Kneel formation fake play

Submitted by S5R48S10 on

In last night's Purdue vs Arizona game, the Boilermakers had the ball in their territory with ~1 minute until halftime and a 14-point lead.  They lined up in a "safe" formation, typically used for kneeling the ball and running out the clock.  They then ran a fake, advancing well into Arizona territory on a play where most of the defense stood still at the snap.

Is this a saavy move by an up-and-coming coach that shows you never stop competing, as the media suggested?  Or has he compromised the integrity of a mutual concession to run out the clock?  Having seen it, I would have no problem with any DL blowing up Purdue's OL on an actual kneel.   

Maybe someone would be kind enough to embed a video for me.  

Clarence Boddicker

December 28th, 2017 at 2:38 PM ^

I was at Michigan Stadium with a group for the Wisconsin game--near the ignominious end. We were in the student section as usual but it was invaded by Badgers that Michigan students had sold their tickets to. Just in front of us, this girl yelled "On, Wisconsin!' after every Badger first down. The Badgers had a LOT of first downs. Terrible stuff.

Thanks for the memories, RichRod

ScottyP

December 28th, 2017 at 9:08 AM ^

This play eventually lead to 3 points, they won by three points. Totally fine with it, whatever it takes.

 

On a side note, what is up with Purdue's D-coordinator, is that dude on roids or what?

Evil Empire

December 28th, 2017 at 11:16 AM ^

without sound, so I didn't get the back story.  During games I exchange texts with two buddies from MoJo days and asked them "who is the 80s movie villain on the Purdue sideline?"

Michigan is unstoppable at Samuel's birthday parties.  He is nine and I have watched Michigan beat Notre Dame twice (both Rich Rod wins) and the Colorado and Purdue games from the past two seasons.  Those first two were particularly delicious given the bevy of Catholic OSU fans and one now-BIL who's a Notre Dame fan in attendance.

Micah_J_D

December 28th, 2017 at 9:11 AM ^

RR said that the officials told Arizona players not to rush because Purdue was kneeling. RR felt the play should not have counted because of that. I agree with RR. The officials helped Purdue on that play, unintentionally, but that doesn't matter.

 

That play is going to change how kneeling at the end of halfs is dealt with by defenses in the future.

The Pope

December 28th, 2017 at 10:17 AM ^

With all the emphasis on player safety the kneel down is kind of a big deal. Purdue is going to get blown the fuck up from here on out. Brohm is putting his own players at risk for 3 points in a meaningless bowl game. Actually, it's Purdue, so this game probably means a lot. Broom was probably throwing more furniture before the game. Brohm is an ass clown coach at an ass clown program that doesn't give a shit about player safety.

Brianj25

December 29th, 2017 at 1:54 AM ^

Why don't both teams just stipulate to go to halftime and skip the pointless snap-and-kneel? 

The defense should play football and they should take advice from their coaches, not the referees. 

 

ska4punkkid

December 28th, 2017 at 1:34 PM ^

"blowing up a kneel down" means diving at the O-lines knees. Some teams may do this at the end of a game out of frustration or to somehow knock the ball loose during the snap - one last desperation effort. Most of the time in kneel down situations other than end of game, the defense will still push into the line, but not dive at the knees. Player safety is not an issue here, have your guys play the snap as they normally would and it's fine.

Micah_J_D

December 28th, 2017 at 9:47 AM ^

Obviously the play was legal. But when the referees with their yellow flags and 15 yard penalities tell the players not to do something, usually the players are going to listen. If a player gets flagged for doing something the refs had told him not to do, people would be taking shots at the player for being an idiot and not listening to the refs.

MGoBender

December 28th, 2017 at 10:17 AM ^

I don't know if I believe Rich Rod here.  If anything, I'd expect the Purdue coaches to tell the officials that they might run this so that the officials don't blow the whistle early. In which case, the officials aren't going to tell the opposing team to let up.  Who knows, though.

Evil Empire

December 28th, 2017 at 11:21 AM ^

for the number of games in which he and his team are caught unaware by Purdue's aggression.  Giving up 48 points in 2008 when trying to install a new defense in a week, giving up 28 in the second half the next year and getting punked by Danny Hope and his handshaking pugilist lineman the next year, now this.  Preparation and situational awareness: D.

Goggles Paisano

December 28th, 2017 at 9:12 AM ^

It was a bullshit play IMO.  It seems like "intent to deceive" to me.  If Arizona lines up and fires off the ball, they take a ton of shit and deservedly so, just like Schiano did when he was coaching Tampa Bay.

  

Firstbase

December 28th, 2017 at 10:21 AM ^

...the entire notion that "intent to deceive" as a penalty seems specious. I mean, isn't that what offenses are supposed to do? Every game offenses change alignments and looks in an attempt to trick the opposing defense. As long as you follow the basic alignment and motion rules, I say trickery is all good. 

Where do you draw the line?? Are fake punts now a problem? Certainly there is intent to deceive if you run a fake punt. 

I just don't see the "intent to deceive" penalty as plausible. I didn't even know it was a thing until Harbaugh was called for it. 

Goggles Paisano

December 29th, 2017 at 5:54 AM ^

I didn't know it was a penalty either and I find the rule to be silly.  I agree with you that it is the purpose of the offense to deceive the defense.  In this case however, this crosses over the "unwritten rule" "sportsmanship"  "player safety" ideals of sport.  If you don't want your OL submarined from here on out when you line up to take a knee, then don't run this play.   If you are going to have a silly intent to deceive rule, then this to me is one of or the most blatant plays you can create that deceive as it now becomes a player safety issue going forward.   

corundum

December 28th, 2017 at 9:18 AM ^

Ok, but there was no substitution and the guy they were hiding was in plain sight right next to the QB. The penalty on Michigan was total bullshit but this is still a bit different than intent to deceive. If Sindelar doesn't motion to kneel after the snap (pretty sure he just pauses for a half second), this can basically be seen as just a tight formation.