[Bryan Fuller]

Preview 2019: Heuristics And Stupid Prediction Comment Count

Brian August 30th, 2019 at 2:53 PM

Previously: Podcast 11.0A, Podcast 11.0B, Podcast 11.0C. The Story. Quarterback. Running Back. Wide Receiver. Tight End. Offensive Tackle. Interior OL. Defensive End. Defensive Tackle. Linebacker. Cornerback. Safety. Special Teams. 5Q5A Offense. 5Q5A Defense.

Heuristicland

Turnover Margin

9674598390_9cc93827ae_o

The theory of turnover margin: it is pretty random. Teams that find themselves at one end or the other at the end of the year are likely to rebound towards the average. So teams towards the top will tend to be overrated and vice versa. Nonrandom factors to evaluate: quarterback experience, quarterback pressure applied and received, and odd running backs like Mike Hart who just don't fumble.

Year Margin Int + Fumb + Sacks + Int - Fumb - Sacks -
2007 0.15 (41st) 14 15 2.46(33rd) 14 13 2.17 (67th)
2008 -.83 (104th) 9 11 2.42(33rd) 12 18 1.83 (57th)
2009 -1.00 (115th) 11 5 1.83(68th) 15 13 2.33 (83rd)
2010 -0.77(109th) 12 7 1.38(98th) 15 14 0.85(10th)
2011 +0.54 (25th) 9 20 2.31 (29th) 16 6 1.38 (33rd)
2012 -0.69 (99th) 7 11 1.69 (69th) 19 8 1.38 (28th)
2013 +0.38(33rd) 17 9 1.9 (64th) 13 8 2.77 (109th)
2014 -1.33 (124th) 5 5 2.4 (49th) 18 8 2.2 (63rd)
2015 -0.31 (92nd) 10 2 2.5 (32nd) 10 6 1.4 (28th)
2016 +0.54 (24th) 13 6 3.54(5th) 7 5 1.69 (39th)
2017 -0.31 (90th) 10 7 3.23(8th) 10 11 2.77 (111th)
2018 +0.38 (35th) 11 6 10.5% (3rd) 9 3 5.4% (43rd)

Let's move to sack rates instead of raw numbers; probably should have done this years ago. Michigan landed a little above average in turnover margin, which is about what you'd expect since they got after the QB more than their quarterback was gotten after.

Not a lot to say as a result. Michigan wasn't an outlier and shouldn't expect to be better or worse this year than you might expect. Michigan gets their QB and four OL back, which should help keep Michigan TOs low. If they can keep up the pressure you'd expect them to be modestly positive again at the end of the year. But turnovers are a fickle mistress, as always.

[After the JUMP: position switches are minimal]

Position Switches

45329125944_5c99440608_k

Mason is about it [Patrick Barron]

Theory of position switches: if you are starting or considering starting a guy who was playing somewhere else a year ago, that position is in trouble. There are degrees of this. When Notre Dame moved Travis Thomas, a useful backup at tailback, to linebacker and then declared him a starter, there was no way that could end well. Wisconsin's flip of LB Travis Beckum to tight end was less ominous because Wisconsin had a solid linebacking corps and Beckum hadn't established himself on that side of the ball.

Virtually none that don't have extenuating circumstances. We don't count very minor moves like WDE to SDE and the like. The list:

Ben Mason to DT. Gattis-related, doesn't say anything about DL. Unless he plays on standard downs.

Phil Paea to DT. Eh.

An Embarrassing Prediction, No Doubt

So… expectations. Early lines for Michigan games:

  • @ Wisconsin: Michigan –7.5
  • Iowa: Michigan –15.5
  • Notre Dame: Michigan –7
  • MSU: Michigan –14
  • OSU: Michigan –3.5

Penn State isn't listed but they're a pick'em at Iowa, implying a –12 Michigan spread, and a –13.5 dog at OSU, implying a -16 Michigan point spread.

Historically, 7 point favorites win 70% of the time and 14 point favorites win 83% of the time. Michigan's approximate cumulative expected losses before OSU is on the order of 1.1 plus whatever Indiana and Maryland can muster. This seems good! It makes me very nervous.

Worst Case Barring Extreme Injury Scenarios

It would take an awful lot of disappointment and bad luck to not go 9-3, which would require Michigan losing against OSU, both of the ~7 point spreads (Wisconsin and ND) and then dropping a game they're currently favored in by two touchdowns.

Best Case

Michigan's favored in every game. 12-0.

Final Verdict

I've made this point a couple times in recent Q&A sessions but I'm not sure I've mentioned it here: a major reason to believe this might be The Year is quarterback depth.

Historically, Michigan's backup quarterbacks have been guys like Lunatic Freshman Ryan Mallett, I Was Just Playing Wide Receiver Devin Gardner, and John O'Korn. When Michigan's starting QBs get hurt it's over. (Even if Chad Henne gets a shot.)By contrast OSU has brought Kenny Guiton, Cardale Jones, and Dwayne Haskins off the bench, the latter two to seal competitive Games.

This year Michigan has Dylan McCaffrey seemingly locked and loaded; OSU's backup quarterback is a grad transfer from Kentucky. If that becomes relevant, whether it's before the Game or during it, it should be Michigan pulling away.

