mGrowOld

June 11th, 2015 at 3:35 PM ^

Time for one of our favorite MGoBlog games....."GUESS THE BANNED POSTER"

Yes, today's contestant is Frogman2 who is giving away his prior presence with the old "bitch about content that was here before you existed" trap.  Couple that with the fact he's a negative racist and well.....no telling WHO he might've been before he was banned.

But one thing we know for sure....guys like Frogman2 dont really every die.  They just change screen names & avatars and continue to make life miserable for everyone else.

Rabbit21

June 11th, 2015 at 3:17 PM ^

Because anything that has to do with indictments and punishments typically runs VERY slowly.  When this happened to my sister charges took about a month and she didn't get a court date for almost nine months. 

There're a lot of people getting hit for wrong-doing and only so much capacity to process the paperwork.

Yostbound and Down

June 11th, 2015 at 3:20 PM ^

I know they were waiting on the blood test as well. Admittedly my familiarity with these laws is not great (I guess thankfully? I don't know) but I can see how it would take some time for these to process.

A little less than three weeks til the arraignment. It does call into question for me why Hackett/Harbaugh/whoever thought it was necessary to lift the suspension. 

xtramelanin

June 11th, 2015 at 3:58 PM ^

can vary widely.   up here it might be 2 weeks in most cases.  down where most of you are it wouldn't surprise me if the time is more like 4 weeks.   and then the blood results have to join up to a report, be sent to some prosecutor's desk/computer, approved and/or ask for more information or investigation, and eventually get typed up in some office somewhere and sent to court.   all that to say the delay is very standard, especially in bigger counties. 

swalburn

June 11th, 2015 at 3:23 PM ^

Generally because they are waiting on a lab report.  In some cases you want to the Blood alcohol content in advance to determine if the charge will be OWI or the new super drunk charge.  

Optimism Attache

June 11th, 2015 at 3:14 PM ^

As I said at the time, you don't just refuse a breathalyzer for fun. He was drinking and knew he was probably over the legal limit (or even downright drunk).  He can redeem himself, but this is really serious. 

xtramelanin

June 11th, 2015 at 6:33 PM ^

in about 99.9% of the cases they will get a warrant and take your blood via vampire.   the 1/2-1 hr delay will only help to lower your BAC by about .015% on average.   meanwhile, your license is suspended for a year and the ability to get a 'hardship appeal' to get to drive during that year has been all but eliminated. 

and yes, breath tests are easier to contest than the blood, but the blood has it's issues too.  the MSP lab uses a b.s. error margin and uncertainty budget, calculated with faulty statistical methods. 

Blueverine

June 11th, 2015 at 3:22 PM ^

a different outcome. HOPING that he was not drunk or impaired, but this doesn't look good. As Jimbo's first test of principles, I hope he takes the long view and treats this with the benefit of the program in mind and not just of his friend.  Tough call, but if Minick is found guilty, he should channel his inner Bo and reinstate the suspension.

Haywood Jablomy

June 11th, 2015 at 3:38 PM ^

get suspended from thier livelyhood for a dui?  Most people would suffer their fate at the hands of the law and any natural conseqeunces (professional driver implications). He has already served a suspension and will now have to face the financial and legal consequences of his decision. 

Too many, too eager to cast stones.

The Mad Hatter

June 11th, 2015 at 3:29 PM ^

While lifting his suspension just before the charges were announced isn't a great look, I'm choosing to not care about this.

He'll probably plead guilty to a reduced charge and get sentenced to probation.  Maybe mandatory AA meetings and some massive fines.

That's enough punishment in my book.

DarkWolverine

June 11th, 2015 at 4:02 PM ^

Agreed, Guy Needs To Be Fired
You really can't hire a friend(who never worked in an AD or in football operations, and so questionable qualifications) and then give additional special treatment. Minick also lied to police about the circumstances of his one truck accident, said he was not drinking, refused the breathalyzer, and that another car ran him off the road. Might feel a bit different if had not added lying to drunk driving.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

SalvatoreQuattro

June 11th, 2015 at 4:39 PM ^

then all are held accountable to the same standard no matter their position in life. This sliding scale approach that many love to apply inherently engenders animosity among members of a community because the implication is that others are permitted to get away with something whilst they are not. That is a crack in the foundation of your team. The standards have to be simple and applied to everyone with equal force.

 

 

 

SalvatoreQuattro

June 11th, 2015 at 4:58 PM ^

seriousness of  the alleged crime. A DUI should merit the same response no matter who on the team did it. It's a serious act that goes beyond the "greater responsibility with great standards" argument you put forth. Any person who committs such an act on the team should be held to the same standards because the position of a person on the team does not alter the seriousness of the act itself.

 

If we were talking about theft of crab legs then yeah, I could see your point. But not here.  Not when drunk driving is the cause of 10,000 deaths each year.

pescadero

June 11th, 2015 at 5:26 PM ^

If it is merely a DUI - no.

 

If it's a DUI, combined with a one car accident, combined with saying he was not drinking, combined with refusing the breathalyzer, and combined with a false claim that another car ran him off the road... Yeah, I think so.

Boogeyman

June 11th, 2015 at 4:15 PM ^

Of this to me is that, Colonel Minick probably took dozens of Marines rank, pay and put them on restriction for the same incident. However, he must have learned nothing even after presiding over those NJPs or conducting battalion safety briefs every Friday. With that said, I do believe everyone should be given a second chance (unless they murder or rape somebody). If you don't believe in second chances, then I could argue that Harbaugh shouldn't be our coach, considering he also has a DUI on his record.

Sione's Flow

June 11th, 2015 at 6:16 PM ^

If he is guilty of a DUI, then let the courts handle his punishment. After the courts have their say, then it's up to Jim Harbaugh to handle it from the UM side. We can all have opinions on the appropriate punishment, but ultimately it's up to his good friend to deal with.