[Patrick Barron]

Penn State 28, Michigan 21 Comment Count

Ace October 19th, 2019 at 11:58 PM

I don't know what to do with this.

Michigan fell in a 21-0 hole at Penn State and looked well on their way to yet another road debacle against a ranked opponent to add to that stat everyone mentions when Michigan goes on the road against a ranked opponent. Everything from the gameplan to the execution looked ugly. On one side, the Wolverines slammed into the PSU defensive line and dropped potential first downs; on the other, Sean Clifford started hitting shots downfield, including a slot fade to KJ Hamler, who Michigan should've recruited harder, for what looked at the time like an insurmountable three-touchdown lead. Jim Harbaugh called for a punt on fourth-and-one in PSU territory. The officials probably missed an offensive pass interference on the second PSU touchdown.

Then, in a way seemingly designed to inflict maximum emotional pain on both fanbases, Michigan clawed their way back into it. Patterson responded to the Hamler touchdown by leading an eight-play, 75-yard drive capped by a 12-yard Zach Charbonnet touchdown run—though only after an improbable Ronnie Bell snag-a-fumble-out-of-midair-and-run touchdown was negated by penalty. After a deeply bizarre sequence in which Harbaugh had Jake Moody attempt a 58-yard field goal—surprise, it was short—and James Franklin turtled with three timeouts at midfield, the teams went to the locker room with the score at 21-7, Penn State.

The defense set a different tone in the third quarter, limiting PSU to 16 yards, but it looked like the offense failed to take advantage until their final drive of the quarter, when Charbonnet accounted for 45 yards and a touchdown to pull Michigan, improbably, within seven points.

Like cats toying with prey, PSU batted the lead back up to 14 to open the fourth quarter; Hamler found himself one-on-one with Josh Metellus and Clifford made no mistake in taking advantage of a safety defending one of the country's fastest slot receivers. But Michigan fought back again; Bell took a screen 35 yards and Patterson banged in a QB sneak to make it 28-21.

Ronnie Bell's teammates comfort him on the sideline. [Barron]

The defense booted Penn State off the field in three plays, setting up a drive for the tie. While nothing came easy, Patterson looked in his element, hitting receivers on time when plays worked as designed and creating with his legs when they didn't. A crossing route to Erick All set Michigan up with first and goal, but two runs and an incomplete pass only advanced the ball to the three-yard line to set up fourth down.

Patterson niftily escaped pressure, stepped up in the pocket, and found Bell with a sliver of space over the middle. The pass slipped through Bell's hands and fell harmlessly to the turf. Following a first down run by Hamler, PSU knelt out the clock.

All I know is I feel for Bell, who was shown crying on the sideline by ABC's cameras after the drop; he'd played a hell of a game to that point. Patterson's near-heroics inspired newfound confidence, though his stat line (6.7 yards per attempt, no TDs, one INT) looked familiar. The coaching of Harbaugh and Gattis often confounded, but the second-half gameplan looked sound. The defense looked like it was going to take a 2017-style pasting until they stiffened up considerably. Michigan looked overwhelmed by a night game in White Out conditions until they turned that crowd into a collective nervous wreck.

I don't know. Michigan is clearly not winning the Big Ten, and the rest of the schedule is going to be tough, and losing stinks. This time they went down fighting. Whether that's of great comfort is up to you.

[Hit THE JUMP for the box score.]

Comments

NorcalBlue

October 20th, 2019 at 12:19 AM ^

By people overrating Michigan - do you mean the $8 million dollar man himself?  Didn't he say they should be considered favorites to win the B1G?  And now they're out of it in mid-October.  Year 5 sir - Year 5.  9 of 11 starters back on offense - total disgrace.  We'll gettem' next year though - uh huh.

