come at me bro [Marc-Gregor Campredon]

Basketbullets: Zero To Sixty Edition Comment Count

Brian December 9th, 2019 at 1:09 PM

Podcast apologies. I had a family issue and Ace is dealing with a severe allergic reaction, so there's no podcast today. Back at it next week. Silver lining: text content will be novel instead of also on the podcast.

The whiplash game. An alien observer given an oversized baseball hat, trench coat, inconspicuous sunglasses, and tickets to Michigan's two most recent basketball games must think he watched two different sports. One is a game of furrowed brows and vicious close-quarters fighting in which shots are precious and points even more so. The second is superficially similar to the first, but apparently has dozens of subtle rule changes that make it impossible to defend anything. Also your worth as a player is directly correlated with the size of your eyebrows.

I wonder if there's ever been a bigger game-to-game swing in Michigan's offense than going from 0.65 PPP to 1.39. If it's been exceeded it's not by much.

49180904332_6955b272d7_k

ope just gonna grab this from you for a sec [Campredon]

Johns: hello. One game after I asserted Michigan hadn't changed anything from John Beilein's OREB approach Brandon Johns swoops in for five OREBs and Michigan grabs 44% of its rare misses. Johns also swished a couple corner threes en route to 12 points on seven shot equivalents. Also he had a nice assist to Davis.

That's a breakout performance, and now we're waiting to see if that lasts. It prompted an Athletic article from Brendan Quinn detailing Johns's confidence issues:

“It was a huge problem,” Johns said Friday night, arms folded, standing in the Crisler Center lobby. “It was kind of heartbreaking because people would say how good I am, but I just didn’t see it. I never saw it. I never believed in myself like that.”

When it comes to former top-50 recruits such as Johns, the issue usually comes from the opposite direction. They’re convinced they’re good and need to be broken down. Johns, after a freshman year spent lost in a playbook, confused on the floor and fledgling outside the rotation, was the converse. The picture didn’t fit the frame. He needed to be reminded of who he is and what he can do. He needed to be reminded that he’s 6 feet, 8 inches and 235 pounds of potential. He needed to be told that he’s an elite athlete who can do things others can only dream of.

Johns doesn't have to do a lot more than bring a Mitch McGary vibe and hit open shots to make a big difference as Michigan's primary bench guy at the 3 and 4.

[After THE JUMP: it's raining points]

Are we ready to call open Simpson threes good shots? I think I am.

He's 10/23 to start and while the shot is still a little odd it gets off quicker. Simpson's more comfortable in catch and shoot situations. He's never going to rise up when he's checked; he may have established that going under a screen is not a great idea.

Got a plan for zones. Michigan shredded Iowa's zone. You can chalk up that to "played Iowa," and that's fair. I still think there's a qualitative difference between Michigan's prep level against zones this year and how it was under Beilein. This Johns dunk stood out in particular:

Michigan has two cutters for Teske to choose from there. Livers is also flashing to the basket. McCaffrey's got a guy who needs checking who he can see, so he bites on that action and Michigan gets an easy baseline dunk.

image

Livers even has the "I'm open!" hand up.

The ways in which Michigan opened Iowa's zone were diverse and practiced; later Teske got a layup after a play on which four Michigan players touched the ball, with the threat of a Livers jumper off a DDJ pass opening up the space for Teske. You can say Iowa has a bad defense and I can say that crappy zones have long frustrated Michigan no matter who throws them out.

My default assumption is that most or all zone stuff is from Phil Martelli's brain, and that it's an easy way to see Howard's willingness to hire a guy like him pay off.

Re-learning the tempo lesson. The most frustrating part of Garza's output was the early duck-in stuff that used to burn Michigan against Michigan State. Michigan would get a bucket, because they always got a bucket, and then Iowa would zip down the floor and establish deep post position before Michigan could get set.

This style of play creates an interesting gap between Synergy and Hoop-Math numbers. Synergy, which is done by hand and files plays into bins based on what kind of play just happened, recorded just 10 transition opportunities for Iowa. Hoop-Math, which calls any shot in the first ten seconds of the clock "transition," has 28(!) FGAs in that bin.

