run read options in 2019, sometimes guys fail to run the plays as designed and so plays blow up.  

I don't think McNamara is going to turn into an elite QB god these next couple of weeks, but there's no reason he can't be a league-average, competent QB who has a lot of weapons around him.  That's a pretty good offense if you can get it.

wile_e8

November 23rd, 2020 at 3:55 PM ^

FWIW When I'm saying it's on the coaches one way or another, I think Brandon Peters has to be mentioned too. Whatever happened to McCaffrey (and it does seem really weird now), it would have been nice to have a RS Senior around as an option. And he was recruited and coached totally by this staff, so whatever went wrong there is at least partially on them too. And sometimes staffs make mistakes, but this is yet another one on the pile of staff mistakes everywhere. 

CompleteLunacy

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:15 PM ^

I actually am less inclined to think Milton will figure it out. I don't dismiss it entirely...but he's in his 3rd year with the program and he looked like a timid freshman against IU, Wisconsin, and Rutgers. Whether the playbook is limited or not with him, it sure at least feels like it. And if he has bad accuracy with downfield throws, can't seem to consistently hit the automatic short-throws, can't make the zone and RPO-type reads consistently, and doesn't really have a very good pocket presence and in-game awareness...then what, exactly, does he bring to the table? Arm strength is the most overrated QB characteristic imaginable. It can also be a detriment if your WR can't even catch the "easy" throws because you just zipped a ball too hard at them. 

Maybe in a different year where he could grow into the role while the team around him picks up the slack it could work, but this team is a tire fire on defense and has just as many new starters on offense (particularly the youth at OL)...it's just not a great environment for a raw athletic project at QB. Which is unfortunate, because even if Milton could still grow we just may never see it. 

TrueBlue2003

November 23rd, 2020 at 5:14 PM ^

Yeah, Brian is saying the playcalling didn't change but it looked like far more of what they were doing had an option.  Not just the read option for TD but most pass plays looked like RPOs (the pop pass included) to me.  It absolutely feels in retrospect like the coaches weren't calling those plays because Milton couldn't make the right reads - something Brian did suggest in the podcast.

So in my mind, it feels like the coaches get a bit of a pass on playcalling the last few weeks.  They were limited by their QB.

Why they were starting a QB that didn't allow them to run the offense the way it's supposed to be run is beyond me (maybe that was Harbaugh's decision as the QB coach and he told Gattis to work with the starter? dunno).  I don't have illusions that Cade is going to be a savior.  He did what a decent QB should do against Rutgers, no more.  His tools are obviously more limited than Milton, but if he allows the coaches to open up the playbook and he's generally making the right reads and throws, it's still a pretty big upgrade.

Michigan4Life

November 23rd, 2020 at 5:26 PM ^

The biggest difference is McNamara was able to keep the offense on schedule with his accuracy and ability to find open receivers and Milton was inaccurate and pretty much locked onto 1st read. You can see that Gattis was able to expand on his playcall with McNamara for this reason.

Compare it to Minnesota where Milton kept the offense on schedule and didn't do anything great. It's the same type of playcalling that we were able to see Gattis utilize speed in space unlike MSU, Rutgers and Wisconsin game.

G. Gulo of the Dale

November 23rd, 2020 at 5:26 PM ^

I don't know which Rutgers game was worse:  evidently, our defense in the Hoke game was better and our offense last Saturday--after McNamara came in--was better.  With that being said, the Rutgers team that Hoke lost to on the road finished the season 8-5.  They were not the tire fire that they would soon become.  We also suffered from a horrible spot--thanks to an official who would appear in the 2016 OSU game--on what should have been a first down in Rutgers territory on our final drive.  We had to settle for a long field goal that we missed (perhaps it was blocked?).  Given the horrible positions we put ourselves in, the difference between the outcome of the games (win vs. loss) seemed largely to be a matter of fortune.  

AC1997

November 23rd, 2020 at 1:48 PM ^

I am glad you called out Dax Hill because he was visibly bad on Saturday.  Frankly, I don't think you gave senior Eubanks enough grief for his lazy performance in all things unrelated to catching passes.  Josh Ross at least rebounded later in the game with some good plays, but he's been a mess for most of the season.  Hawkins has been okay I guess, but when Reynolds comes in and you start wondering if he's better that's not a great look for Hawkins.  

You start to look at your upper classmen and their role in picking us up off the mat or fighting out a win against MSU at least.  About the only one who's played his butt off consistently is Kemp.  

