Basketbullets: At Least There's Walton Comment Count

Ace

Bracket Watch: The Other Bracket Looms


it us. [Marc-Gregor Campredon]

The outlook is grim. After everyone but Derrick Walton sleepwalked their way to a loss against a mediocre Ohio State team, Michigan is 14-9 (4-6 B1G) and out of the projected NCAA tournament field. The Wolverines have to climb out of an increasingly big hole and they may have already missed their chance; KenPom says they've played the easiest conference schedule of any Big Ten team so far, and that's about to change in a major way:

Michigan only has three home games left; of those, a more confident and rested Michigan State squad is by far the most beatable. The Wolverines have yet to win a road game this season; they'll need to take at least two, and quite possibly as many as all five left on the docket, to have a realistic shot at an at-large bid. They're 79th in RPI. I had to edit the second sentence of this post multiple times before it was family-friendly.

If they lose tomorrow night, NIT bracket-watching begins in earnest.

[After THE JUMP: Some good news! Really! Also some bad news.]

At Long Last, Derrick Walton


The bright spot. [Campredon]

If you listened to the Signing Day podcast, you heard that I was already compiling the rather astonishing Derrick Walton stats since Maverick Morgan's (unfortunately accurate) "white collar" comment. Based on both his recent comments and play, it's clear Walton took particularly strong exception to that statement. This was after the Illinois rematch:

“Honestly, because I’m an inner-city kid, I’ve never been called soft ever. That’s never been a question in my mind. Nobody ever questioned my toughness before. I had to do some self-evaluating to see if I was actually soft—nah, I’m joking. (laughs) As a group, we’ve got a lot of inner-city guys. We’ve played a lot of basketball. People play ’21’ games where you’ve gotta be tough. It was kinda confusing.”

Since the first Illinois game, Walton has played like the player he was supposed to become out of high school. His averages in the six games since are all-conference—if not All-American—quality: 34.2 minutes, 19.7 points, 6.8 rebounds, 3.2 assists, 1.5 turnovers. His shooting in that span is remarkable: 55% on twos, 50% on threes, 86% on free throws (on an astonishing 72% FT rate). He's taken greater control of the offense and still playing the most efficient ball of his career.

It may be too late, but it's not too little. It's bitterly disappointing that Walton's breakthrough comes in conjunction with what can only be described as a collapse by Zak Irvin, who has five points on 2-for-18 shooting from the field with zero free throw attempts, five assists, and six turnovers over the last two games. If Michigan gets much of anything out of Irvin over the last week, they're in position to make the tournament with a half-decent close to the conference schedule. They got practically nothing.

Rebounding: Blergh

Speaking of practically nothing, here's a stat: Moe Wagner and Mark Donnal played 39 minutes against Ohio State and combined for one defensive rebound. OSU, the eighth-best offensive rebounding team in the conference, pulled down 48.5% of their misses.

As Jim Calhoun, who I thought did an excellent job breaking down the technical aspect of Saturday's game, pointed out multiple times, Michigan's big men were simply outmuscled. Wagner's issues usually stemmed from positioning; Trevor Thompson was able to box him out and seal him off, which shouldn't be happening on the defensive end of the floor. Donnal couldn't keep Thompson behind him even if he had good positioning initially; there was a rebound with five minutes left that I'm too ennui-stricken to clip in which Donnal had the initial boxout and let Thompson go right around him. Walton couldn't hide his frustration heading into the ensuing timeout.

Wagner doesn't have more than five defensive rebounds in any Big Ten game this year, and he's failed to surpass three in seven of those ten games. Donnal, meanwhile, has recorded multiple defensive rebounds in precisely one B1G game this season (3, vs. Maryland); Walton, the goddang point guard, is literally doubling his defensive rebound rate in conference play. (#FreeTeske.) DJ Wilson's defensive rebounding has also taken a sharp dive in B1G games.

As John Beilein pointed out after the game, this doesn't entirely fall on the bigs, either:

Some of the rebounds, as I watch it, will not be about effort. It will be about the ball bounced to them or they had really good positioning, or it was just about mix-ups on defense—where a guy either got blown by or we missed something somewhere along the line. When a guy steps off to give help and his man slides in and wedges you and gets a rebound—there’s no boxing out; he’s boxed you out before you could ever get there.