Hoop-Math is spiritually correct in this instance. If "transition" is supposed to indicate a good shot gotten because you're getting it off fast, well:

image

There was a 23-point gap in Iowa eFG after makes between quick stuff and Michigan's set half-court defense, and somewhat incredibly over a quarter of Iowa FGA were in quasi-transition off of makes. Garza got 5 of his 13 makes at the rim in quasi-transition. That wasn't all of his game—he was an all-around offensive beast—but his volume gets a lot more acceptable if Michigan is better at recovering to defensive position.

The other frustrating part of this approach is that the director came straight from the Indiana #chaosteam era. He'd be showing closeups of the guy who just hit a shot as important basketball things were going on. He cut to one Livers three with it already in the air. Cumong man.

Anyway: Michigan got a wake-up call or three from MSU when they were doing this a few years ago and got it fixed. Hopefully they manage that again.

49180682776_c31173406f_k

[Campredon]

Franzwatch. Wagner had his most assertive offensive outing on Friday, finishing with 18 points thanks in large part to 10 FTAs. He earned eight of those on drives or cuts to the basket. Prior to the season I sold him as a guy who might attack some closeouts but wasn't likely to generate a ton of his own shots. Early indications are he's farther down the Stauskas path than I thought. Every game you see the potential, and it's beginning to translate a bit.

Franz also picked up a steal by anticipating Iowa's tempo post up. So far his defensive performance has been the occasional ugly blow-by marring otherwise quality D:

He got posted once but the other shots hit against his on-ball defense were both tough fadeaways.

Get his shooting back to last year's levels and gradual all-around improvement should get him to a star level, although that's probably more a year two or three thing.

Small margins. A number of people looked at Michigan's four factors profile and worried that once the shooting slowed down the other three—at that point all below-average—would bog Michigan down. Fast forward a week and Michigan has cracked the top 100 in TO rate at #90. This is because Michigan's put together a few low-TO games (Gonzaga: 15.7 TO rate; UNC: 15.2; Iowa: 12.1) but also it's because the margins in the middle of the pack are so thin. For example: if Michigan averaged ~1 extra turnover per game they'd be about 75 slots lower.

Once you get to Beilein levels where you're top 10 every year then you're talking about multiple possessions per game. Being in the broad middle means you get talked about a lot differently depending on where exactly you fall, despite the actual differences being minimal.

49180888822_cb59500cee_k

the first Howard ref face was incredible [Campredon]

Great job, Terry. This game would probably have been a 20-point demolition if you flip two obvious calls. One was Colin Castleton getting hammered so hard by Garza that he started bleeding on the court. The other was Teske getting a phantom call when fighting for post position. Castleton missed several minutes of game time getting his face put back together, so instead of the end of the first half being a Teske-Kriener matchup it was Garza-Davis. Also Castleton bent over—because he was bleeding—so instead of Livers saving the ball to him on an OREB Iowa got a 5-on-3 transition opportunity they converted.

They went to the monitor! I cannot get over the fact that the referees went to the monitor, watched Garza club Castleton in the face, and didn't bother calling a flagrant. After the stuff we've seen called flagrant this year, the mind boggles.

The above shot isn't from that incident but rather the offensive rebound that was temporarily removed because the officials missed a shot very obviously hitting the rim. Howard's kept his referee demeanor impressively even-keel so far but that was a bridge too far, and it was amazing. Strong Uncle Phil vibes.

They did get that other one right. The foul on Garza that got reversed into a hook and hold on Davis was correct. Unfortunate, too, as Davis had pushed Garza under the basket and was likely to get an offensive rebound without the arm grab.

Also Garza did eat a preposterous blocking call with about 3 minutes left.

49180895042_d5f9dbd310_k

[Campredon]

Blocking shots just isn't working out for us. Second straight game in which Michigan has blocked a shot only for it to go directly to the guy who just got packed so he can score a bunny. Brooks also blocked an attempted Toussaint meep-meep shot only for Garza to get it for an and one. That's four incidents in the last couple games in which a clean block has backfired into an easy score.

49180690116_4dd9521da0_k

[Campredon]

Weird guy sighting. Davis did decently for himself in his 10 minutes. An elbow jumper was a bad idea. Simpson threw him an alley-oop that either of Michigan's other bigs likely converts; it went over Davis's reach. Otherwise, eh, not bad. He had a couple of offensive rebounds. He was able to turn and finish off a nice high-low play between himself and Johns, and then there were back-to-back dunks in the second half. Davis singlehandedly crested the E-Line.