Sopwith

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:20 PM ^

Dax's game was potentially even worse. If you look at the play where Hunter R gets over from the S to break up the pass in the end zone, Dax is right on that guy but has no idea where the ball is. That ball is about to drop right into the receivers hands for a TD until Hunter saves the day. Dax was a total mess.

AC1997

November 23rd, 2020 at 5:26 PM ^

Michigan being unable to generate a holding call in the last five years despite putting countless guys into the NFL is one of the biggest mysteries.  My conspiracy theory is that the B10 told their refs to stop calling it a few years ago.  

Seriously....Wormley, Charlton, Hurst, Henry, Glasgow, Clark, Winovoch, Uche, Ryan, Gary.....no holding calls.  

 

WesternWolverine96

November 23rd, 2020 at 1:51 PM ^

nice write up.  

1.  Nice job by reining in the McNamara hype.  I do believe finding a game changing QB is the only way that the program get's going in the right direction.  It would be great if Cade proves he is that guy this year.  With a game changing QB our other pieces will excel and with a great QB we can compete against everyone.  I know we are in a downturn with the rest of the roster, but it's a young team and they should improve with playing time.  A QB could get us back into being a top 10 team in the next few years.  McNamara is the main reason I have a reason to watch this team for the rest of the year.

2.  Good call out on Dax.  Besides the last int, he was having a terrible game.  Looks like he is now trying to do too much. He also took a bad angle on one of those double reverses.   Defense has gotten worse each year since Mattison left.

3.  I am sure that at a minimum we will have some defensive coaching changes in the offseason.  I don't want to get into the Harbaugh thing.  Cade turning out to be a NFL QB is our best hope that this program get's back on track quickly.(including the recruiting)  If not, it will be a long, toxic, and terrible rebuilding process.  We are a missed Rutger's FG away from complete Toxicity as it is.

4.  Just beat PSU and show improvement while doing so!  

AC1997

November 23rd, 2020 at 1:53 PM ^

The defense remains a mess.  I did think that at least Brown stuck more with his core philosophy than the Gerg/Borges approach of spin-the-wheel of tactics for this game.  I also thought that Reynolds and Shibley played solid - and I'd rather guys do the right thing but not be talented enough to execute all the time then to confuse more talented guys who look lost. 

Overall the defense remains a tire fire.  And the coaches do need to take the blame for the lack of sufficient depth at numerous positions as well as overall development of some guys.  

With that being said....by the end of this game we only had four positions match what the off-season depth chart was supposed to look like - Hill, Ross, Jeter/Hinton, and Gray/Green.  We were missing FIVE starters and playing Kemp out of position.  And four of those starters will be playing on Sundays.  There are very few teams in the country that could lose five starters without hitting a wall - and that doesn't even account for the 4.5 starters missing on offense.  

matty blue

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:00 PM ^

completely agree re: reynolds and shibley.  all hail jordan kovacs - he was never going to out-athlete you, but he seemed to always know what the hell he was doing out there.  you can't have a whole team of kovacses, because they're just not going to be able to keep up with 5-stars (or most 4-stars, for that matter.  but they can and do play important roles on championship teams.

bronxblue

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:38 PM ^

By the end of the game Michigan was down 8 starters from Minnesota, 10 if you include Thomas and Collins.  I know the refrain is "awful roster management grumble grumble" but virtually no teams in college football have ready replacements for nearly half their starting lineups that wouldn't dig into untested backups and possibly walk-on types.  Yes, if the standard is Alabama/OSU/Clemson or bust sure, but even there you'd likely have some gaps.  Getting mad Michigan is playing a walk-on backup at DT because they had to move one of their starting DTs out to the end because their two starting, NFL prospect ends are both injured for the 2nd straight week just feels like awful timing.

L'Carpetron Do…

November 23rd, 2020 at 1:57 PM ^

Frames Janklin had one in his own game against Iowa that was stunning and I was surprised it wasn't mentioned on the call with Jamie Mac.

While the final score was bad, Iowa let Penn State back in the game. Clifford sparked them and they made a bunch of plays, cutting it to 10 in the early-mid 4th quarter. Iowa tacked on another FG but Penn State had the ball down 13, their offense was playing well and  they still had a lot of momentum. They were around midfield with 3+ minutes left and Franklin...decided to punt. He had all 3 TOs I guess, and they got the ball back less than a minute later but by then  it was too late. That blew my mind.

That shit was amazing. Good to see Michigan under Harbaugh is hitting these levels now. Yuck. Do you remember when in like 2015/16, they would run a bunch of quick plays at the end of the half to get a quick FG before going into the lockerroom? I don't understand how the same coach can't do things like that anymore. Weird.

