Landon and Levi Paulsen
Pay these myen their danegeld. [via BHGP]

Fee Fi Foe Film: Iowa Offense 2019 Comment Count

Seth October 3rd, 2019 at 9:02 AM

Resources: My charting, Iowa game notes, Iowa roster, CFBstats

Yep, it's Iowa.

The film: Yep, it's El Assico. Yes, Iowa has played two of Michigan's opponents—Rutgers and MTSU—since their 38-14 opening romp over Not THAT Miami. The only one of those with a pulse was ISU, a rain-soaked event in Ames that ended in a perfectly El Assico 18-17. For the un-EDSBS initiated, this rivalry is referred to "El-Assico" because it takes place early in the season before either team has really had a chance to remember how to football correctly. This particular episode will probably be the example we use in the future to show what that means. There was a rain delay. People were falling down. Linemen and linebackers, possessed by evil spirits, ran right past eminently hittable opponents to attack ghosts, or teammates.

Personnel: My diagram:

image

PDF version, full-size version (or click on the image)

Two NFL-bound OTs are the highlight here of course. Tristan Wirfs is a donkey-hatin' Taylor Lewan minus two inches, and easily the best run blocker I've ever charted. Left tackle Alaric Jackson, the Detroiter who was all set to sign with Michigan until Drevno didn't send an LOI, has been out most of the season with a knee injury. He dressed but did not play last week versus MTSU, and is listed second on the depth chart at LT this week behind Wirfs. I'm guessing they'll try to get him out there, but he won't be 100%. He has a star for past performance, which had him PFF's top offensive tackle in the conference and one of the best pass protectors in the nation.

In the event Jackson can't go, Iowa has been playing around with two responses, both fine. One is to put one of the twin vikings, sixth OL Levi Paulsen (+3.5/-0, –1 pass pro), at right tackle and move Wirfs to left. The other is to leave Wirfs where he is and play a redshirt sophomore named Mark Kallenberger (+3/-1, –0.5 pass pro) at left tackle. I think they believe Paulsen's a better run blocker, but I thought Kallenberger was the better answer; he's less refined but a load as a run blocker, athletic enough for pass pro (Paulsen is more of a guard), and allows Wirfs to stay at right tackle, where he's more comfortable smashing puny humans' faces into dirt.

[after THE JUMP: EL ASSSSSIIIICCCCOOOOOO]

The interior is usually a strength of Iowa's but this group seems like a stopover until the next one's ready. C Tyler Linderbaum (+3/-4.5, –5!!!) was a major disappointment after all the hype he gets out of Iowa City. Stanley got constant pressure from Linderbaum missing blitz pickups, and a big part of the team's miserable 5/10 day in protection pickups was also probably on the redshirt freshman's line calls. Walk-on RG Cole Banwart (+1/-3, –0), filling in for injured Kyler Schott, isn't athletic enough to be of any use downfield (his negatives were mostly on screens), but he knows where to be. The other viking twin, LG Landen Paulsen (+4/-8, –2) had a reach block, a good scoop, and saved a play he almost ruined by diving back and getting the legs of a LB who ran by him, but the other side of his aggressiveness on zones is he cyan'd himself by leaving early and blocking nobody all the time. Any 8th century monks among our readership will also be happy to know that yes, even old Brother Unferth in his habit can probably outrun this Dane.

The gray on TE Nate Wieting (+4.5/-0 in the run game, 1 negative pass pro event in my charting) is because he was last year's starting fullback, drafted into tight end because they lost two guys early to the draft (gooooo Lions!). He'd be a good second banana/H-back but is a major comedown from the Iowa standard at that position, with a backup in Shaun Beyer (+0/-3, –2 in 10 snaps) who's probably responsible for Iowa going away from their two-TE formula. Fullback Brady Ross (+3/-3, –2) was mostly used as a decoy (don't follow the fullback!) or backside insert.

The running back rotation this year is more defined than in the past. The feature back is Mekhi Sargent (+7.5/-2, –1), a Toussaint-ish guy who can dodge a safety and is game to fight for extra yards, but also gets stopped immediately on contact and shoved into his QB's lap at times because of physics. He no longer has to share starts with RB Ivory Kelly-Martin (+5/0, –1), who's a good blocker and thus the 3rd down back. They work in bowling ball Toren Young (didn't chart) and a few plays for scatback true freshman Tyler Goodson, whose vision is suspect, but his speed and cuts are dangerous.

