OT(?) - Louisville sex scandal investigation

Submitted by samber2009 on

There was a bit of news about this a few weeks ago, but OTL is breaking this morning the extent of went on between 2010-2014.  Five ex-players and recruits speaking on the coniditon of anonymity. Looks really bad. Mike and Mike referencing on-campus parties with strippers, stacks of money, and sex with escorts payed for by a graduate assistant.

Link 

 

 

mGrowOld

October 20th, 2015 at 8:51 AM ^

That was my thought exactly.  The money trail is going to implicate Pitino IMO as the grad assistant was wiring funds to these "ladies" to pay for their services.  I'm assuming the dollars came from his expense account and somebody had to sign-off on the expense for accounting to reimburse him or cut the check to get him cash.

Who signs off on a grad assistant's expense account?  That's the guy who has to be sweating bullets this morning.

Ghost of Hoke

October 20th, 2015 at 9:22 AM ^

The money wasn't coming from his expense account. They're not that dumb. It was clearly coming from a big time booster. It's extremely possible that Rick was involved but it's also possible they had a rogue booster and a willing McGee. Sounds like the whole thing probably cost 50k that's not a bad investment from a millionaire who wants to see his team win.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Mr Miggle

October 20th, 2015 at 10:31 AM ^

I recall another coach who tried to explain why he kept thousands in cash in his desk. In this case, it wll probably be someone else on staff, not Pitino. Either way, there won't be a paper trail documenting how it got there.

redfirelx

October 20th, 2015 at 8:48 AM ^

I'd rather have lost that NC game with John "we had subs, it was crazy" Beilein, who runs a squeaky clean program as far as we can tell than have to take down banners due to someone like Patino and these end results.

Sad part is if UL takes down that NC banner, we don't get it... vacated wins aren't forfeits, sigh.

Everyone Murders

October 20th, 2015 at 9:11 AM ^

The problem with retroactive forfeits is that they jigger the overall and league records of the non-cheating (or not caught!) institutions.  That could impact championship claims, etc., that are probably best left intact unless the cheating institution wins a championship.

Maybe the answer would be to have two season records - one the "official" or "locked" league standings record, and one the "corrected" record with asterisks.  Because your core idea is very appealing:  the school on the other side of the cheater should be getting a W, so long as they're not also shown to have been cheating. 

Everyone Murders

October 20th, 2015 at 10:58 AM ^

In the instance of the 2013 NCAA MBB championship, it seems like the championship could slide to Michigan.  And I'd have no problem displaying it at Crisler.  (It would mess things up on the other side of the bracket, but so be it.  Better than vacating the title and pretending like 65 other teams did not play their hearts out trying to win the title.

Sort of like when the TdF riders get busted for PEDs, and they post facto award the championship to the next "clean" rider. 

GGV

October 20th, 2015 at 9:00 AM ^

We could, perhaps, simply unilaterally clam the title if it were vacated.  No one would "officially" be champion from that year, but IIRC, many schools to this retroactively for football national championships where the official results are ambiguous.

matty blue

October 20th, 2015 at 10:59 AM ^

yes, i think we can safely say that the chair of the ncaa ethics committee probably runs a pretty clean program.  not that an ncaa stamp of approval means jack doody, but still.  pretty sure you will not find a cleaner coach in the country.

1201SouthMain

October 20th, 2015 at 12:38 PM ^

in basketball because of another program cheating, is a headline that I could live without.  Not to mention, every time that championship is referenced it comes with the asterick that it was a forfeited championship.  Not the kind of championship I'm looking for.

M-Dog

October 21st, 2015 at 8:24 AM ^

Why would they do this?  They don't know anything about these guys.  Aren't they afraid of getting some kind of disease?

They certainly can't be niave enough to think they are somehow going to latch on to a future NBA player by sleeping with a high school kid on one of his several recruiting trips.

If he sleeps with you, a random girl, on a recruiting trip, he ain't marrying you.

 

Stay.Classy.An…

October 20th, 2015 at 8:54 AM ^

Anything not Michigan sports related or anything not referencing Michigan at all, is OT. Then again, the OT rule only seems to apply when the Mods want to enforce it. Anyways, I digress.

Obviously Pitino knew about this the whole time. I'm not judging the man, but this is the same guy that was having an affair with a waitress...this whole situation never seemed like a stretch to me. Say what you want about the four letter, but they make sure to have all their ducks in a row before breaking major news. I can't remember a situation they have ever been wrong or incorrectly informed on....