OOC
8/31 MTSU Must win
9/7 Army Must win
10/26 Notre Dame Tossup
Conference
9/21 @ Wisconsin Lean to win
9/28 Rutgers Must win
10/5 Iowa Lean to win
10/19 @ Illinois Must win
11/2 @ Penn State Lean to win
11/16 @ Maryland Must win
11/10 MSU Must win
11/17 Indiana Must win
11/24 @ Ohio State Tossup
Absent:

Purdue, Minnesota, Nebraska, Northwestern

11-1. The most likely 1 is OSU, of course, but I think Michigan should win that game. "Should" and "did" have not often met in the recent history of the rivalry.

Comments

evenyoubrutus

August 30th, 2019 at 4:01 PM ^

Great stuff, well researched as always. We are unbelievably spoiled and lucky to have this blog. Thank you Brian for everything.

6-6, if a few lucky bounces roll our way.

BlueLikeJazz

August 30th, 2019 at 4:01 PM ^

Thanks again Brian for your excellent work. My Michigan football fandom would’ve fizzled a fair bit over the last decade if it wasn’t for this site. 

Go blue!

Blue In NC

August 30th, 2019 at 4:21 PM ^

Mark me down for 10-2.  I think the O will be very strong but I am not quite as optimistic on D given the lack of depth and frankly, not that many playmakers (unless Hill, McGrone/Anthony emerge and Dwumfour/Thomas are fully healthy).  But if 10-2 includes a win over OSU, I am quite fine with 10-2.

ChiCityWolverine

August 30th, 2019 at 4:42 PM ^

My head says there's a loss between @Wisconsin/@Penn Sate/ND and we roll into "The Game" week 10-1. My heart can't predict a win in that one anymore until I see it, but I'll be in the Big House supporting the boys in blue on November 30th.

Only time I've ever been on the field there was after 2011 OSU and would very much like another chance to do so.

Yinka Double Dare

August 30th, 2019 at 4:22 PM ^

Always skittish of Penn State at night. But it's the best case scenario schedule. OSU, Notre Dame and State all in Ann Arbor. Iowa rotates back on the schedule but not at Kinnick. Wisconsin early when they're more likely still playing the bad QB from last year.  Also appreciate the big B1G games on FOX being the early game so it will be somewhat less lubricated Sconnie fans at 11am. Penn State doesn't look as good as last year. Returning senior starting QB and a backup we like. 4 OL returnees. LFG.

BuckeyeChuck

August 30th, 2019 at 4:25 PM ^

As I wiggle my evil, mystical fingers toward you: "You're feeling very comfortable. You're beginning to like the way things appear. You feel good about yourselves. Everything will be different this season. It has to turn your way sometime. This is going to be the year. Feel good about yourselves. Yes, you're feeling happy. Very, very happy. Nothing could possibly go wrong."

/hypnotic trance

corundum

August 30th, 2019 at 4:27 PM ^

Hell yeah, brothers! I'm about to leave Houston and head to Austin to watch CFB all weekend! I miss the Michigan weather but damn am I happy to have Michigan football back in my life.

notetoself

August 30th, 2019 at 4:30 PM ^

fun story - i didn't know what the word "heuristic" meant for many years because the UM computer engineering curriculum didn't define it. in one of the 300 level programming classes they just started using the word for a search algorithm and said "it doesn't work very well", which de facto became the understood definition: it doesn't work very well. needless to say, once i learned the real definition, years later, i started to and still use that word all the damn time (in the parlance of our time)

stephenrjking

August 30th, 2019 at 4:38 PM ^

Wow. That’s optimism. 

I am not that confident in our defense. It will be ok, for the most part. But I think there are personnel holes to be exploited and, perhaps, schematic ones as well. 

I share Brian’s optimism for the offense. If anything, cautiously, because it doesn’t seem real that it could be as good as I think it should be this year. 

But the offense should produce jaw-dropping results. If it doesn’t, it’s a disappointment. 

And I agree with the QB opinion: we’ve got the best QB situation we’ve had in a long time. Maybe 1999-2000. And elite QB play can make a good team great. 

It won’t win a national title. Ceiling, can make the playoff. Floor? Actually pretty bad with the schedule. 

But I think Michigan loses one or two games. I have no idea about the last one, but we need it desperately. Why not this year?

smwilliams

August 30th, 2019 at 4:45 PM ^

Under Harbaugh, Michigan has lost 5 very specific types of games:

Season Openers on the road against Top 25 competition (2): at Utah, at Notre Dame

MSU at home (2)

OSU (4)

Bowl Games in the South (3)

The other three losses are at Kinnick, Madison, and the White Out.

They don’t have the first type and the last doesn’t apply to the regular season. 

So, this hinges on a few questions:

- Can they beat Ohio State?

- Does Sparty’s insane luck in Ann Arbor run out?

- Can they win in Madison and State College?

I see 10-2. Don’t think MSU wins in Ann Arbor again. I think they split the road games and lose to the Buckeyes again. 

Another meaningless NY6 bowl. 

 

Eng1980

August 30th, 2019 at 8:51 PM ^

Buckeyes are loaded with talent; good recruiting and good coaching.  All the other loses are due to injuries or an occassional bad game.   There is  no real pattern or cause and effect.  Biggest factor is lack of depth across the roster.  It looks like JH fixed that.  I hope  any weaknesses witll  be fixed  with balance  and game planning.

Oldadguy

August 31st, 2019 at 10:20 AM ^

How does anyone know if OSU has good coaching? I’m reading this in the media too. Ryan day wins two games and he’s a good coach? The guy is completely unproven. He could be the next Lincoln Riley or the next Luke fickell interim coach. At minimum he is no urban Meyer. That uncertainty alone has to put OSU in question as to how good they will really be.