The two starting receivers remind me of our old African refugees. The Jehu Chesson is WR Ihmir Smith-Marsette, a lanky speedster who gets one or two jet sweep carries a game, has a few long kick returns over his career, and is averaging 12.7 yards per target with a 75% catch rate—ISU used an extra safety to bracket him all day. The Darboh is WR Brandon Smith, who gets the occasional smoke screen and hurdles the occasional fool, leading the team in targets but producing just 6.1 YPT because he's the nominal target on a lot of bad throws. Slot receiver Nico Ragaini is a sort of Grant Perry—a good route runner with iffy hands; his 58% catch rate for a slot receiver is only partly due to Stanley locking onto him on 3rd downs. Their shared backup is redshirt freshman Tyrone Tracy, who lost to Ragaini in the slot sweepstakes last fall.

According to the game notes Oliver Martin had two snaps in this game. He's #5 on the roster, and #5 on the depth chart, waiting his turn for an injury or perhaps a starting job to open up in a couple of years when Smith-Marsette and Smith have graduated. Good things come to those who wait.

--------------------------------

Spread, Pro-Style, or Hybrid? Pro-Style.

Formation   Personnel   Playcall
Down Type Gun Pistol Ace I-Form   Avg WRs   Pass PA RPO Run
Standard 22 - 4 22   2.25   17 8 - 23
Passing 17 - 1 5   2.78   14 2 - 6
Total 55% - 7% 38%   2.42   44% 14% - 41%

They do a lot more passing than I remember. First downs were passes 44% of the time. Play-action came out before the run play it played off. And they aren't afraid to go to the gun half the time. There were even a couple of zone reads in there.

Basketball on Grass or MANBALL? Iowa historically has been a stretch zone team but this year they're a lot more inside zone with a lead fullback, probably because of the tight end replacement issues.

Hurry it up or grind it out? Grind. Against MTSU Iowa actually got to the line and ran some tempo, so that's in the toolbag now. But far more often they'll be snapping the ball with 1 second on the playclock. They huddle.

Quarterback Dilithium Level (Scale: 1 [Navarre] to 10 [Denard]): I'm giving Nate Stanley a 4, not for speed. On speed alone he's a 1 or 2:

But Iowa doesn't mind using him on some called runs because he's a truck. Several times he escaped pressure because a guy hit him and fell down. Quarterback sneaks in this game averaged three yards. Arm tackles won't do; you have to get in this guy's legs and then hope to not get hit by the shoulder.

We might as well do the…

HenneChart:

Iowa vs Iowa St Good   Neutral   Bad   Ovr
Quarterback DO CA SCR   PR MA   BA TA IN BR   DSR PFF
Nate Stanley 5+ 10(3) 2   2 1   1 4 10xxx 1   52% 68.9

Pro Football Focus spent much of August explaining "it's the inaccuracy" to livid Iowa fans after PFF ranked Stanley 51st among FBS QBs, one spot behind WMU's Jon Wassink. As of a week ago he was still in the 60s (adequate), fifth on a list of Big Ten quarterbacks that, if it wasn't obvious already, proves the universe has something against you personally.

I've taken to calling Stanley "Big Nate" for how much he reminds me of Ben Roethlisberger. They're both big, frustratingly inaccurate, and dress alike, from the black hats down to the distinctive ankle cornerbacks.

Also like Roethlisberger, exactly four times a game Nate Stanley will do a thing that justifies using his name in a sentence with "NFL":

I mean…

Right?

Frames Janklin Factor: This won't be relevant because Kirk Ferentz turns into Sun Tzu when playing Michigan. I emphasize this fact because it's easy to fall into the trap of believing Ferentz has never heard of a clock. Let's join Iowa past midfield and midway into their 2 minute drill:

I get not wanting to leave time on the clock for your opponent, and three timeouts are worth 10 seconds each. Still not sure you want to huddle and run yourself down to just 20 seconds, which is time for three or maybe four plays. Iowa got in three more before time ran out. He also punted on 4th and 1 from his 36 (they are unstoppable on sneaks remember), kicked a FG on 4th and 1 from the 7, and at 4th and 3 from midfield he took a delay of game. The 4th and 9 from the 50 that went for a touchback in the 2nd Q was defensible since it was pretty rainy at that point.

Then there was the end of the game. Needing just a first down to seal a 1-point win, Ferentz called his base run play twice, and ISU sold out to stop it for a minimal gain twice. On 3rd and long they did a play-action rollout that got nowhere near the 1st down and got their TE run out of bounds, meaning ISU got to start their final drive with 1:30 instead of 0:40 on the clock. It's really too bad we never get to play this Ferentz.

(Then an ISU player ran over his own guy on the punt return. EL ASSSSICCCCOOOO!!!)