Um1994

October 20th, 2019 at 12:25 AM ^

Why are so people totally obsessed with the coaches salary?  As if it's coming directly from your pocket.  I don't know -- class envy?  Would you feel better if we went 7-5 every year but only paid the coach $2 million per year?

bronxblue

October 20th, 2019 at 12:29 AM ^

These are often the same people who hate the idea of paying players for anything.  It's some weird jealousy or distorted view of value.

Michigan isn't losing because they don't have enough money to spend on someone or something to make the tram better.  If you want to complain that they don't win enough with the HC that's fine, but how much is written on his check is sort of irrelevant.

crg

October 20th, 2019 at 8:20 AM ^

I agree with you bronx that the amount of Harbaugh's salary is not an issue in and of itself - the AD is clearly not in dire financial straits by it and it is mostly determined by the market.  However, there is a greater philosophical argument to be had about having any public university's (and U.S. state's) highest paid employees be football and basketball coaches (which is not just a UM issue).

Also, this is separate from the issue of paying players, which has been (and is) discussed ad nauseum elsewhere.

Red Dragon

October 20th, 2019 at 9:11 AM ^

Yes, this.  He’s one of the best paid in the country and is not proving why.  Lack of results and too many questions.  Why weren’t we ready for the first play?  We only had ALL week to prepare for THAT moment but still had to burn a TO.  Then...all of the stupid penalties.  Where is the discipline?  That all comes from coaching.  Then, we punt on 4th and 1 in PSU territory.  Then, we attempt  58 yard field goal.  
 

as said before, it all comes down to coaching...

lbpeley

October 20th, 2019 at 10:09 AM ^

Exactly. You whiners about the salary whiners really think it's because the salary whiners want to save a buck?! How dense and clueless are you? It's all about the fact that UM is paying Top 5 money to a Top 30 coach. Laughable that you could take that any other way. Would you pay Ferrari money for a Ford Focus? 

 

Newton Gimmick

October 20th, 2019 at 10:26 AM ^

This seems to be saying we would be fine with these results if Harbaugh made $3.5 million.

"Accountability" is a nice sports talk radio word, but holding a guy whom I've never met "accountable" isn't of interest to me and has nothing to do with why I am a fan.   It doesn't make the wins better or the losses worse.

I want Michigan to do what is best for the program moving forward, period.  Harbaugh or no Harbaugh, 9 million dollar coach or 4 million dollar coach, I don't care how. 

BoHarb

October 20th, 2019 at 10:49 AM ^

Because we are paying coach H national championship money for cant win big ten east results. Sure we could pay him even more just to prove money ain't no thang to us aristocratic UM'ers - that'll show em!  Pull your head out of whatever orifice in which it is currently lodged.

MileHighWolverine

October 20th, 2019 at 11:31 AM ^

@Um1994 - it bothers me because it's a sign of incompetence. If you pay top 3 salaries for results that get you middle of the road, or bottom 1/3rd results, you're doing something very wrong. Especially if you espouse the "leaders and best" mantra non-stop.

Kind of like paying for a Ferrari but getting a Camry and being told "why are you so focused on the price you paid, it's a car!"

truferblue22

October 20th, 2019 at 4:10 PM ^

Do you pay his fucking salary? Michigan's prices haven't changed so don't tell me you are paying more for him than you would for anyone else. 

 

Also, I can only imagine how people like you would react if he said we shouldn't be considered favorites for the B1G. Shut up and grow up or go cheer for someone else. 

JFW

October 20th, 2019 at 9:25 AM ^

I love how all last year people were bitching about getting a new modern OC, how Harbaugh was too stubborn to change, and how in year four we needed “a don brown of the offense”

then Harbaugh goes out and gets a sought after coach, gives him the keys, and essentially steps back. Everyone was thrilled and predicting joy. 
 

Well, it didn’t work out as quickly as people wanted so the internet outrage machine listens to Valenti and Feinbaum and parrots their attitude. Has to be nice. “I said I wanted Harbaugh to switch but I wanted him to get the 100% sure thing guy (but don’t pay him too much) not someone with any bit of risk! That would be UNACCEPTABLE!!”
 