Davis has 32 possessions against high-major opponents and while the sample size here is ridiculously small, Michigan hasn't gotten killed on them.

image

Obviously Michigan is not 0.16 PPP better with Davis on the floor, but maybe this is a sign that he's a viable emergency guy.

E-Line check in. Appalachian State remains the only team to crest the E-Line on Michigan this year. Iowa was 0/1 on dunks, with Ryan Kriener missing a contested one.

Comments

Mgthefrenchy

December 9th, 2019 at 1:19 PM ^

I really enjoyed seeing Johns making a great game.
With DDJ and Casselton that team rotation start to really look solid.

Speaking of the obvious call - One the second one it was so awful that Martelli came out of the bench and really actively called on the ref'. It was amusing because of his usual behavior - He really sat and let Juwan being the head coach but clearly on that call he could not let it go.

I am also having such an amazing time looking at Juwan Howard - He is already evolving in his behavior on the bench (More photos op!)

Alumnus93

December 9th, 2019 at 1:44 PM ^

I just watched a tape of the game last night, and was surprised I hadn't read anything about Wagner's tomahawk jam attempt...he ran into a body, and is adjusting to the American game, but man that was sweet to see him elevate and go strong to rim.  For those who didn't notice it it was in second half and Brooks drove to the right and hit Wagner sweeping in.  That aggressive attempt impressed the heck out of me.  How is it that I didn't see it mentioned.  

And regarding Johns breakout...not surprising he had a inferior complex as one can imagine coming from EL and all the shit he got for coming here.  He is a thumper and is an elite athlete... I see three elite athletes on team right now in Johns, Livers, and Wagner.  

And I had a random thought watching the bench last night... Both Howard and Eisely are big guys, bigger than anyone we have it seems at their position, and it hit me how elite physically the Fab Five were. Liver is the closest thing I've seen to that athletic ability in the Bielein era,and it's still a big step below....

And ponder this ....how cool must it be to be a player, and know you have coaches in practice knowing that if they played pickup game with them that theyre better than the players themselves, even at 45. 

Joby

December 9th, 2019 at 7:09 PM ^

I disagree with a few items here. First, I’m not sure that a missed tomahawk from a 6’9” guy is that worthy of comment. I do agree with you that Wagner appears to have good athleticism, as does Johns. 

 

Eisley is not a big guy; he was a 6’2”, 185 lb. point guard as a player. Neither he nor Howard were known for elite athleticism, at least as pros, but they were both savvy players. Webber was a different story. The closest comparable playing style to Howard is Tim Duncan. Howard was a finesse player who relied on sound fundamentals, footwork and game IQ more than out-athleting the competition. He probably had the fewest dunks out of any Fab Five member. It’s probably their savvy and intelligence that’s allowing them to be such effective coaches.

AC1997

December 9th, 2019 at 1:45 PM ^

Perhaps it is just me, but none of the links worked.  They all take me to the first half of the game in full, starting before the tip.  Not sure what's up with that.

Overall I liked your summary a lot and I somehow can't believe that no one has dunked on Michigan.  How is that possible?  There are a few things I don't quite agree with though:

  • On the lob to Davis, I think you're giving a lot of credit to the other two guys.  Maybe they are able to keep it in bounds, but I don't think either converts the alley-oop.  
  • The Garza slap to the face of Castleton should have been a foul, but don't think it was a flagrant.  
  • The miss on the shot clock violation was really bad because we got the O-Reb and had the ball in a chaotic situation instead of starting from a set defense when they went to the monitor.  
  • We've given Garza a lot of grief in his career (mostly deserved) so I think the fact that we just witnessed the first 44 point game against us in eons deserves a tip of the cap to him.  The set-D is a good find as a caveat to his success, but that dude just didn't miss.  Never thought I'd see the day where he put up 40+ against anyone.  

TrueBlue2003

December 9th, 2019 at 2:04 PM ^

1. This Iowa game was an incredible test of this staff's resolve to not give up threes and they did not budge.   They simply refused to double Garza to stick with three point shooters.  I think Iowa had only attempted like 9 threes before the last couple minutes of chuck-it-up time which is astounding. 

