Time to search for TruTV thread
Apparently Cox in North Florida requires an extra package for TruTV?? Nope. Thank god for internet streams!
March 13th, 2018 at 10:51 PM ^
sounds dirty
Just download the March Madness Live app.
Just saw this on my firestick. No CBS though. Just a head's up.
That's for work time. I'm at home. I can watch basketball on a real TV.
He is a nice player
(Is anyone else watching this game?)
Yes. LIU needs to stop jacking up terrible threes or this will get ugly.
He's a polite man. I'm sure his mother is proud.
Does anyone ever watch trutv other then 6 days in March?
ly no.
The Carbonaro Effect is a light, entertaining reality show on Tru TV.
I LOVE Impractical Jokers!!!
KIDDING! Those asshats are so terrible and what's wrong with...everything about everything. Goddammit they suuuuuuckkkkk
I can root against UCLA now that it doesn’t effect our resume anymore Go Bonny!
Why won’t LIU stop jacking up threes?
I do like Inpractical Jokers but haven’t watched in a while.
I just checked ESPN. Louisville did show up. 3 minutes left in first quarter. Weird.
Did they go to a commercial right after the punt?
I can't say for sure, but it looks like they are replacing four TV timeouts per half with 3. This is a change I can support. Also, the elimination of the 1 and 1 bonus would have helped us this year.
just got directv now. thankfully and surprising trutv is included
pawnstars!-(
March 13th, 2018 at 10:05 PM ^
You can't login to the march Madness App with DTVNow. I know the channels are there but the app just makes it more convenient. They advertise DTVNow hard on the app too.
Play in games are dumb.
But if they are going to have 4 games, I'd rather see the worst 8 teams play the play-in games. Just have 4 16-17 seed games.
Define worst
The opposite of the best? I don't like them having 6 16 seeds and 6 11 seeds. If you are seeded 11th, you should not be punished by having to play an extra game. 12 is worse than 11. 13 is worse than 12. Eventually you get to 8 bad 16 seeds.
I also like the idea of giving those awful teams the play in game so that they have something to play for. Otherwise, they are just a sacrificial lamb. I don't like giving them an advantage over a real team that has to play the play in game. If they don't like it, drop down a division. Teams that are in the bottom 100 or so are not really the same caliber and should not be stealing NCAA tournament money from the schools that are earning the money.
March 13th, 2018 at 10:13 PM ^
It keeps the NIT with at least 2 17 seeds. Otherwise the NIT's #1's would be 19 seeds.
It's also available on YouTube TV, unfortunately the price for subscription just went up to $40. They do have a one week free trial, might be useful for the week, and then cancel.
Time to find out if Youtube TV even carries it.
Edit: Don't worry guys. They do.
Having these teams in the tournament just doesn't make any sense.
A 16 seed has literally never won a tournament game.
Give me 4 more teams that would actually stand a chance to win a game in the round of 64
I agree with you. However, it wouldn’t be as exciting to watch Louisville upset Xavier. What is March madness without Cinderella?
A 16 seed has literally never won a tournament game. Give me 4 more teams that would actually stand a chance to win a game in the round of 64
How do you have a 64-team tournament without teams seeded 16th?
Nah man, they are winners of D1 conferences or conference tournaments. Unless you want to relegate their conferences to D2, they should get their chance.
I don’t think any team that won their conference should be a 16 seed...
I was just thinking about this, but with a different slant. If you earned an automatic bid you should not be in any of the 4 play in games. No chance in hell. You earned it to make the actual field. Only at large bids that were on the bubble should play these games
Exactly reserve all the 12 seed lots for the last at-large bids and have them play on Tuesday and Wednesday. These smaller conference teams earned their ticket into the field of 64.
Not really possible to predefine the seeds for the play-in games like that. The amount of automatic qualifiers who would otherwise not make it varies every year, so your play-in game seeds would have to vary as well.
That being said, I agree with your point. Let the 16s in and make the bubble teams play the extra game.
This is my stance. I know people want to see better games and I agree with that, but this is the format and honestly part of what makes March fun and different. These guys earned their bid, let them play over the weekend. Let the Syracuses and Arizona States and Nebraskas of the world sweat and play these Tuesday night games. These teams had plenty of time to build a resume. If they can't build a strong enough one, the mid-major and majors who were the last 8 at-large bids should be playing for the last 4 spots.
Vcu ....
Go BobLanier U!
how the most storied program in NCAA Division I college basketball history was selected to participate in a play in game. Either be good enough to start playing Thursday or Friday or stay home. Play in games should be for non-Power 5 programs.
Can you see John Wooden coaching in a play in game?
Juice ratings. Need like a big name
posting cause i need point so I can neg people in othe threads
Wow, UCLA sucks.
UCLA turnover situation is a hot mess
to feel that Steve Alford has a very punchable face?
Well he has the same haircut, so
March 13th, 2018 at 10:02 PM ^
As shown below, slightly less feathered today.
March 13th, 2018 at 10:01 PM ^
It was slightly more punchable with 1980's feathered hair on top, but your point still holds.