Michigan 36, Cincinnati 14 Comment Count

Ace


[Bryan Fuller]

Michigan's home opener was supposed to look a lot like last year's Rutgers game. Instead, it more closely resembled last week's Florida game. While that was perfectly fine against a talented UF squad, it was far less so against an overmatched Cincinnati team that barely squeaked by Austin Peay last week.

The game began as expected. Ty Isaac churned out yards with ease, setting up a 43-yard Wilton Speight touchdown bomb to a wide open Kekoa Crawford on the opening drive. The defense held up its end, booting Cincinnati off the field in three plays. While the Wolverines went three-and-out on their ensuing drive, Tyree Kinnel got them back on track, picking off an overthrow from UC's Hayden Moore and diving into the end zone for a 28-yard pick-six.

Then things started going sideways. A short punt by the Bearcats bounced off Nate Johnson's leg, giving Cincinnati a first down on the Michigan 38-yard line. After a penalty kept the drive alive, Mike Boone squeezed his way in from a yard out for the first touchdown scored against the M defense this season. The next Wolverine drive stalled in the red zone, and Quinn Nordin's 28-yard field goal opened one of the uglier quarters Michigan has played under Jim Harbaugh.

Seemingly nothing could go right on offense in the second quarter. Speight fumbled a jet sweep handoff to Crawford to kill a promising drive. Tarik Black ran what, on review, turned out to be an 11-yard route on third-and-12 to end the next one. Speight winged a couple passes high, evoking bad memories of last week's second quarter.

Michigan didn't get a first-half point after Nordin's field goal with 14:03 left. The defense didn't give up any, either, but only after an interminable final drive by Cincinnati resulted in a 51-yard field goal sailing wide right. As the team ran into the tunnel, the fans were audibly displeased with the 17-7 halftime lead.


[Eric Upchurch]

The grumbling continued into the third quarter as Cincinnati took the kickoff and marched 85 yards in ten plays to cut the lead to three points. Michigan's next two drives went nowhere. What had been an annoyingly close game was becoming a potential nightmare.

Thankfully, Michigan woke up. With 3:01 left in the third quarter, Speight hit Grant Perry in stride on a crossing route, and Perry jetted through the Bearcats secondary and dove in for a 33-yard touchdown. Cincinnati could only threaten to score after that. Michigan's offense, meanwhile, piggybacked off some excellent running by Isaac to drive for a short Quinn Nordin field goal midway through the fourth quarter.

Luke Fickell handled the rest. On fourth-and-two from the Cincinnati 33, down two scores with seven minutes remaining, he called for the punt team. One yakety snap later, Michigan had a safety and the ball back, and the potential nightmare was over. The next UC drive ended after one play when Lavert Hill cut off a Moore pass, reversed field, and slipped inside the pylon for M's second defensive touchdown of the afternoon.

By pure box score standards, this game turned out well. Michigan outgained Cincinnati 414-200, dominated the ground game, and kept Moore under constant pressure. Speight, for all the complaining, completed 17-of-29 passes for 221 yards, two touchdowns, and no picks. Isaac seemingly cemented himself as the lead back with a 20-carry, 137-yard performance.

Still, it's difficult to shake the feeling of the middle two quarters, which were indisputably ugly. The offense has some issues to work out, especially in the red zone, where they haven't scored a touchdown since the wrongfully negated Crawford catch to open the Florida game. Next week, Air Force presents another overmatched opponent, but one that's tricky to prepare for because of their unusual schemes on both sides of the ball. If Michigan doesn't bounce back with a more authoratative win, the good feeling from the Florida game won't carry over to Big Ten play.

Comments

DonAZ

September 9th, 2017 at 7:53 PM ^

I don't think Drevno is the sole play-caller.  I've seen it written about, and Harbaugh mentioned it as well -- it's an odd consensus thing between Drevno, Harbaugh, and Hamilton.  Last year it was Drevno, Harbaugh and Fisch.  Drevno is the OC, true ... but the in-game play calling is a committee thing.  Maybe that's the problem.

PurpleBeaverEater

September 9th, 2017 at 8:56 PM ^

This is true and I fully remember the write up regarding this. I also remember thinking that maybe it was a JF issue. Then he moved on to UCLA and problems persisted. However, you are right in that even if Drev is the OC and calls the plays, Harbaugh has the final say and is fully able to veto whatever he wants based on what he sees. He trusts them enough to let the plays come in the way they do. I trust Harbaugh. I'm done whining about Drev now

M-jed

September 9th, 2017 at 6:17 PM ^

This game was definitely a letdown game but Speight played poorly.