Dangerman:

Tristan Wirfs is a bad bad man. He was projected to go in the top ten by just about everybody last offseason, and since then if opinions were edited it's only been to drop any "if he keeps developing" caveats. PFF had him at an 87.2 pass pro grade (top 6 nationally) before this game, which merely added another 33 perfect snaps—most of them at left tackle—to the average.

But that's the side show. What they all love about Wirfs is he's the best run blocking prospect…ever. This checks out. Here's my charting of Iowa's running game, with plays Wirfs got graded on in green:

image

That doesn't do it for you? Do you want me to clip like…all of that? Here's a dead donkey:

That's most plays. Wirfs is so strong you wonder if his Ma and Pa are getting nervous the feds will start asking questions about that whole "he's the child of my cousin in North Dakota" story. Like I'm trying to figure out what happened on some of these plays and the best I can tell is Wirfs shoved his center and 1,000 pounds of people get shot out of a cannon.

OVERVIEW:

Brian Ferentz would be OC even if he hadn't gone to Iowa

Either ISU's interior line is really good, or Michigan's lucky that our worst DT situation in a minute is catching the Ferentzians at an even rarer interior OL ebb. If they were having trouble in just this game I'd say it was the weather, but the subtle shift in offensive approach from what they've been since—yeesh…is it 2000?—to this more downhill, shotgun passing thing seems to be a personnel issue. They do rave about the redshirt freshman center, so the most likely explanation is this will sort itself out once that guy is no longer a 280 lb redshirt freshman.

This would have been a good opponent to play before Wisconsin because Iowa does a lot of the same misdirection stuff with inside zone that UW was doing with their "Power GT" play, where they pulled the backside linemen and replaced the OT with a fullback. The rules against Wisconsin are the rules against Iowa: 1) Win the race to set the edge, 2) Hold your ground against doubles, and 3) Fat guys don't lie/don't follow the fullback.

Offensive coordinator Brian Ferentz makes life easy on people writing video analysis articles because when a play works he'll go back to it within a handful of snaps so we can see how to defeat it. Here ISU's LB #42 steps outside with the fullback and gets stuck behind Iowa's #71:

And here's the next play:

Later Iowa tried running out the backside of this with their newest toy, freshman scatback Tyler Goodman. ISU gives him a little space, and he dodges a few guys for a big gain:

Nice trick right? Well play it again Ferentz:

And that's that. Greg Davis may be long retired, but the Iowa offense under Kirk's son/GERG's favorite center is still more machine-like than lethal. They have a philosophy and they stick to it, even if that philosophy means waggling into an unblocked Khaleke Hudson. If an idea comes along they'll try it. MTSU saw three plays from tempo. Not THAT Miami got an RPO. Rutgers saw a pass play that wasn't (just) flags or mesh:

The concern of course is the tackles. I love a great Uche idea as much as the next comrade, but against a great American hero like Tristan Wirfs it's probably best to scrap the gimmicks and have Paye and Hutchinson just get low. Interior pass rush is going to be at a premium. Activating the linebackers could pay off, but remember that's their favorite spot to throw. Best case scenario, Dwumfour is full go and devastating on blitzes. Worst case is our relative weakness is weaker than theirs, and our linebackers are still reacting to a not-great fullback when the fat guys are letting you know exactly where they're going.

READ YOUR GUARDS.

Comments

maize-blue

October 3rd, 2019 at 9:22 AM ^

I still haven't formed a strong opinion on the outcome of this game. I'm hearing similar things as before the Wisconsin game. That they haven't played a strong schedule, they haven't been challenged as much as Michigan, Michigan has more talent on paper, etc.

The one thing they probably learned from the Wisconsin whoopin' is to expect the trenches to be physical. If they are prepared for that aspect then that should set them up better than the debacle in Madison.

The Baughz

October 3rd, 2019 at 12:21 PM ^

My opinion would be Wiscy has better personnel at Oline, RB, WR and secondary.

Id say Iowa is better at QB (marginally), Dline, and probably a wash at LB - with a slight lean towards Wiscy there.

TE-wash? Iowa is tight end U but not this year.

Michigan SHOULD win this game but they have lost quite a few games they should have won.

MGoBlue96

October 3rd, 2019 at 12:12 PM ^

The numbers say there was a dropoff from Taylor though, he averaged 8.8 yards a carry on the day, rest of Wisconsin's RB's averaged 5.6, but the RB with the second most carries at 13 only averaged 2.4 a carry. So obviously UM will have to do better than either 8.8 or 5.6 ypc allowed to beat Iowa, but there was absolutely a dropoff from Taylor.  And Wisky has possibly the best C in the country.