Here's an example with multiple breakdowns:

OSU gets Michigan rotating with a high screen, and that rotation is the first problem: as OSU swings the ball into the corner, Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman gets caught ball-watching instead of getting back to a man, a bad habit of his that also led to at least one wide-open Marc Loving three in this game. Either MAAR or Donnal needs to be hauling ass for the paint, where Zak Irvin is tasked with guarding two players by his lonesome, which brings up another issue: M's defensive communication breaks down far too often.

Then there are the actual boxout attempts. MAAR is lost in space; Donnal is beaten to the paint and sealed off by Micah Potter; Irvin falls over after Loving slips around him and boxes him out; Walton never sees Andre Wesson, who ultimately grabs the rebound, sneak in from the corner. Donnal then allows an embarrassingly easy and-one to a guy three inches shorter and 20 pounds lighter than him.

If I had to pick one play to sum up Michigan's defense this year, that one's very much in the running.

Comments

MGoBender

February 6th, 2017 at 7:26 PM ^

Interesting, though I think there's some extrapolation problems.  Well, clearly there's extrapolation problems with Donnal.  Donnal is basically playing very limited minutes and his shooting percentage is super high because he's not taking anything that's not a super high percentage shot.  However, the fact that he's being used over Mo for defense is supported here.

MadMatt

February 6th, 2017 at 7:38 PM ^

I'm tired of watching these games, getting frustrated, and questioning the heart of 12 fine young men who can hack Michigan academics and a Div 1 basketball workload. During the lacross' team's first varsity season, they were predictably terrible. I questioned why this site and others gave us regular updates of their struggles. Enough, the basketball team is not good. I'm letting them step away from the spotlight. Work out your issues fellas without me glaring over your shoulders. Let me know how things look towards the end of B1G regular season.

alum96

February 6th, 2017 at 9:25 PM ^

Mar 2014 - post UK loss, Beilein talked about need to find players to play above the rim.

Nearly 3 years later, there is no change. 

It's just a groundhog day around here - same reasons for losses, same hope for defense and bigs who can jump and play with grit and have dawg in them yada yada.  We will be repeating this 12 months from now, unfortunately in what I believe to be a very dark atmosphere.  These last few classes the hit rate has been outrageously bad

Solid

  • DJ Wilson

Functional

  • MAAR

Washout

  • Doyle
  • Chatman
  • Dawkins

I'm a believer guards and forwards show what they have relatively fast; big men (or power forward types I guess) maybe longer - to that end, no progress from Simpsn or Watson is troubling.  Davis was always a head scratcher.  Not above the rim player.  Tekse is a guy you see contributing to be solid as a JR. 

So in those 2 classes you have DJ Wilson as a plus player, Teske as a maybe, MAAR as a functional player.

And that's where we are now - mostly modest upperclassmen combined with very few players with promise from last few classes. 

Keeps coming down to recruiting - JB is just not suceeding in this environment on that front.  He had his moment - some diamonds in the rough, rode them to NCAA deep runs, never capitalized off that like we all thought would happen.  And forget capitalizing on it - these classes are regressing.

TrueBlue2003

February 6th, 2017 at 11:41 PM ^

Wagner who would also probably be in the solid category.

Defensive rebounding isn't done above the rim.  The perfect defensive rebound is one that hits the floor because everyone has boxed out so well.  It's all effort.  Donnal just lets his guy get into the paint while he watches the shooter instead of getting a body on him.  There's no effort right now.

funkywolve

February 7th, 2017 at 8:29 AM ^

I think you're missing alum96's point. Over the years JB has said a lot of things but at the end of the day, it's just talk. After the UK loss JB was talking about the need to play above the rim but here we are 3 yrs later with a team that isn't very athletic. Lastt year the talk was about how they need to get better on defense. He cleans house with the assistants but their defense is still garbage.

Boner Stabone

February 6th, 2017 at 9:50 PM ^

I will give Beilein one more year to save his job.  He has earned a chance to dig himself out of this mess he has created the last 3 years.  However, like other posters have said, I am sure we will be having the same conversation a year from now. It may be time for a new coach at the end of the 2018 season.

Pepto Bismol

February 7th, 2017 at 11:19 AM ^

Hackett was instrumental in getting Jim Harbaugh here.  Played it beautifully.  He's a legend.  (whispers: He also did some not-so-great stuff)

Beilein's buyout is silly.  Michigan pays him $6 million if they terminate him after this season.  They pay him $5 million if they terminate him after 2017-2018.  It drops to $1.5 and $1 million after '18-'19 and '19-'20 respectively. 