"Speight, for all the complaining, completed 17-of-29 passes for 221 yards, two touchdowns, and no picks."

Not sure what it'll take to be critcal but he did not play a good game today. 

el Tigres

September 9th, 2017 at 6:23 PM ^

PREFACE- I am a huge Harbaugh fan.  I have every hope that he is our coach for the next forever, however:

The last 6 games or so have been poorly coached (horrific play calling at critical times), poorly executed (quite often),  and sloppy (Stupid Penalties/Turnovers)!

I do not know why this is. I do not like it.  Some good play at times, but not the kind of play that you would expect from a Harbaugh coached team.  Too many stupid mistakes.  Lot's of the stupidity starts with the QB, sad to say, and this is supposed to be Harbaugh's strength, the QB Whisperer.

I do expect us to turn it around, but when we do, it will be a return to disciplined, smart football. 

Steve333

September 9th, 2017 at 6:32 PM ^

If it was Wisconsin, PSU or Ohio, we are in trouble. Their receivers dropped passes, which was lucky for us- especially the deep ball along the sideline- anyone else that's 6 points and they are back in the game. Things need to improve. O-line is letting too much into our backfield. Much to clean up. I'm glad it's a win, but what I saw made me nervous.

Wolvie3758

September 9th, 2017 at 6:35 PM ^

thinking about all the things I was dissapointed in after the game..and there were many BUT then it came to me...Post Florida letdown..Beating UF was Crucial to possibly having a 10 win or more season and Michigan played like it..Today was the letdown....wash hands move forward and forget this game....Also how can u be dissapointed in a 22 pt win ? warts and all

His Dudeness

September 9th, 2017 at 6:48 PM ^

Well we put the double slant that went to Crawford on film to get a first down on a third and long late in the 3rd quarter. Pretty sure they didn't want to put that on film, but we had to put them away.

PurpleBeaverEater

September 9th, 2017 at 6:41 PM ^

Today was definitely rough on the offensive side. Defense looked pretty solid with some small exceptions. Couple bad calls by the refs went cincy's way (PI on Hill prior to the first Cindy TD was bad, Perry definitely caught that pass on 3rd down), but we also had like 8 penalties for almost 100 yards. Plenty of material for them to practice over the course of the next week. I recall a handful of people wanting to see some mistakes this week to give us some direction for progress and fixing issues prior to seeing the B1G schedule, and I think that's what we got. Speight's mechanics looked weird for most of the game, and any time I found myself paying attention to that, I noticed the ball coming out high, behind the receiver, lacking a tight spin, etc. Hopefully he finds a groove here fast. My biggest complaint is mentioned above; I thought the play calling was very basic most of the game and even predictable. I mentioned that to a friend who was at the game about the middle of the third quarter. Just didn't seem to be any attempt at challenging the defense, even when they were stuffing play calls left and right. A lot of designed routes out to the flat or check downs on 3rd and medium or 3rd and long. Maybe it's and RPS thing and I simply have no idea about the intricacies, but frustrating nonetheless. Happy to escape with the W, happy to have things to improve on. Time to work and dig in for AF.

J.

September 9th, 2017 at 7:03 PM ^

That was PI on Hill.  It was borderline, but it wasn't definitively wrong.  I was more irritated by the refusal to call offensive pass interference or holding against Cincinnati.  I don't buy "rubbin's racin'"  If eligible receivers are supposed to be able to block DBs, then put that into the rulebook.  If not, call it.  Brock Huard sure seemed to enjoy his victim-blaming though: "Well, Michigan's really aggressive; they initiate the contact here."  (Cut to the Cincinnati receiver throwing a block)  ... crickets.

The roughing the passer / targeting call was almost disatrous.  Happily, the review official realized it was a terrible call; sadly, UC still got an undeserved first down out of it.

In reply to by J.

PurpleBeaverEater

September 9th, 2017 at 9:01 PM ^

Yeah, slight grab at the collar, I recall the replay now and him having a handful of jersey. Right in front of the ref, it'll get called. Poor example, but the point still stands. And yeah, that "targeting" thing on Gary...do they have ANY guidelines for that rule at all? Or is it just making sure you attempt to call it a few times a game? He came in face mask up and in the upper chest on the QB. Pretty textbook tackling

His Dudeness

September 9th, 2017 at 6:46 PM ^

We won the game. No need to shit on any of the guys. Did they play their best game? No. Kind of hard to get up to play the Bearcats after a huge win in Dallas. You people shitting on this team are going look stupid later in the season.