I'll be curious to see if Michigan changes the approach a little in Iowa City.   It really didn't work all that well given Iowa scored a whopping 1.21 ppp.  Maybe they stuck with it because they were up most of the game, were scoring at will and were happy to give up a steady stream of twos instead of risking a streak of threes.

Michigan was a bit fortunate to have scorched the nets and if that's not happening in Iowa City, they'd be wise to come in prepared to bring selective doubles to Garza and hope to recover on shooters / get some missed threes.

I feel like that extreme of an approach might not be optimal with the deeper 3 point line (but would have made more sense last year).

2. I think Johns "breakout" was largely opponent driven.  Iowa is horrific on defense and gives up a bunch of rebounds which allowed him to thrive.  That said, he's clearly talented and physically gifted and it's partially a confidence issue with him (as it was with Brooks last year). Hopefully, this confidence carries over against tougher opponents.

3. Along those lines, the OREBs in this game were largely a result of Iowa playing a zone which tends to give up OREBs easily.  I do like that Michigan got more aggressive on the boards against the zone, which makes it tough for defenders to turn and box out the guy they're guarding but I don't think this signals a change in approach against man teams.

umchicago

December 9th, 2019 at 5:06 PM ^

ya, i was complaining that we didn't double down on garza after a while.  it's not like iowa had 4 good 3 pt shooters out there.  they maybe have 2.  i would have doubled down quite a bit with the guys defending the two worst iowa shooters on the floor.

at least try it for a while.  you can always go back to the isolation D.

victors2000

December 9th, 2019 at 2:08 PM ^

This team is legit. They are all getting better and better game by game. The Louisville game was an outlier, a perfect storm of unfortunate circumstances. In the wake of the continuing Ohio State situation its refreshing to have at least one sport where we can legitimately do it right and have a decent chance to go all the way.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

December 9th, 2019 at 2:13 PM ^

Having watched UVA systematically dismantle the Syracuse zone for years now, it looks awfully similar to that baseline-cut-for-dunk screenshot.  Having a dangerman at the foul line is key because the zone doesn't quite know what to do with him.  UVA would put De'Andre Hunter there last year and it was like free points all the time.  Do you play up on him?  Do you help from outside?  Do you sag and let him shoot jumpers?  All bad ideas.  Teske driving at the rim would be more of a bullrush, or even a straight post-up, rather than putting a Porsche into gear, but it's still a nasty thing to do to a zone.  He's too good a passer and jump shooter.

yossarians tree

December 9th, 2019 at 2:18 PM ^

Johns was a superstar in high school. Some guys have a tough time making the mental leap when moving up a level. I think what's helping Johns is that he became determined to become an elite defender and rebounder. 90% of that is simply hard work and intensity. That gets him into the game mentally and frees him up a little more on the offensive end.

outsidethebox

December 9th, 2019 at 4:20 PM ^

Brandon is, indeed, a nice physically gifted athlete. But I remember being very concerned about his transition to college ball-from watching his HS tape. His HS coach clearly allowed him to simply get by on his superior athleticism-especially defensively. He was bigger, stronger and faster so he just wandered around-stayed close enough to the man he was guarding to block or alter shots...didn't box out-simply out-jumped and out-muscled for rebounds. That isn't even a workable strategy for friggin Lebron or Michael as you move up in the level of play. There's likely both maturity and coaching that is kicking in here...but very good to see improvement...because if this kid starts playing this team will keep ascending.   

4godkingandwol…

December 9th, 2019 at 2:21 PM ^

That only 1 team out of the quality schedule we’ve faced today has dunked on us has to be the most surprising stat of the year. I’d bet more money on us being 8-1 than on the one dunk thing. And that cake from Elon. Crazy. 

spiff

December 9th, 2019 at 3:32 PM ^

The Franz defensive film was good to see. I think it shows not only a guy who has probably has a great innate sense of the game, but also someone who has come up through the European developmental system as opposed to AAU ball. Watching film on prospects over the years and seeing what passes for defense....I'm guessing there isn't a lot of focus on solid defensive principles during those tournaments.

champswest

December 9th, 2019 at 3:33 PM ^

Great to see Davis have a big game. He has put in his time.