Salinger

October 3rd, 2019 at 9:31 AM ^

This game feels like THE opportunity for Don Brown to show what he can get out of our sub-optimal personnel. 

Light McGrone on fire and see what he can do. 

Activate Dwumfor: GO!

I will start lighting 2 candles and saying 2 prayers for our DTs for the remainder of the week.

Also, please sweet baby Jesus, let Wirfs get struck with a really nasty head cold. Like, he needs a blanket and some Campbell's Chicken Noodle Soup kind of a head cold.

Is it asking too much for a single mother-blinkin' miracle?

BayWolves

October 3rd, 2019 at 9:50 AM ^

Seems hard to judge the outcome of  this game but we know who Iowa is and so do they, just like we knew who Wisconsin was and so did they.  Now if we can just adjust to what we know they are  we might perform better and win.

reshp1

October 3rd, 2019 at 10:29 AM ^

I don't necessarily root against guys that transfer from us, but I gotta admit I get a little bit of satisfaction seeing guys who gave up a relatively decent chance to contribute at Michigan end up in situations that are much worse. 

dragonchild

October 3rd, 2019 at 11:46 AM ^

I'm just baffled at WTF Oliver Martin is doing with his career.  Scouting indicated he was oozing with measurable talent -- 133 SPARQ, excellent hands, and was lauded as a crisp route-runner before stepping onto campus.  He's not on the level of DPJ but was a solid 4-star and should've physically outclassed a majority of B1G starters covering him.  Never mind his transfer; he was buried down the depth chart even when the WRs were depleted with injury, and it looked to me like he wasn't very good at getting open.  I don't know what his story is but it sounds like a lot of talent going to waste.

Seth

October 3rd, 2019 at 12:18 PM ^

I don't pretend to know more about the situation than what was reported by Sam on wtka at the time but I know in general that when you go home in the offseason people get in your ear. "Man you're FIFTH on the depth chart? You would be a God if you stuck around here." It is extremely hard not playing. These guys were superstars in high school and are super competitive. 

reshp1

October 3rd, 2019 at 7:01 PM ^

Plus at the time, it looked for all the world Michigan was going to play 4 receivers every play. Then of course, half our WR corp gets hurt.

 

The Solomon one takes the cake for head scratchers. He was going to play as many snaps as he wanted and gave it up for a bit role on a terrible Tennessee team. 

Pelini's Cat

October 3rd, 2019 at 10:31 AM ^

I think this team may just be Wisconsin lite but i remain optimistic for the simple reason that we’re playing at home. 

I hate to be a dumb guy and do the whole “Michigan is just a different team at home” thing but honestly I don’t think I can deny it anymore. This team just looks far more confident in every game at the big House beyond even the standard +3 points Vegas usually gives for home field advantage. 

dragonchild

October 3rd, 2019 at 11:39 AM ^

Hang on, something's off.  For the second straight week, I've seen the word "Offense" preceded by words like "Rutger" or "Iowa" like the combination means something.

massblue

October 3rd, 2019 at 12:08 PM ^

I have UM winning this game and winning rather comfortably. We are not as bad as the score of Wisc showed and not as good as how we looked again Rutgers.   Our OL will play for the second game with the starters back and our interior DL will actually do well.

UM 27  Iowa 17

Chuck Long Duk Dong

October 3rd, 2019 at 12:13 PM ^

This would have been a good opponent to play before Wisconsin

Iowa fan here. I’ve been thinking the same since that “game” in Madison. if only Iowa could’ve gotten to Michigan before Wisconsin. 

love your spot on analysis Seth, mixed in w/ humor and references I won’t pretend to know. more informed on my own team bc of it. now where can I find a similar self-analysis on Mich?

hajiblue

October 3rd, 2019 at 12:19 PM ^

This would be another good game in which Hinton and Smith should get snaps at DT. Iowa's weak interior line would hopefully mitigate any freshman mistakes. You might as well play them as they will be needed against Penn St., MSU, ND and OSU. You're not going to beat these teams without more depth there. From everything Harbaughs been putting in the media about these two i would take that as a sign of increased playing time on the way.

AlbanyBlue

October 3rd, 2019 at 12:51 PM ^

I come at this a bit differently (big surprise). Seems that Iowa's run game will be successful - maybe not as successful as Wisconsin, but successful. They pass better than in past years.

So, we'll have to score significantly in this one to win. Shea will struggle some reading the cover-2, so the QB runs will have to be a part of the O to keep the chains moving. I hope ZC is healthy as well. I think we need to get to 34 to win.

It's at home, so I think we have a shot here, but I still think Iowa wins. Lots of things will have to go right for us to win.

I'll say 31-24 Iowa.