Stringer Bell

September 9th, 2017 at 6:51 PM ^

A lot of hand wringing over a very young team's 2nd game.  Remember when OSU got shit on at home in their 2nd game the year they won the natty?  We have a boatload of talent and a great coach.  As Aaron Rodgers would say: R-E-L-A-X

Hotel Putingrad

September 9th, 2017 at 6:58 PM ^

there was obviously a let down from last week, and we already knew Speight's limitations. But a win is a win, and I expect them to play much better next week (although likely ending up with a smaller margin of victory).

Lawyer12

September 9th, 2017 at 7:09 PM ^

Ohio State loses and nobody talks about us much this week. We rank 7-8 until we beat PSU. Of that happens we can still lose one along the way (not OSU) and still play OSU for a chance to go to the champ game and a shot at the playoff. Assuming OSU beats PSU.

turtleboy

September 9th, 2017 at 7:18 PM ^

Surprised that this game felt closer than the last one, surprised that the same issues occurred against our meager homecoming opponent, really surprised that, after two games of these issues, they go into the locker room, get yelled at and fired up, adjustments are made, and the offense plays even worse in the second half. It did get fixed, hopefully for more than once quarter. It, also, wouldn't surprise me to see players on the team go through the Rudockening, where they change from an early season liability, to the strength of the team by seasons end.

G. Gulo of the Dale

September 9th, 2017 at 10:35 PM ^

Claiming that Speight deserves criticism and claiming that Hayden Moore was "legions better than Speight" are two completely different matters.  The OP originally claimed the latter, which is pretty baffling given that Moore completed 37.5% of his passes, threw two completely horrible pick-sixes, and missed multiple open receivers, including missing one badly on an overthrow that would have likely been a touchdown.  Moore played with poise through much of the game, but did not by any measure have a good game, and this board would be in DEFCON mode right now if Speight had played like Moore.  

(And, yes, Moore played againtst a much better defense, but unfortunately I don't know how well he would have played against his own defense today because he played against us.)

Fezzik

September 9th, 2017 at 7:35 PM ^

Not calling O'Korn to start but curious why I read so much about Speight will improve stuff while O'Korn has been completely written off. Our sample size of O'Korn is garbage time snaps, a game in terrible weather conditions, and 2 drives last week. He appeared to still have happy feet but also through a perfect pass on his lone throw. Am I missing something?

Amaznbluedoc

September 9th, 2017 at 7:36 PM ^

Was in the stands today after making the long cross country trip. Incredibly beautiful fall day and the stands were filled with maize and blue faithful. If there was a game to have the yips, this was it and considering the inevitable post Florida let down, the performance was not all that unexpected. Still apart from Gary, Bush! Issac, and Perry, the rest of the team looked lackluster. Sp8 was just pitiful and he's playing at the top of his game. I swear the guy has some serious concentration problems and he singlehandedly disrupted drive after drive. Right now, it's looking like an 8-4 but could be as bad as 6-6 season if they play the rest of the games like today. I hope I'm wrong but I don't see a way past ohio, wisky, psu, and sparty. Quite frankly Purdue, iu, MD, and nearly every other team on the schedule will be challenging. I'm just praying this was the yips in a very young team and not a harbinger of things to come.

BornInA2

September 9th, 2017 at 7:50 PM ^

Eight hours ago you would have scoffed at Cinci being challenging. Despite losing to EMU today, Rutgers hung with Washington last week, and they are solid and coming off a playoff year.

We aren't going to level the field against OSU and other top-tier teams until the best we can expect from our QB is "Wasn't a liability".

Amaznbluedoc

September 9th, 2017 at 8:02 PM ^

What is the character of this team? Young guys like Gary and Bush playing lights out being crippled by a lack of high quality seniors? Isaac is a stud 5th Year who is delivers but I don't sense the leadership and have a firm impression of the team. Again it comes down to performance. The team who showed up against FL could go 10-2 hampered by a lack of QB. The team who played today could go 6-6.

Drbogue

September 9th, 2017 at 8:07 PM ^

Or they remember escaping Akron, losing to Appalachian State, and nearly losing to Air Force. Oh wait, maybe struggling against Cincinnati should be a cause for concern?
Insufferable is watching your "experienced" QB to throw the ball 3 feet over the heads of his receivers time and time again.