Also, if we whiff on Dickinson, we better hope that we can talk Austin into sticking around for his 5th year. I wouldn’t mind having him here even if Dickinson comes.

rice4114

December 9th, 2019 at 4:03 PM ^

Here is a question for the old mailbag. Looking at this game and the game last year vs Western if memory serves? We play these teams that go against our best defender (Simpson, Teske) and then they triple their normal shot attempts to put up career highs. I'm so confused how this is a thing. Top 5 PG defender or top 5 C defender and you triple your usual shot attempts? Is it just doubling down on our BPONE "Why yes of course expect a career game vs Michigans top defender in the history of the program at that position". Its very interesting to say the least.

Luke15

December 9th, 2019 at 4:03 PM ^

Terry Wymer is the basketball equivalent of John O'Neill for us in the B10. He supplanted Gene Steratore when it comes to most cringe-worthy when you see him officiate one of our games.

Never forget that in the 2018 Nat Championship game he called Michigan for 9 fouls in an 8-minute stretch from the 12:06 point in the first half until 4:07. (Compared to Villanova getting called for 3 fouls in those 8 minutes) Michigan had a 7-point lead (21-14) which turned into a 9-point deficit by the end of the half (28-37). Michigan lost all rhythm as well as any momentum they came out with at the start.

Terry Wymer also officiated that horribly out-of-sync grinder game that we won against Houston in the same 2018 tourney on the miraculous Jordan Poole buzzer beater. Despite Michigan being ranked #26 in least amount of fouls per game and Houston being ranked #328 that year (2017-2018), we still managed to out-foul them 22-19.

Terry Wymer is from the state of Ohio, is a member of the Ohio basketball Hall of Fame (https://ohiobasketballhalloffame.com/hall-of-fame/inductees/2018/terry-wymer.html) and had several run-in's with Beilein that were well-documented.

Officiating sways games.

rice4114

December 9th, 2019 at 4:07 PM ^

Absolutely. I promise you I could throw every game in which two closely matched teams were playing. You simply call 8 fouls in the first 10 minutes one way and 2 the other. Do it both halves and you are looking at 10-15 more FT attempts for the game. Nobody would bat an eye.

bronxblue

December 9th, 2019 at 4:29 PM ^

Wagner being more physical at the rim, if it holds, is a welcome addition for this offense.

As for Johns, it does feel like he's ready to break out.  His athleticism is clear and Howard seems like the type of guy who knows how to harness it.  Excited to see him these next couple of games.

LKLIII

December 9th, 2019 at 4:39 PM ^

Exclusive locker-room video of Juwan Howard & Phil Martelli talking to Brandon Johns Jr. immediately before the Iowa game:

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUa2atNxhfg

 

SoccerDancer

December 10th, 2019 at 2:06 AM ^

Specific topic I'm curious, is exactly how deep can our bench reliably get?  15 on the team.  Something that strikes me is that JH seems to be making active conscious concerted effort to rotate as deep as he can go. Through the years you can see how a deep bench helps, especially in the grind of March madness. Never got the feel from JB that it was necessarily a primary 'goal' to deepen the bench experience. More a function of circumstance and if he had players he trusted he'd play them, but this feels different. This feels like a coach actively working explicitly to deepen his bench.  Can we turn this into a fully functioning 15 deep bench? Yes I know 15 isn't realistic, and would we even necessarily 'want' all 15 playing every game? This is more for for a broader discussion of what everyone 'wants' to see and what they think we 'can' see ... any thoughts out there?

 

DMZBlue

December 10th, 2019 at 2:42 PM ^

Had the exact same thoughts re: UM's zone offense, but they've shown it in other games this year as well, not just Iowa.  

Having Simpson as a legitimate 3-point option and Wagner vice Matthews helps, but they've been well organized and are attacking it aggressively whereas in previous years, they looked completely lost. 

Also agree this is likely Martelli's doing as zones in the NBA are infrequent to the point of being a novelty due to the defensive rules.

classof1999

December 12th, 2019 at 7:00 PM ^

How do you get LIVERS more involved in the half court offense?  Use him as the screener in the SIMPSON/TESKE pick and roll offense.  I love TESKE, but LIVERS isn't getting nearly enough touches.