FreddieMercuryHayes

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:02 PM ^

The problem with the Shuster analogy is that he pretty much said that he wasn't taking it seriously enough to win at an olympic level.  He stopped eating like crap, lost weight, got into shape, practiced more, and only then did his team start moping up and won the Olympic gold.  I mean, great story, but where does the whole acknowledging one's own shortcomings and activing trying to fix them come up when referencing UM.

ca_prophet

November 23rd, 2020 at 9:00 PM ^

The frustrating thing about our current issue is that we *did* see adjustment from Harbaugh all along.

We got housed by OSU despite an otherwise excellent defense in 2015, so we went out and got a top defensive coach.  And 2016-2017, it sure felt like Brown had answers for the OSU power spread.

Our OL performance started to degrade in 2017, and we went and got Warriner.  A few position swaps and a season of coaching and our OL solidified again.

Stagnating offense?  Bring in Gattis for a modern spread look.

At every turn, it seems like we went out and actively sought to address our issues.  I don't have an answer for why it isn't working out, but here we are.

It is worth noting that all of the big coaching and strategy adjustments were in the offseason.  Harbaugh doesn't seem like a big believer in midseason shakeups (FWIW I'd agree that in college, you're more likely to make things worse that way).  So if you're looking for coaching shakeups, it will have to be in the offseason (and after the pandemic-induced-budget-issues are addressed to the point that any remaining multi-million buyouts are palatable).

 

Erik_in_Dayton

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:04 PM ^

I've generally avoided spiraling into negativity this season, but the clock management at the end of the first half had me wondering whether I should turn off the game.* I think I laughed out loud when they lost about ten seconds to the ref and McNamara having a conversation. 

*I kept watching. Excelsior!

jmblue

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:27 PM ^

It's frustrating that we can't seem to understand that time is the most important thing in a 2-minute drill.  It's better to have 40 seconds and no timeouts than 20 seconds and one timeout.  You can stop the clock a variety of ways (a spike, throwaway, or stepping out), but you can't get back time that is gone.  

chunkums

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:05 PM ^

I'm usually nodding my head in agreement on these game recaps, but there's a lot here that I would find debatable. 

First, and this one is just a minor quibble:

But expecting QB3 to suddenly blow up when the rest of the program is in the shape it's in… well, it's optimistic. We literally just did this. Water status: holding.

Practice reports are usually stupid, but I remember reading numerous practice reports suggesting that in addition to Milton passing McCaffrey, Cade had passed him as well. According to early reports, DMac was fighting for third string. Regarding Milton, it seems like the coaches were intoxicated by his strong arm and size. It's worth remembering that Cade was a solid 4* recruit with an outstanding offer list who came in with more polish than either of the other two. He's also a RS freshman, so it makes sense that he wasn't part of the equation last year.

Regarding playcalling changes, this game felt a lot like the 2019 offense from the second half of the year to my untrained eye. I remember our offense being stupid and clunky in early 2019 before it suddenly just...wasn't. There was a massive difference once Shea got comfortable. I'm not sure how much of it was playcalling and how much of it was execution. Isn't it possible that Cade is generally more comfortable in the offense and executes his post-snap reads better? I'm interested to see the UFR.

Next:

McNamara also benefited from the Michigan ground game ceasing to be nonexistent.

To me, it seemed like having a quarterback complete deep passes immediately opened up running lanes. I thought he was the reason the Michigan running game ceased to be nonexistent. It wasnt' just Haskins who started running well. The other day I charted our pre-McNamara and post-McNamara running game. Everyone did better. Charbonnet ended up with about the same YPC as Haskins:

robpollard

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:25 PM ^

Yes, the DMac "being in school, but not on the team" *is* weird...but maybe it's because he saw himself fighting for not just QB1, but also for QB2 and said, "If they think I'm not the starter, but potentially a QB3 as an upper-classmen, this is clearly the wrong program for me -- I'm not going backward" and that was that.

We tend to ignore people like Chis Evans (who didn't have to come back to Michigan; he could have gone to another school) or Jalen Mayfield (who could have easily sat out the season a la other big-time OL prospects not on Top 5 teams). Skilled people do want to play here.

The program is in dire straits (see: entire defense) but in this one instance, until we know why DMac left, I'm assuming the most likely scenario -- Harbaugh thought DMac wasn't the best QB for the program and, as hundreds of QBs have done over the past few years, DMac decided he was done with the football program and would play somewhere else.

bronxblue

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:52 PM ^

The only thing I don't get about McCaffrey being possibly #3 is he looked competent the little bit of time he has played; like, people extrapolated way more potential from Milton in the couple of plays he made against Wisconsin compared to McCaffrey, who showed ability against a couple of decent defenses.  And I absolutely believe he could have played as well as McNamara did this weekend, so something must have happened that led him to fall in the depth chart/decide he didn't want to play.  