I know we have "money cannon" and all that, but that's a big difference for anyone responsible for the bottom line.  I'd bet he's here through '18-'19, unless the alumni/fans grow so impatient that they force the athletic department's hand.  But this is basketball we're talking about.  That kind of uproar is unlikely.

smwilliams

February 7th, 2017 at 12:12 PM ^

Woof. Yeah, now I'm inclined to agree with you that Beilein will probably be around for 2 more years. I know we all like to think that $ is not an issue, but as long as Harbaugh has the football team in contention, the Athletic Dept. knows the blowback on basketball/hockey won't be as intense and they can save some cash if they give Beilein two more years. 

Assuming they miss the tournament this year, that'll be 4 misses in 10 years (which isn't in line with what expectations should be). What's the rotation look like next year?

PG - X / Brooks

SG - MAAR / Poole

SF - Matthews / Robinson

PF - DJ / Livers

C - Mo / Teske

If Matthews is actually a 5-star talent that we got lucky with and X turns from a player who looks like an 8th grader in a varsity game (from both a size and demeanor perspective) and Mo gets better on the defensive end, I could actually see that team being real good. 

 

Bertello NC

February 7th, 2017 at 12:36 PM ^

This is true. I have a hard time believing that regardless of a tournament appearance this year I think Beilein is here to stay. There is nowhere near the pressure or expectations in bball like there is for football. Next year however should be his final audition to keep his job for 18/19 IMO.

jmerda12

February 6th, 2017 at 10:11 PM ^

Beilein always favors offense to defense, but at least you can hide a weak player on offense. On D your weakness will get exploited 100% of the time until you adjust. I don't know if Teske is the answer, but we know Mark Donnal is not. I'm still dubious Donnal can do anything to get himself benched. Probly a good kid but I'd be curious to see his +/- because for every 3 points he scores he costs us 6.

Voorhees

February 6th, 2017 at 10:11 PM ^

Lets say next year is his last at Michigan. Who would the focus turn to?  Football was 100% JH with everything they had.  What coaches would be a fit to fix our issues? There is no clear cut name that comes to mind.  Any thoughts?

Bertello NC

February 7th, 2017 at 9:43 AM ^

I hate the thought of us having to be in the market for a new coach. For as much as Beilein has done here and the success hes had the trajectory doesnt look good. Theres been a lot of positive chatter about Mark Few's right hand man Tommy Lloyd. Apparently hes a top notch recruiter who has a ton of international ties and was the catlyst behind thier recent transfers, Nigel Goss from Washington, Jordan Mathews from Cal, and Johnathon Williams from Mizzou(whos a beast). Obviously you still have to coach and it isnt just about recruiting but I beleive hes been with Few for 14 years. Im sure hes learned some things. Might be an odd fit geographically and would be a risk taking a rookie head coach. But I'm not sure what big name you'd be able to lure. In the end I really wish Beilein would just make some tweaks to the program and philosophy. He has to do a better job of prospect eval and recruit better athletes plain and simple. A few more "Junk Yard Dogs" would be nice.

scottiek65

February 7th, 2017 at 2:24 PM ^

Watching the OSU game on ESPN another frustrating thing to see and hear. OSUs best shooter was Loving, and hearing and seeing Calhoun point out that Michigans defense continually left Loving completely alone to go cover someone else. the biggest insult to M's defense was when one M player, was it MAAR? ran away from Loving when he had the ball on the 3 pt line to go cover a free man in the corner. but that left Loving WITH the ball open to shoot and of course make a three.  No communication Calhoun pointed out. Why are we uncapable of playing even average B1G defense? 

scottiek65

February 7th, 2017 at 2:34 PM ^

You do realize in all this talk about firing John Beilein that he is SEVEN, count them, seven wins from becoming Michigans ALL-TIME winningest coach in basketball?  Johnny Orr won 209 games, Beilein has won 203 games. 

Imagine the ceremony, Congratulations Coach you have won more games than any Michigan coach!! Oh, and you're fired. 

scottiek65

February 7th, 2017 at 2:51 PM ^

What i find interesting in the KenPom projections is that all eight remaining games are projected close 1 to 5 point games, three wins by 4, 4, and 1. Five losses by 4, 2, 4, 3, 5.  We could win all 8 or lose all 8, but likely to win 4 and lose 4. We all know Michigan needs to win 5 or 6 games for the tourney chances. 

If we lose BOTH games this week we are definitely DONE for the Tourney.  Its such a compliment to Northwesterns year, that our KenPom win probability for the game with them is only 32%.