I thought UM was going to get blown out. I thought that the Gattis experiment was maybe an utter failure. But then they got their stuff together against a good D on the road and made a game of it. 
 

Am I disappointed they didn’t win? Hell yes. But I’m happy as hell to see signs of life, and especially signs of mental toughness we didn’t see in the Wisconsin game. 
 

Go Blue. And hopefully we build off of this for next week.

 

propstb11

October 20th, 2019 at 9:47 PM ^

Totally agree here with JFW here... especially about the bit of the offense showing signs of life.

There were many plays of getting Nico, Ronnie and DPJ in space.

 

Patterson finally looked comfortable in the pocket and threw several strikes.

My personal favorite was the 4th and goal QB sneak where Mason hammered Patterson just enough to get the ball over the line.  Bo would have been proud.  But, honestly a hybrid of Gattis' RPO spread complimented by Har-man-smash mouth-ball depending on the situation and opponent defensive personnel could develop into overwhelmingly dominant offense.

 

I think we are seeing it's birth and infancy.

Take out our frustration and anger on ND.

Go Blue!!!

raleighwood

October 20th, 2019 at 8:34 AM ^

This is not an 8-4 roster.  They returned nine of 11 from an offense that was second in the B1G in scoring last year.  That includes several All B1G caliber linemen, multiple NFL level receivers and a senior 5☆ QB.

The defense is reloading but returns multiple starters (Hudson, Hill, Metellus) or significant contributors (Hutchison, Paye, Thomas.....).  They've been a Top 5 defense for much of the season (pretty much everything except for the first half against Wisconsin).

This is college football.  Players leave every year.  There are not four teams on Michigan's schedule with a better roster.....including Penn State.

trueblueintexas

October 20th, 2019 at 1:10 AM ^

I was pleasantly surprised the team didn’t fold up shop and go home after getting down 21-0 but this game finally did it for me. I really don’t care what happens the rest of the season. If Harbaugh can beat OSU he should get one more year to prove he can field a team which can challenge for a conference championship. 
If Harbaugh can’t beat OSU this year, he needs to go. No excuses, no blaming refs, no rationalizing injuries or mistakes, whatever. Beat OSU this year. That is now the only measuring stick for the Harbaugh era at Michigan. 

Glennsta

October 20th, 2019 at 7:02 AM ^

I agree with you that JH shouldn't be gone, but don't make it sound like this is a coaching graveyard. $150M+ revenue, name recognition of the brand, plus state-of-the-art facilities are a huge draw. 

And football coaches generically are not the type of people who shy away from challenges, especially those generated by anonymous people behind keyboards.  If we got onto the coaching carousel at the right time, we would do fine.

wolverine1987

October 20th, 2019 at 9:10 AM ^

The argument that we can't let a coach go because "who are we going to get that's better" is pretty dumb. 95% of the time every new coach hired in America is not a proven commodity. Our perceived arrogance has zero influence on getting a new coach either. It's always a calculated risk, every time. The only question is, is your coach doing the best job possible with the resources he has? Harbaugh, clearly, is not. 

Having said all that, I'm not advocating firing. But I wouldn't be upset if he retired or quit. 

Newton Gimmick

October 20th, 2019 at 10:40 AM ^

I wouldn't say it's dumb.  The catharsis from firing someone, whom we feel 'deserves' it, lasts about 20 minutes.  Then there is a vacuum to fill and the scrambling to fill it and sometimes chaos from that if there are no good fits available.  (See: Tennessee in 2017.)  And there are costs to turnover (e.g. lost recruiting classes in a transition year, new schemes installed) -- as we know well.

There is also the question: do we think we'll be better off in the future with Harbaugh trying to fix the team's issues, or with Warde trying to fix the coaching staff?  These are the responsible comparisons to make.  "Fire first and ask questions later" is 97.1-level fan-speak for people who have no other insights.