I also really do think Milton being on campus (and the coaches seeing him every day) compared to McCaffrey being at home played something into the evaluation.  It's almost impossible it wouldn't - you are wired to believe what's in front of you and seeing Milton undoubtedly grow and work hard all offseason would lead coaches to believe he deserves a shot at starting.  

robpollard

November 23rd, 2020 at 3:35 PM ^

Milton just *looks* impressive. If you have a QB who can get hit in the chest by a DL yet still zing a 20-yard rope, that's something special. Unfortunately, it's not enough. Accuracy is the most important QB trait, followed closely by quick decision making.

DMac, in his brief appearances in games, certainly looked competent & had potential (e.g., great straight line speed; quick throws), he never wowed me in terms of actual performance; we're talking about someone who has only thrown 35 game passes and completed 50% of them. So is it plausible that RS Freshman who had real offers from Alabama, Georgia and Notre Dame beat him out? Sure.

And I don't think McNamara is some lock to be good the rest of the year -- but as I argued w a couple people who brought out the tired trope of "Maybe we aren't running the Milton b/c we're worried he'll get injured?" having a 4-star QB with a year in the offense/program is all 98% of programs have as the backup QB these days. His ascent to starter is surprising, but not a shock.

1VaBlue1

November 23rd, 2020 at 7:34 PM ^

I've pretty much convinced myself that DMac relieved Shea at UW last year, as the starter.  Unfortunately, UW head hunted him and knocked him out for the next several weeks.  If not for that concussion, I think Shea was done.

Fast forward to spring, when DMac decided to leave...  WTF???

MGoBruski

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:06 PM ^

Having watched live (but having not reviewed film specifically for his performance, I definitely would give a defensive HM to Reynolds. He played his position appropriately on the deep ball and at least once came up and made a stick on a running play.  Not ideal to have a walk-on, but generally that results in noticeable errors.

The Baughz

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:08 PM ^

The 2 minute drill and the poor play of our only 5* defender stood out to me the most.

Dax will be fine, but it was depressing to see him looks so pedestrian.

 

Don

November 23rd, 2020 at 5:59 PM ^

I think what's going on with Shoop and safety coaching is every bit as bizarre as whatever happened to McCaffrey.

How in hell can you be the head coach at Michigan and decide that you can get by with a grad student coaching a major position group? Harbaugh's primary responsibility is to the team and its performance, not Bob Shoop, whatever his situation is. If he can't coach full-time, then it's on Harbaugh to get someone who can.

Mgoczar

November 23rd, 2020 at 2:11 PM ^

Mcnamara is NOTHING like O'korn. To compare his success against purdue to this performance is worst than apples and oranges. Insert any other smarmy phrase here. 

Watch him play, he senses pressure, find the hot read. Just right here...when was the last time a QB at Michigan found the hot read ? I would say never. Eating sacks is a staple as far back as Speight. May be Rudddocccck was better...

Okorn purdue game had scrambles and broken plays with houdini passes, not a read , stand fire, CJ touchdown. 

I am not announcing Mcnamara as the savior. But he was dang good. It was similar against wisconsin , look at those bombs. Straight TD. I bet he scores again if not for shit rain ruining his rythim in that game.

CM does have limited arm strength, but honestly who gives a sh!t. Accuracy trumps arm strength in CFB. I think Milton has potential but coaching staff needs to win games to keep momentum and recruiting going cuz hell this program needs good recruiting now. 

Criticism of harbaugh: stfu and start Mcnamara. Stick to THIS offensive identity and keep up inspiring play of QB and WR. HH is the RB1 and go best PSU and Maryland. 

On defense, get some DTs here now. I think Hinton is showing signs of improvement. Get Mazi going and recruit two more DTs in this class. Get one DT every class. 

I truly believe this offense is primed for take off and next year (TM ...around these parts) it is great. Lest we forget, with this offensive line of inexperience they did win this game. Cherish it. 

AC1997

November 23rd, 2020 at 5:33 PM ^

Funny you say that....I was thinking about how Gardner was the most star crossed QB in recent memory .... And Milton trained under him.  

Both guys have some similar traits...

  • First guy off the bus athletes
  • Good arm
  • Good mobility
  • Poor decision making
  • Hold the ball too long
  • Jumpy when pressured
  • Tantalizing potential that only shows through in spurts.